Search Results

The Leisegang Video Colposcope is intended for magnified viewing of the tissues of the vagina, cervix and external genitalia in order to diagnose abnormalities and select areas for biopsy. The image can be viewed only on a color monitor.

The Galileo Leisegang Video Colposcope is intended for magnified viewing of the tissues of the vagina, cervix and external genitalia in order to diagnose abnormalities and select areas for biopsy. The image can be viewed only on a color monitor.

The Leisegang Video Colposcope consists of a CCD camera with a halogen light source, green filter and is mounted on a mobile base.

This 510(k) summary (K981958) is for the Leisegang Video Colposcope. It describes the device's intended use and compares it to predicate devices. However, it does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets such criteria.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. The document focuses on regulatory equivalence rather than performance data. The device is a direct viewing instrument, not an AI/algorithm-driven device, which means the requested parameters (e.g., sample size for training set, MRMC studies, ground truth) are not applicable to the information provided in this 510(k) summary.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes are endoscopes intended for visualization of the cervical canal and uterine cavity for diagnostic and surgical procedures during gynecological procedures. The Hysteroscope diagnostic indications include abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility and pregnancy wastage, evaluation of abnormal hysterosalpingogram, intrauterine foreign body, amenorrhea and pelvic pain. The Hysteroscope is indicated for surgical procedures such as directed biopsy, removal of submucous fibroids and large polyps, submucous myomectomy, transection of intrauterine adhesions and septa and endometrial ablation.

The Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes are a line of disposable endoscopes based on existing endoscope technology. The Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes will be available in several sizes and lengths. The Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes are fiber optic design endoscopes that are offered in disposable configurations only. Fiberoptic design endoscopes function by light being transmitted from a standard external high intensity light source through optical fibers to the distal tip of the endoscope. The image of the target is then transmitted from the distal end via an objective lens and a fiberoptic imaging bundle to a proximal eyepiece. The image can be viewed directly or it may be transmitted through a video camera to a video monitor. The Disposable Hysteroscopes are offered with a coupler that includes a light source which is provided by Galileo Electro-Optics Corporation. The Galileo coupler is compatible only with the Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes and the other cleared commercially available Galileo endoscopes.

Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes (K981828) - Acceptance Criteria and Study Findings

The provided document describes the acceptance criteria and study findings for the Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes, primarily focusing on optical performance and thermal safety.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

• Field of view
• Angle of view
• Resolution on axis
• Uniformity of illumination |
  | Thermal Safety (per IEC 601-2-18) | Passed. "The Disposable Hysteroscopes passed the Thermal Safety Testing." |

Note: Electrical safety testing was planned but not detailed in this submission as being completed prior to commercial distribution.

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance

• Test Set Sample Size: "Samples of each type of hysteroscope containing the lens, image fiber, and illumination fiber were used for this testing." The exact number of samples is not specified beyond "samples of each type."
• Data Provenance: The study was conducted by Galileo Corporation, a U.S. company. The data is based on laboratory testing of their manufactured devices. This is a prospective study in the sense that the testing was performed specifically to evaluate the performance of the new disposable hysteroscopes against their internal acceptance criteria.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

Not applicable. The ground truth for this study was established through objective engineering and optical measurements, not expert human assessment.

4. Adjudication Method

Not applicable. The study involved objective measurements and comparisons against predefined optical and safety standards.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This study focuses on the intrinsic performance of the device's optical and thermal properties, not on human reader performance with or without AI assistance.

6. Standalone Performance Study

Yes, a standalone study was performed. The testing described (optical performance after deflection, thermal safety) evaluated the device itself without human interaction or interpretation as part of the primary outcome. The optical properties (field of view, angle of view, resolution, uniformity of illumination) were objective measurements of the device's capabilities.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used was based on objective engineering measurements and predefined technical standards/specifications. Specifically:

• Optical Performance: Established prior to and after mechanical stress (deflection) by measuring field of view, angle of view, resolution on axis, and uniformity of illumination. The "ground truth" was that these pre- and post-stress measurements should meet the optical acceptance criteria and show no significant change.
• Thermal Safety: Established by compliance with the IEC 601-2-18 standard.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This device is a mechanical/optical medical device, not an AI or algorithm-driven system that requires a "training set."

