Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K232468
    Device Name
    SC Medica FFX
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2024-05-09

    (268 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    N/A
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    SC Medica

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    SC Medica FFX is a lumbar facet device that is placed bilaterally through a posterior surgical approach and spans the facet interspace. SC Medica FFX must be used with an FDA-cleared transfacet screw cleared for use in the lumbar spine. SC Medica FFX is intended to provide temporary fixation to the spine as an aid to lumbar fusion through bilateral immobilization of the facet joints at one or two levels with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft. SC Medica FFX must be accompanied with an FDA-cleared intervertebral body fusion device and/or with an FDA-cleared posterior lumbar pedicle screw and rod system implanted at the same spinal level(s) as an adjunct to a single or two-level intervertebral body or posterolateral fusion, respectively. SC Medica FFX is indicated for the treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) from L3 to S1 in skeletally mature patients who have failed conservative care.

    Device Description

    FFX implants are intended to provide temporary fixation and stabilization to the spine as an aid to lumbar fusion through bilateral immobilization of the facet joints. The FFX implant is a sterile, single patient use, long-term implantable device made of titanium.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the SC Medica FFX device. It does not contain any information related to acceptance criteria, a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria, or any of the detailed aspects of a clinical or analytical performance study (like sample size, number of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, training set details, etc.).

    The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through non-clinical bench testing (sterilization, biocompatibility, shelf-life, and mechanical testing) and states that "clinical data demonstrated a substantially equivalent safety and effectiveness profile". However, it does not provide any specifics about this "clinical data" (e.g., patient numbers, study design, endpoints, statistical analysis, or any of the ground truth or reader study details requested).

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the specific information regarding acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria based on the provided text. The document primarily confirms the FDA's clearance of the device based on substantial equivalence, rather than detailing a specific performance study against defined acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1