Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(266 days)
REMCORE, INC.
The Remcore Remote Control Oxygen Delivery system is an adjunct to the use of supplemental oxygen prescribed by a physician for a patient whose lung disease limits his or her ability to adequately supply the body with oxygen. The amount of supplemental oxygen needed to continuously provide the oxygen saturation prescribed will vary with different degrees of exertion. Current oxygen delivery systems do not allow a patient to alter the flow rate of oxygen when the patient is not next to the oxygen source. The Remore Remote Control Oxygen Delivery System allows a patient to change the flow rate, as prescribed by the physician, in accordance with the activity of the patient. For example, a patient might require 2 liters/minute of supplemental oxygen at rest, but 5 liters/minute to climb the stairs. The Remcore system will allow the patient sitting downstairs to remotely increase the oxygen flow rate to 5 liters/minute, regardless of where in the house the oxygen tank or concentrator is located, and after arriving upstairs to remotely return the oxygen flow rate to 2 liters/minute.
Remcore Remote Control Oxygen Delivery System
This document is a 510(k) clearance letter for the Remcore Remote Control Oxygen Delivery System. As such, it does not contain the detailed study information typically found in clinical trial reports or publications that would describe acceptance criteria, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or multi-reader studies.
Instead, the FDA 510(k) process focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This means the manufacturer provides evidence that their new device is as safe and effective as a device already on the market, rather than conducting new clinical studies to prove absolute safety and effectiveness to predefined acceptance criteria.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided text because it primarily confirms the FDA's decision regarding the device's substantial equivalence and outlines regulatory requirements. The document does not contain information about:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
- Sample sizes or data provenance for a test set.
- Number or qualifications of experts for ground truth.
- Adjudication method for a test set.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness studies or effect sizes.
- Standalone algorithm performance.
- Type of ground truth used.
- Sample size for the training set.
- How ground truth for the training set was established.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1