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Galileo Hysteroscopes are endoscopes intended for direct visualization of the cervical canal and uterine cavity for diagnostic procedures during gynecological procedures. The Hysteroscope diagnostic include abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility and pregnancy wastage, evaluation of abnormal hysterosalpingogram, intrauterine foreign body, amenorrhea and pelvic pain.

The Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes are a line of disposable endoscopes based on existing endoscope technology. The Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes will be available in 2.8 mm OD X 270 mm length size. The Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes are fiber optic design endoscopes that are offered in disposable configurations only. Fiberoptic design endoscopes function by light being transmitted from a standard external high intensity light source through optical fibers to the distal tip of the endoscope. The image of the target is then transmitted from the distal end via an objective lens and a fiberoptic imaging bundle to a proximal eyepiece. The image can be viewed directly or it may be transmitted through a video camera to a video monitor. The Disposable Hysteroscopes are offered with a coupler that includes a light source which is provided by Galileo Electro-Optics Corporation. The Galileo coupler is compatible only with the Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes and the other cleared commercially available Galileo endoscopes.

The provided document, K974297, "Galileo Corporation Galileo Disposable Hysteroscopes," describes the acceptance criteria and the study conducted to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of the device.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: "Samples of each type of hysteroscope containing the lens, image fiber, and illumination fiber were used for this testing." The exact number of samples is not specified, but it implies at least one stainless steel sheathed hysteroscope and at least one polyimide sheathed hysteroscope.
• Data Provenance: The study was conducted by Galileo Corporation, a U.S.-based company, suggesting the data is domestic and likely prospective as it involves new product testing.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

Not applicable. This was a physical performance test for optical and structural integrity, not a study requiring expert clinical or diagnostic ground truth. The "ground truth" was the objective optical measurements before and after stress.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable. This was a physical performance test using objective measurements, not a human reader study requiring adjudication.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. The study focused on the physical and optical performance of the device itself under stress, rather than human readability or diagnostic accuracy with human interpretation.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study

Yes, a standalone study was performed. The study evaluated the intrinsic optical and structural performance of the hysteroscopes in isolation, without human interaction playing a role in the performance metrics. The device's ability to transmit an image and maintain integrity was assessed directly.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used was objective optical performance measurements and structural integrity of the device. This was assessed by measuring properties like field of view, angle of view, resolution on axis, and uniformity of illumination before and after a deflection test. The "truth" was whether these objective physical metrics remained within acceptable standards.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This device is a physical medical instrument, not an AI or algorithm-based device that requires a "training set" in the machine learning sense. The testing performed was validation testing, not model training.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as there was no training set for an AI/algorithm.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Galileo Micro Coupler is indicated for use with endoscopy. It is an interface which allows the transmission of optical image from the endoscope to a video camera for video recording or viewing on a monitor.

The Galileo Micro Couplers are a line of reusable optical couplers used in the transfer of image from an endoscope to a video camera for either image recording or viewing on a monitor. The Galileo Micro Couplers are available in several configurations which will allow coupling to different Endoscopes and camera.

This document is a 510(k) Summary for the Galileo Micro Coupler. It's a premarket notification to the FDA to demonstrate that the device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device. This type of submission focuses on comparing the new device to an existing one, rather than presenting a detailed study proving performance against specific acceptance criteria.

Therefore, the provided text does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria. It focuses on:

• Device Identification: Proprietary and common names, classification.
• Sponsor/Applicant Information.
• Date of Summary Preparation.
• Predicate Device: Identification of a legally marketed device to which the new device claims substantial equivalence (Precision Optics Corp. Coupler K903458).
• Device Description: What the device is (reusable optical couplers for transferring images from endoscopes to video cameras) and its basic function.
• Intended Use: How the device is to be used (interface to transmit optical images from endoscope to camera for viewing/recording).
• Comparison of Technological Characteristics: Stating that the new device and predicate are "identical in intended use" and "identical in various mechanical interfaces" and both use similar optical components (lenses, prisms, windows).
• FDA Response Letter: Confirmation from the FDA that the device is substantially equivalent and can proceed to market.
• Indications for Use Statement.

In summary, there is no clinical study, performance data, or explicit acceptance criteria presented in this 510(k) summary. It is a regulatory submission for substantial equivalence, not a detailed performance study.

Ask a specific question about this device