Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K973830
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1998-01-16

    (101 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    According to 21 CFR, a patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner s hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

    Device Description

    POWDER FREE LATEX PATIENT EXAMINATION GLOVES

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain the necessary information to answer your request. The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for "POWDER FREE LATEX PATIENT EXAMINATION GLOVES" and does not detail acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets such criteria. It primarily addresses the regulatory approval of the gloves based on substantial equivalence.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K973831
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1998-01-06

    (91 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    According to 21 CFR, a patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purpose that is worn on the examiner 's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

    Device Description

    PRE POWDERED LATEX PATIENT EXAMINATION GE

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification approval letter for a medical device: "PRE POWDERED LATEX PATIENT EXAMINATION GE" (likely "Glove"). This type of document is a regulatory approval, not a scientific study report. It states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices.

    Therefore, the document does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria. The information requested (such as sample size, ground truth, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, and details of standalone or MRMC studies) is typically found in clinical trial reports or detailed performance studies, which are not part of this 510(k) approval letter.

    The primary "acceptance criterion" for a 510(k) submission is demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which is what this letter confirms. However, specific performance metrics and a study to prove they are met are not detailed here.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1