Search Results

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device

The MAGELLAN™ Intramedullary Humeral Nail System is indicated for use in long bone shaft fractures of the humerus which require stabilization of the axis of the bone. These include shaft fractures, segmented fractures, fractures with bone loss, comminuted fractures, proximal and distal fractures, non-unions and malunions.

Not Found

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device called the "Magellan Humeral Intramedullary Nail System." This type of document does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert qualifications for a device's performance evaluation.

510(k) clearances are based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not necessarily on a detailed performance study against specific acceptance criteria like those described in the prompt. While some performance testing might be included in the 510(k) submission, the clearance letter itself doesn't typically detail it in the way requested.

Ask a specific question about this device

The MAGELLAN™ Intramedullary Tibial Nail System is indicated for use in long bone shaft fractures of the tibia which require stabilization of the axis of the bone. These include shaft fractures, segmented fractures, fractures with bone loss, comminuted fractures, proximal and distal fractures, nonunions and malunions.

Magellan Tibial Intramedullary Nail

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the Magellan Tibial Intramedullary Nail. It is not a study report or clinical trial documentation, and therefore, it does not contain the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, nor does it include information about AI/algorithm performance.

The letter states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices. This determination is generally based on demonstrating that the new device has the same intended use and technological characteristics as a predicate device, or if there are differences, that those differences do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.

To fulfill your request, I would need a different type of document, such as a summary of safety and effectiveness data (SSE) or the actual clinical study report submitted with the 510(k). This FDA letter only announces the clearance based on that submission.

Ask a specific question about this device