Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K952790
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1996-10-17

    (486 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.2300
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Not Found.

    Device Description

    Log-a-Rhythm Model 100 is a cardiotachometer and ECG recorder. It is completely non-invasive and is operated with two 9 Volt batteries.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a medical device called "Log-a-Rhythm Model 100", a cardiotachometer and ECG recorder. Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study as described:

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance:

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Accuracy in measuring intervals > 97% concordance with expert-scored values.Concordance of Log-a-Rhythm with the scored values was better than 97 percent.

    Study Information:

    1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

      • Test Set Sample Size: Not explicitly stated, but it utilized the "American Heart Association ECG database".
      • Data Provenance: The "American Heart Association ECG database". No country of origin is specified, but it's an established medical database. The description suggests it's retrospective as the database was "scored by medical experts" presumably prior to the device's testing.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

      • Number of Experts: Not specified ("medical experts" in plural is used, implying more than one).
      • Qualifications of Experts: "Medical experts". No specific qualifications (e.g., cardiologist, years of experience) are provided.
    3. Adjudication method for the test set:

      • Not specified. The description just states the database was "scored by medical experts" without detailing how disagreements among experts (if multiple were involved) were resolved.
    4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done:

      • No. The study described focuses on the device's accuracy against an expert-scored database, not on comparing human readers with and without AI assistance.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

      • Yes. The study assessed the "Concordance of Log-a-Rhythm with the scored values," indicating the device's performance independently in measuring intervals.
    6. The type of ground truth used:

      • Expert consensus (based on the American Heart Association ECG database, which has been "scored by medical experts").
    7. The sample size for the training set:

      • Not applicable/Not provided. The text describes a validation study against an existing database, not the training of an AI algorithm. If this device did use an AI algorithm, the training set size is not mentioned.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

      • Not applicable/Not provided, as the text describes a validation study, not an AI training process.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1