Search Results
Found 3 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(322 days)
MAPA GMBH
The NUK Expressive Double Electric Breast Pump is intended to express milk from the breasts. It is intended for use by a single user.
The NUK Expressive Double Electric Breast Pump is intended to express milk from the breasts. It is intended for use by a single user. This is accomplished by an electrical pump system generating a suck and release vacuum pattern. The suction strength is adjustable. The cycles per minute are adjustable. The electrical pumping unit of the device is connected to the breast shields via silicone tubing. The breast shield and screw housing is equipped with a flap valve separating the breast shield from the NUK breast milk container. The system is assembled in an airtight way to ensure that the system can build up vacuum when the breast shield is connected to the breast. The milk will flow through the flap back flow valve into the bottle. A voltage adaptor is provided with the device.
Here's an analysis of the provided text, focusing on the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria:
Device: NUK Expressive Double Electric Breast Pump
Intended Use: To express milk from the breasts, intended for use by a single user.
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The provided document describes a 510(k) submission, which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than setting new, explicit acceptance criteria for performance beyond what is comparable to the predicate. The "acceptance criteria" can be inferred from the comparison points and the tests conducted to show equivalence.
Here's a table based on the comparison and performance sections:
Table: Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from Predicate Equivalence) and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (NUK Expressive Double Electric Breast Pump) |
---|---|
I. Functional Equivalence | |
Intended Use: Express milk from breasts | Intended to express milk from the breasts. Intended for use by a single user. (Substantially equivalent to predicate) |
Intended Users: Lactating women | Lactating women (Substantially equivalent to predicate) |
Portability | Yes (Substantially equivalent to predicate) |
Available over the counter | Yes (Substantially equivalent to predicate) |
Single or double pumping capability | Single or double pumping (Substantially equivalent to predicate) |
Vacuum range: adjustable, |
Ask a specific question about this device
(45 days)
MAPA GMBH
The BillyBoy male latex condom is used for contraceptive and for prophylactic purposes (to help prevent pregnancy and the transmission of sexually transmitted infections). The BillyBoy condoms are Dotted/Beaded and New Condom models.
This condom is made of a natural rubber latex sheath, which completely covers the penis with a closely fitted membrane. The condom is shaped with a reservoir end and is flat with a cylindrical shape. These condoms have a length of ≥175mm, a width of 52mm. The thickness is 0.10 mm. The air burst test pressure is ≥1 k Pa and air burst test volume is ≥18 dm. The primary packaging material is a foil package. The on surface lubricant is silicon oil. The term Dotted refers to the irregular surface of the condom. The irregular surface is not applied externally but is achieved in the molding process. The glass mold has an engraved pattern of semispherical pits replicated as a pattern of small round tips on the surface of the condom. This results in an exterior surface that has a pattern of small raised areas best described as a dotted pattern. The New Condom is defined as a condom of increased thickness relative to some of the other BillyBoy types.
The provided document describes a 510(k) summary for BillyBoy Dotted (Beaded) Condoms and BillyBoy New Condoms. This summary focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to previously marketed predicate devices rather than proving a device meets acceptance criteria through a clinical study with human or image data. Therefore, many of the requested categories regarding clinical studies, expert involvement, and ground truth are not applicable to this type of regulatory submission.
Here's an analysis based on the available information:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document states that the device's performance was evaluated against specific standards. The acceptance criteria are essentially defined by these standards, and the reported performance is "passed all."
Acceptance Criteria (Standard) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
ASTM D3492 (tensile force, elongation, tensile strength (before and after aging), bursting volume, bursting pressure, freedom from holes, microbiological cleanliness, length, wall thickness, visual characteristics) | Passed all |
ISO 10993 (Biocompatibility) | Compliant with ISO 10993 |
FDA's guidance for male latex condoms | Test plans developed to meet specified requirements |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not specify the exact sample size used for the performance testing. It generally refers to "the devices" being evaluated.
