Search Results

The Disposable Surgical Gowns are intended to be worn by operating room personnel during surgical procedures to protect the surgical patient and operating room personnel from the transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and particulate matter. In addition, this surgical gown meets the requirements of AAMI Level 3 barrier protection for a surgical gown per ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance and classification of protective apparel and drapes intended for use in health care facilities (AAMI PB70). This is a single use, disposable device, provided sterile.

The proposed device is a poly-reinforced surgical gown, the critical zone is front chest and sleeves. The critical zone is reinforced with PP/PE composite breathable film. The proposed device is available in four different sizes, include M, L, XL,TL. The proposed devices can meet the requirements for Level 3 per ANSVAAMI PB70:2012. The proposed devices are disposable medical devices and provided sterile.

The document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA regarding a Disposable Surgical Gown. It outlines the device's technical specifications and compares it to a predicate device. The "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in this context refer to non-clinical performance and safety testing required for regulatory clearance, not studies involving AI or human reader performance as one might expect for a diagnostic AI device.

Here's an analysis based on the provided document:

This document describes the testing for a Disposable Surgical Gown, which is a physical medical device, not a diagnostic AI/algorithm. Therefore, concepts like "MRMC comparative effectiveness study," "standalone algorithm performance," "human readers improve with AI," "number of experts for ground truth," "adjudication method," and "training set size/ground truth establishment" are not applicable to this type of medical device submission. The "acceptance criteria" relate to physical and biological performance characteristics of the gown.

Non-Clinical Performance and Safety Testing for Disposable Surgical Gown

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

Ask a specific question about this device

The Disposable Medical Surgical Masks are intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and particulate material. They are in infection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This is a single use, disposable device(s), provided non-sterile.

The Disposable Medical Surgical Masks are green color, three-layer, flat-folded masks with nose piece and ear loops. The green colorant is polypropylene (PP) master batch.

The inner and outer layers are made of spun-bond polypropylene, and the middle layer is made of melt blown polypropylene filter.

The ear loops are held in place over the users' mouth and nose by two ear loops welded to the face mask. The ear loops are not made with natural rubber latex or fiberglass, but nylon and spandex.

The nose piece in the layers of face mask is to allow the user to fit the mask around their nose, which is made of Iron core coated with Polyethylene.

The Disposable Medical Surgical Masks are sold non-sterile and are intended to be single use, disposable devices.

The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA for a Disposable Medical Surgical Mask. It details the device's technical specifications, intended use, and comparison to a predicate device, as well as the results of non-clinical performance and biological safety tests.

However, the request asks for specific information related to acceptance criteria and a study proving a medical device meets these criteria, particularly focusing on aspects like AI assistance, human reader performance improvement, ground truth establishment, sample sizes for training and test sets, and expert involvement. The document describes a surgical mask, which is a physical product, not a medical device that would involve AI, image analysis, or human reader performance in the context of the questions asked.

Therefore, many of the questions asked (e.g., about AI, human readers, ground truth for training/test sets, MRMC studies) are not applicable to the information provided in this document, which pertains to the physical and biological performance of a surgical mask.

I will interpret the request as asking about the acceptance criteria and proof of performance as presented in this document for a surgical mask, acknowledging that many of the AI/image analysis specific questions are not relevant here.

Here's an analysis based on the provided document:

Acceptance Criteria and Study Proving Device Meets Criteria (for a Disposable Medical Surgical Mask)

The study described in this document is a non-clinical performance and biological safety evaluation conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the Disposable Medical Surgical Mask to a legally marketed predicate device.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Ask a specific question about this device