Search Results

The Mentor Urology Triple Rib Occlusion Wrap for Male Incontinence is indicated for any male, who has urinary incontinence, either on a temporary or long term basis. It is also indicated for those patients who have an adverse reaction to natural latex rubber.

The Mentor Urology Triple Rib Occlusion Wrap for Male Incontinence is a two piece compression device for males with urinary incontinence. The device consists of a silicone gel filled penile compression wrap for occlusion of the urethra and a silicone ring. It is intended for users who would prefer a reusable soft sided device instead of a rigid clamping device. The device is intended for users with moderate to heavy urinary incontinence to provide a temporary means of urinary continence.

This document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the "MENTOR UROLOGY TRIPLE RIB OCCLUSION WRAP FOR MALE INCONTINENCE." It describes the device, its intended use, and some basic safety and testing information.

However, this document does not contain the specific information requested in the prompt regarding acceptance criteria, a study proving the device meets those criteria, or details typically associated with an AI/machine learning device's performance evaluation.

The prompt asks for details like:

• A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
• Sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, and ground truth establishment (including expert details, adjudication, and pathology).
• Information on Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) studies or standalone algorithm performance.
• Training set details.

The provided text only refers to:

• Biological Safety Testing: Stating it meets or exceeds Tripartite and ISO 10993 standards and all tests were satisfactory. This refers to material biocompatibility, not device functional performance with respect to incontinence management.
• Physical Testing, Design Verification: Stating various physical tests were performed to show the device and design are "adequate for the use intended." This is very general and does not provide specific acceptance criteria or performance metrics related to its efficacy in treating incontinence.

Therefore, based solely on the provided text ({0} and {1}), I cannot answer the questions regarding acceptance criteria, specific performance studies, or AI/ML-related evaluation details. The document is for a physical medical device (a urological clamp), not an AI algorithm.

Ask a specific question about this device