Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(79 days)
SCANDIMED INTERNATIONAL
The Auto Band Ligator is used to band esophageal varices or hemorrhoids in the colon. For single use only.
The Scandimed Auto-Band Ligator consists of a ligator wheel head mounted on a scope fixation arm and connected by a stainless steel thread to the band barrel.
The only modifications being proposed in this current Special 510(k) Premarket Notification are to change the latex formulation of the rubber ligating bands and to expand the product line to include 6 and 8 band variations.
The Auto-Band Ligator incorporates the following product features:
- Automatic Reverse Movement to START position after each release
- Snap Fixation system ensures stable fixation on the scope
- Adjustable Snap Fixation System facilitates fixation on all brands of scopes
- Precision One-Step Release Mechanism of bands
- Only a single band can be released at a time
- Latex or Latex Free Rubber Bands
- Available in 5, 6, 7, 8 or 10 band configurations
The provided 510(k) summary for the Scandimed International Auto-Band Ligator (K083556) is for a Special 510(k) Premarket Notification to address a material formulation change to the ligation bands and to expand the product line to include 6 and 8 band variations. This type of submission typically focuses on demonstrating that the modifications do not negatively impact the safety and effectiveness established for the predicate device.
Therefore, the study described is primarily performance testing to confirm the continued safety and effectiveness of the modified device.
Here's an analysis of the available information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and the Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria (Inferred) | Reported Device Performance | Comments |
---|---|---|
Safety and Effectiveness of the device (general regulatory standard) | "The results of the performance testing demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the device." | This is a high-level statement. Specific quantitative criteria and results are not detailed in this summary. For a Special 510(k), the criteria would likely relate to maintaining the performance characteristics of the predicate device. |
Performance characteristics (e.g., band release mechanism, fixation system, material integrity) | Stated that "technological characteristics such as materials, performance characteristics and packaging are identical or substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate devices." | Implies that the modified device met the established performance standards of the predicate, but specific tests or numerical results are not provided. |
Material compatibility/formulation change | Implied through "performance testing" that the new latex formulation met safety and performance standards. | No specific tests for material properties or biocompatibility are listed, though these would have been part of the underlying testing. |
Functionality of new 6 and 8 band configurations | Implicitly confirmed through "performance testing" and comparison to predicate. | No specific tests for these new configurations are explicitly detailed. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance
- Sample Size: Not specified.
- Data Provenance: Not specified (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts
- This type of information is not applicable to the performance testing described. The summary indicates physical performance tests of the device itself, not clinical studies requiring expert interpretation of data.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not applicable. The summary refers to performance testing of the device, not a clinical study involving human assessment and adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
- No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This 510(k) is for a physical device (ligator), not a diagnostic AI algorithm.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
- No, a standalone (algorithm only) performance study was not done. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- For the described performance testing, the "ground truth" would be the engineering specifications and established performance characteristics of the predicate device. The tests would confirm that the modified device's performance aligns with these objective standards.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set. The performance testing involves physical samples of the device.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not applicable. As above, there is no "training set" for this type of device.
Summary of Device Performance and Study:
The 510(k) summary states that "The Auto-Band Ligator was subjected to relevant performance testing. The results of the performance testing demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the device." For a Special 510(k) for a material change and product line expansion, "performance testing" would typically involve:
- Functional testing: To ensure the band release mechanism, snap fixation system, and other features work correctly with the new band material and in the new 6/8 band configurations.
- Material properties testing: To ensure the new latex formulation meets required physical properties (e.g., elasticity, strength, durability) and biocompatibility standards.
- Dimensional verification: To confirm the new 6 and 8 band configurations fit and function as intended within the existing device design.
The claim of substantial equivalence relies on demonstrating that these modifications do not alter the fundamental technological characteristics, safety, or effectiveness established by the predicate device (Scandimed International Auto-Band Ligator #K031236 and #K081142). The details of these tests, including sample sizes and specific criteria, are not provided in this public summary.
Ask a specific question about this device
(24 days)
SCANDIMED INTERNATIONAL
The Auto Band Ligator is used to band esophageal varices or hemorrhoids in the colon. For single use only.
The Scandimed Auto-Band Ligator consists of a ligator wheel head mounted on a scope fixation arm and connected by a stainless steel thread to the band barrel. The only change being proposed in this current Special 510(k) Premarket Notification is to convert the original latex rubber ligating bands to latex free rubber ligating bands. The Auto-Band Ligator incorporates the following product features: Automatic Reverse Movement to START position after each release. Snap Fixation system ensures stable fixation on the scope. Adjustable Snap Fixation System facilitates fixation on all brands of scopes. Precision One-Step Release Mechanism of bands. Only a single band can be released at a time. Latex Free Rubber Bands. Available in 5, 7 or 10 band configurations.
This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for the Scandimed International Auto-Band Ligator. The purpose of this notification is to introduce a material change from latex ligation bands to latex-free ligation bands.
As such, this document does not contain information related to acceptance criteria, specific device performance data in a quantifiable manner, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or multi-reader multi-case studies typically associated with AI/ML device evaluations. This submission is for a medical device that has undergone a material change (latex to latex-free bands) and is not an AI/ML powered device.
Therefore, the requested information cannot be extracted from the provided text.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1