Search Results

Powderfree Vinyl Examination Gloves are worn on the hands of health care and similar personnel to prevent contamination between health care personnel and the patient.

Not Found

I'm sorry, but the provided text does not contain the information needed to answer your request. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Top Glove Powder-Free Vinyl Examination Gloves." It confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.

The document discusses:

• The device name and regulation number.
• The FDA's determination of substantial equivalence.
• The general controls provisions of the Act that apply to the device.
• Contact information for FDA offices.
• An "Indications for Use" statement for the gloves.

However, there is no mention of acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, or ground truth establishment for a device. These concepts are typically associated with the evaluation of more complex medical devices, particularly those involving algorithms, imaging, or specific diagnostic/therapeutic claims, not with a basic product like examination gloves.

Ask a specific question about this device

Powdered Vinyl Examination Gloves are worn on the hands of health care and similar personnel to prevent contamination between health care personnel and the patient.

Powdered Vinyl Examination Gloves

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for "Powdered Vinyl Examination Gloves." This document is a regulatory approval letter from the FDA. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, as typically understood for AI/software devices.

The FDA 510(k) clearance process demonstrates "substantial equivalence" to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than proving performance against specific acceptance criteria through a clinical or algorithmic study in the way AI devices are evaluated.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information (acceptance criteria, reported device performance, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC study details, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details) from this document. This document pertains to a medical device (examination gloves), not an AI or software device that would typically undergo the types of studies inquiring about.

Ask a specific question about this device