Search Results

The Ovulation Tester is an over-the-counter device intended to detect the most fertile days of a woman's menstrual cycle by the direct visualization of the characteristic peri-ovulatory ferning pattern seen in dried saliva. This ferning occurs due to increased levels of estrogen.

The Ovulation Tester is a complete system for identifying the most fertile day(s) of a woman's menstrual cycle using a direct saliva sample. These fertile days are detected through the observation of distinctive crystallization or ferning patterns seen on a glass slide. The test is selfadministered and is completely portable. The system requires no reagents nor specific storage conditions, can be performed with relative ease, and results may be interpreted within approximately 10 minutes of saliva application. The test is intended for over-the-counter (OTC) use.

The Ovulation Tester Kit consists of:

1. the Ovulation Tester device (see below for further details) with tracking disk
2. an extra tracking disk
3. the saliva brush applicator
4. the Instruction Booklet
5. a marking pencil
6. the storage bag

The Ovulation Tester device consists of

1. the black microscope eyepiece
2. the rubber eve cup (shown installed over the black eyepiece)
3. the tracking disk (stored in the unit)
4. the battery (already in place)
5. the light source (already in place)

The Ovulation Tester is a hand-held, circular shaped "minimicroscope" containing four sets of five miniaturized microscope slides in a plastic case. The slides are made from optical glass, and are placed on a round tracking disk; the disk serves as the platform for viewing the dried saliva patterns. One tracking disk may be used for several months. The device also includes a small built-in light (light emitting diode [LED]) as its light source for viewing the slides, a replaceable battery (1.5 volt) and electronic circuitry.

The system is designed to perform sequential testing over five consecutive days; the testing days are based on the woman's expected cycle length. To perform the test, a woman places a thin coat of saliva on a slide by means of the saliva brush applicator. After the saliva has been allowed to air-dry, the tracking disk is rotated so that the day-specific slide lines up at the proper opening. The device is brought in close proximity to the viewing eye, and a black button on the back of the device is pushed: this activates the green light to allow viewing of the dried saliva patterns. The preovulatory days are characterized by ferning patterns, while, on other days, the slides will appear with "debris-like" substances such as dots, circles, or cells.

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for TCI Ovulation Tester™

The provided document describes the TCI Ovulation Tester™, an over-the-counter device intended to detect the most fertile days of a woman's menstrual cycle by visualizing ferning patterns in dried saliva. The summary presents clinical and consumer study data to demonstrate its performance.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly state pre-defined acceptance criteria with specific numerical thresholds for accuracy or readability. Instead, it presents performance metrics from studies as evidence of the device's capability. Based on the provided text, the implied acceptance is based on demonstrating equivalence to an existing urinary LH kit and acceptable readability by untrained users.

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance

• Test Set Sample Sizes:
  • Clinical Studies (Accuracy): 166 premenopausal women
  • Consumer Studies (Readability): 163 untrained women
  • Consumer Studies (Identification): The text mentions "another evaluation" with consumers, but the specific sample size for this 92% identification rate is not explicitly stated as distinct from the 163 for readability, though it implies a separate assessment.
• Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin for the study data. It also does not explicitly state whether the studies were retrospective or prospective, but clinical and consumer studies for device validation are typically prospective.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

• Clinical Studies (Accuracy): The ground truth for identifying impending ovulation was established by comparison to a "urinary LH kit." While the LH kit itself serves as a reference, the document does not specify the number of experts or their qualifications involved in interpreting the LH kit results or confirming the LH surge for the 166 premenopausal women.
• Consumer Studies (Readability/Identification): For the readability study, the performance of the untrained consumers was compared against a "trained reader." The number of trained readers is not specified, nor are their specific qualifications (e.g., years of experience, medical background).

4. Adjudication Method

The document does not describe any specific adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) used for establishing the ground truth or resolving discrepancies in either the clinical or consumer studies. The comparison for accuracy was against an LH kit, and for readability, it was against a "trained reader," implying a single point of reference without a multi-reader adjudication process mentioned.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No MRMC comparative effectiveness study is explicitly mentioned. The studies described focus on the standalone performance of the device and its readability by individual consumers compared to a reference (LH kit or trained reader), rather than comparing human readers with and without AI assistance to quantify an effect size.

6. Standalone Performance Study

Yes, a standalone performance study was done.

• Accuracy Study: The "clinical studies with 166 premenopausal women" assessed the device's ability to identify impending ovulation (93% accuracy) compared to a urinary LH kit. This is a measure of the algorithm/device's performance in detecting the intended biological event.
• Readability Study: The "consumer studies with 163 untrained women" assessed how well untrained users could interpret the device's results (93% readability). This also represents a form of standalone performance, albeit from the user's perspective.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

• Clinical Studies (Accuracy): The ground truth for "impending ovulation" was established by comparison to a urinary LH kit, which detects the midcycle LH surge. This is a biochemical marker/reference standard.
• Consumer Studies (Readability/Identification): The ground truth for "ferning" was established by a trained reader (expert interpretation) or by inference from the LH kit results for the timing of ovulation.

8. Sample Size for Training Set

The document does not provide any information about the sample size used for a training set. This suggests that the device's core mechanism for detecting ferning patterns likely relies on optical observation and user interpretation based on instructions, rather than a machine learning model that would require a distinct training set for algorithm development.

9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established

Since no training set is mentioned for an algorithm, there is no information on how ground truth for a training set was established. The device operates on the principle of direct visualization of ferning patterns by the user, guided by the instruction booklet.

Ask a specific question about this device