Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K022407
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2002-08-16

    (23 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    890.3110
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K002580
    Device Name
    PRAIRIE CRUISER
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2001-07-03

    (319 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    890.3860
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K983497
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1999-06-27

    (265 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    890.3860
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The power wheelchair is used as a mobility device for individuals who have limited The power which is assult is assult in the wheelchair is designed especially for larger individuals and can be used for outside mobility or in clinical applications.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a power wheelchair, the Overlander PEV 2000. It does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria related to its performance characteristics.

    The letter focuses on the substantial equivalence determination for regulatory purposes, stating that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. It discusses regulatory classifications, general controls, and good manufacturing practices.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. The document does not describe:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes or data provenance for any test set.
    3. Number or qualifications of experts for ground truth establishment.
    4. Adjudication methods.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness studies or effect sizes.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1