LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K111103
    Device Name
    DIGITAL X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEM
    Manufacturer
    RF CO., LTD
    Date Cleared
    2012-01-05

    (260 days)

    Product Code
    MUH,EHD,MQB
    Regulation Number
    872.1800
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Radiology
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K062376,K982661,K983283,K012514
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The NAOMI-DPX D100 is indicated for use in acquiring Panoramic radiographic images at the dento-maxillofacial region. The image generated is displayed on a computer monitor. It is intended to replace radiographic film/screen system in dental diagnostic procedures

    Device Description

    The NAOMI-DPX-D100 provided digital image capture for conventional film/screen systems. It is intended to replace the radiographic film/screen systems.

    The x-ray photons incident to the NAOMI-DPX-D100 are detected and converted into the light photons at the scintillator. The light photons are detected and converted into the electrical signal at the CCD. NAOMI-DPX software captures and displays the image.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria. The document is a 510(k) summary for a Digital X-Ray Imaging System (NAOMI-DPX-D100), primarily focusing on its general information, device description, indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence.

    Specifically, the document states:

    • Comparison to predicate: "The performance data demonstrate that NAOMI-DPX-D100 is as safe and effective as the predicate devices (CDR-PAN MODEL4700, Signet DXIS and DIGIPAN DPI)."
    • Conclusion: "It is opinion of RF Co.,Ltd. strongly believe that the NAOMI-DPX-D100 described in this submission is substantially equivalence to predicate device (NAOMI)."

    This indicates that the device's performance was compared to predicate devices for substantial equivalence, but it does not detail specific acceptance criteria, the study design, or the results that would allow for filling out the requested table and answering the subsequent questions. The document mainly highlights that the device is intended to replace conventional film/screen systems and its specifications are "the same or better than NAOMI" (a previous version from the same manufacturer).

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1