Search Results

The Seiko ColorPoint™ model 1700 medical imager & Video Capture Box systems are indicated for converting the electronic signals from medical imaging modalities into hard copy suitable for diagnosis and record keeping.

The Seiko ColorPoint™ Medical Imager and Video Capture systems are designed for medical imaging applications printing color or monochrome images on paper and or film media.

Please note: The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical imager and video capture box. It describes the device, its intended use, and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It does NOT contain information about acceptance criteria, a specific study designed to prove device performance against those criteria, or details regarding ground truth, expert adjudication, or sample sizes related to performance evaluation.

Therefore, I cannot populate most of the requested fields as the information is not present in the provided document.

Here's what can be extracted and what cannot:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Study Details

1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. This document does not describe a performance study with a test set. It's a regulatory submission for substantial equivalence.
2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. (See above)
3. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. (See above)
4. If a multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This device is a medical imager and video capture system, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool.
5. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This device is hardware for producing hard copies of images; it's not an algorithm with standalone performance.
6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable.
7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. (See above – not an AI/algorithm-based device)
8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable. (See above)

Summary of available information from the document:

• Device Name: Seiko Instruments, ColorPoint™ 1700 Medical Imagers and Video Capture Box (VCX) systems (specifically ColorPoint™ 1720 Medical Imagers and Video Capture Box CX-1000 series).
• Intended Use: Converting electronic signals from medical imaging modalities into hard copy suitable for diagnosis and record keeping.
• Predicate Device: Seiko Instruments Inc. ColorPoint™ Model 820 Medical Imager (K971760).
• Regulatory Decision: Substantially Equivalent.
• Key Argument for Equivalence: The new device's technological characteristics are similar to the predicate, and it does not contact the patient or control life-sustaining devices. Images are interpreted by a physician, allowing for human intervention. The device complies with voluntary standards and has undergone a hazard analysis classifying potential hazards as MINOR.

Ask a specific question about this device

The device is indicated for producing full-bleed thermal wax prints in various sizes from medical image signal inputs.

Color point 820 PS, 830 Ps and Professional Colorpoint 2 Model 04.

The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the Seiko Instruments, Inc. ColorPoint 820PS and 830PS Color Printer. This document specifically states the device is an "Unclassified Procode: 90 LMC" and is intended for "producing full-bleed thermal wax medical image signal inputs."

Based on the content of these documents, it is not possible to provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria. This type of FDA clearance letter does not typically contain detailed performance specifications, clinical study results, or information regarding ground truth and expert reviews for medical devices.

The FDA 510(k) clearance process for unclassified devices like this color printer often relies on substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than extensive clinical efficacy studies with predefined acceptance criteria for performance metrics.

Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions about the study from the given text.

Ask a specific question about this device