Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(57 days)
Sonoma Orthopedics Products, Inc
The Sonoma Fibula Repair System is intended for use in the fixation of fibula fractures and osteotomies.
The Sonoma Fibula Repair System includes all implants and instruments required for the fixation of fibula fractures and osteotomies. The Sonoma Fibula Repair System includes the Sonoma Fibula Rod, Sonoma Bone Screws, End Cap and related instruments. Sonoma's Fibula Rod differs from traditional nails or rods as it utilizes Sonoma's ActivLoc® fixation gripper system at the proximal end of the rod to allow for proximal fixation without the use of screws. The implants are composed of 316 stainless steel per ASTM F138.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the Sonoma Fibula Repair System, outlining the acceptance criteria and study information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The provided text does not explicitly state specific quantitative acceptance criteria or provide detailed performance data from a study. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on intended use, indications for use, and material composition.
However, based on the context of a 510(k) submission, the implicit "acceptance criteria" revolve around demonstrating comparable safety and effectiveness to legally marketed predicate devices. The "reported device performance" in this context refers to the similarities identified.
| Acceptance Criterion (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Intended Use Equivalence: The new device's intended use is substantially the same as predicate devices. | The intended use of the subject device (Sonoma Fibula Repair System) is stated to be the same as the Acumed predicate devices (Acumed Small Bone Locking Rod System II). Both are for the fixation of fibula fractures and osteotomies. |
| Indications for Use Equivalence: The new device's indications for use are substantially similar, or a subset of, predicate devices. | The indications for use for the subject device are "the fixation of fibula fractures and osteotomies." This is described as limited to the fibula compared to additional anatomical locations for the Acumed predicate devices, indicating it is a subset. There were "no changes to the subject components or accessories compared to the predicate Sonoma Fibula Repair System (K142945)." This implies that the previous K142945 submission already established equivalence for the fibula. |
| Technological Characteristics Equivalence: The new device's technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. | The implants are composed of "316 stainless steel per ASTM F138," a common and well-understood material in medical devices. The system utilizes "Sonoma's ActivLoc® fixation gripper system at the proximal end of the rod to allow for proximal fixation without the use of screws," which is a design feature of the device. The assertion of "no changes to the subject components or accessories compared to the predicate Sonoma Fibula Repair System (K142945)" further supports technological equivalence for this specific system. |
| Performance Testing (if required): Device meets relevant performance standards or demonstrates comparable performance to predicate(s). | The document explicitly states: "No performance testing was performed associated with the additional indication of osteotomies for the Sonoma Fibular Rod System." This suggests that previous performance testing (for K142945) was deemed sufficient for "fractures," and the "osteotomies" indication was considered equivalent without new testing based on design similarity. |
| Material Equivalence: The materials used are equivalent to predicate devices or well-established for medical use. | Implants are made of "316 stainless steel per ASTM F138." This is a standard medical grade material for orthopedic implants. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not describe an independent test set with efficacy data. The submission is a 510(k) for "substantial equivalence" to existing predicate devices, rather than a de novo submission requiring extensive clinical trial data.
The "data provenance" primarily consists of referencing existing FDA clearances (K142945, K071944, K031438) for the predicate devices. This indicates a reliance on the previously established safety and effectiveness of those devices, rather than new, primary data from a study for this submission.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable. As no independent test set with efficacy data is described, there's no mention of experts establishing ground truth for such a set.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. No independent test set is described.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI-based device. It is a physical orthopedic implant system.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Not applicable. This is not an AI-based device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
Not applicable. For a substantial equivalence claim for a physical implant, "ground truth" in the clinical efficacy sense (e.g., pathology, outcomes data) is typically established through a combination of:
- Engineering and Biomechanical Testing: (Though not explicitly detailed in this summary, would have been part of previous submissions for K142945).
- Clinical Experience with Predicate Devices: The long history of successful use of the predicate devices.
- Material Standards Compliance: Adherence to established ASTM standards for medical-grade materials.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This is not an AI-based device that would require a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable. This is not an AI-based device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(119 days)
Sonoma Orthopedics Products, Inc
The Sonoma Cancellous Screws are intended for use in the fixation of bone fractures appropriate for the size of the screw. The washer is used to increase bone contact area and prevent the screw head from subsiding into the bone. These screws are not intended for attachment or fixation to the posterior elements (pedicles) of cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine.
Sonoma Cancellous Bone Screws and Washers are a family of stainless steel screws and washers used for various skeletal repairs where cancellous screw thread profiles are clinically desired. The screws are offered in range of diameters from 4mm to 7.3mm, in both cannulated and solid configurations. The screw dimensions including thread profile, thread length, core diameter, cannulation diameter (where applicable), head diameter, overall length, and driving socket size are equivalent to the predicate device. Where applicable, these features are dimensioned as described by ASTM F543-13 (i.e. 4.0mm and 6.5mm solid screws). The washers are sized according to screw diameter and can be used to prevent head subsidence in soft bone. The screws and washers are manufactured from 316 stainless steel per ASTM F138.
The provided text describes the Sonoma Cancellous Bone Screw and Washer and its regulatory submission. It does not present a study or acceptance criteria related to a medical device's performance in diagnosing or treating a condition, nor does it involve any form of AI or algorithm.
The information provided pertains to the substantial equivalence of a bone screw and washer to a predicate device, focusing on material, dimensions, and mechanical properties. The FDA 510(k) summary explains how the device meets regulatory requirements, not how it meets clinical performance acceptance criteria in a study involving human or image data.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information (table of acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC study results, standalone performance, ground truth details, or training set information) because this document does not contain an AI/algorithm-related study or performance data for such criteria.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1