Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K992760
    Date Cleared
    1999-10-25

    (69 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4400
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Select-Sutter Micro-Bipolar Forceps are intended for use by a physician familiar with electrosurgery in bipolar coagulation for general surgery where coagulation of soft tissue is needed. This product is used with bipolar output of standard electrosurgical generators. The types of surgery intended are:

    General sugery
    Laparoscopic procedures
    Endoscopic procedures
    Laryngeal coagulation
    Orthopedic coagulation
    Thorascopic coagulation
    Neurosurgical coagulation
    Gynecological coagulation, (except for use in female sterilization)
    Ear, Nose and Throat coagulation

    Device Description

    The Micro-Bipolar Forceps Device is a laparoscopic and endoscopic device used for the grasping and general coagulation/cutting and pinpoint coagulation of tissue using electrosurgical energy under visualization. The device is used with bipolar outputs of electrosurgical generators and has reusuable probes for grasping/coagulation and pinpoint coagulation.

    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) summary (K992760) describes the Select-Sutter Micro-Bipolar Forceps. However, it does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.

    The document provided is a 510(k) summary for a medical device cleared by the FDA. Such summaries primarily focus on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than detailing specific performance studies with acceptance criteria in the manner you've requested for AI/software devices. For hardware devices like these electrosurgical forceps, the "proof" of meeting acceptance criteria typically comes from a series of engineering tests (e.g., electrical safety, mechanical strength, biocompatibility), which are usually referenced in the full 510(k) submission but not elaborated in the publicly available summary.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the subsequent questions based on the provided text. The document describes the device, its intended use, and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device, but it does not include performance data, study designs, or ground truth establishment relevant to an AI/software device evaluation.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1