- Data Provenance: The testing was conducted by MAPA GmbH in Zeven, Germany. The data provenance is from internal testing reports and certificates. The studies were likely prospective, as they involved testing newly manufactured condoms to ensure compliance.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
Not applicable. This is a physical device (condom), and its performance is assessed against engineering and biological standards, not through expert consensus on medical images or diagnoses.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. Performance testing for condoms involves objective measurements and adherence to specifications, not adjudications by experts.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by the specified requirements and methodologies outlined in the ASTM D3492 standard for male latex condoms and the ISO 10993 standard for biocompatibility. These standards define the acceptable physical and biological properties.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This device does not use machine learning or AI, so there is no training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. No training set exists for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(144 days)
MAPA GMBH
The NUK® Easy-Flow™ Single Electric Breast Pump is intended. for use to express milk from the breast by a single user.
The NUK® Easy-Flow™ Single Electric Breast Pump is intended. for use to express milk from the breast by a single use. This is accomplished by an electrical diaphragm pump generating a suck and release vacuum pattern. The suction strength is adjustable. The pumping device is sealed via a connection ring to a breast shield equipped with a valve separating the breast shield from the bottle.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the NUK Breast Pump (K101157) and its acceptance criteria, focusing on the requested information.
It's important to note that the provided 510(k) summary is for a medical device that does not involve an AI/ML algorithm. Therefore, many of the requested categories related to AI performance, ground truth, and expert evaluation are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this type of document. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device and adherence to recognized safety and performance standards.
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance for NUK Easy-Flow Single Electric Breast Pump (K101157)
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Acceptance Criteria (from device specifications or recognized standards) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Intended Use | Express milk from the breast by a single user | The device is intended for use to express milk from the breast by a single user. (This implies performance meets the intended function) |
FDA Classification | 21 CFR 884.5160 (Powered breast pump) and Classification Code HGX/HGZ | Complies with 21 CFR 884.5160 and Classification Code HGZ |
Indication for Use | Powered breast pump to express milk from the breast | The NUK breast pump is intended for use to express milk from the breast of a single user. |
Intended Users | Lactating women | For use by lactating women |
Availability | Over-the-counter | Available over the counter |
Portability | Portable device | Portable |
Vacuum Range | Functionally appropriate for breast milk expression (Predicate's not specified) | Maximum 250mmHg |
Suction Mode | Adjustable | Adjustable |
Type of Pump | Electric/Battery operated | Electric/Battery |
Closed System | Yes | Yes |
Biocompatibility | ISO 10993 compliant | ISO 10993 compliant (as per performance testing) |
Electrical Safety | IEC 60601-1 / EN 60601-1 compliant (or relevant standard) | ISO 60601-1 compliant (as per performance testing) |
General Performance | Conformance with internal company specifications (comparable to predicate) | The NUK device verification testing under the company's Design Control Process has confirmed the device's conformance with specifications. |
Study Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria
The document states: "The NUK device verification testing under the company's Design Control Process has confirmed the device's conformance with specifications. The specifications do not include any significant differences from those of the predicate. Additional performance testing was completed for biocompatibility and electrical safety to recognized standards."
This indicates that internal verification and validation studies were conducted according to the company's design control processes and relevant recognized standards. The 510(k) process primarily relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a previously cleared predicate device, rather than entirely novel clinical efficacy studies.
Specifically:
- Substantial Equivalence Comparison: A detailed table compares the subject device (NUK Easy-Flow Electric Breast Pump) to the predicate device (miPump Electric Breast Pump K082802) across various specifications (FDA classification, intended use, users, portability, vacuum range, suction mode, pump type, closed system, biocompatibility, electrical safety). The conclusion is that they have "substantially equivalent intended use and technological specifications."
- Biocompatibility Testing: Confirmed compliance with ISO 10993.
- Electrical Safety Testing: Confirmed compliance with ISO 60601-1.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
Given this is a 510(k) for a hardware medical device (breast pump) and not an AI/ML diagnostic, there isn't a "test set" in the sense of a dataset for an algorithm. The "testing" refers to physical product testing and design verification.
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified in terms of a "data set" for an algorithm. It would refer to the number of physical units tested for engineering specifications, durability, etc., but this detail is not provided in a 510(k) summary (which focuses on the conclusion of testing).
- Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of an AI/ML algorithm's dataset. The "data" here would be test results from manufacturing and engineering verification, originating from the manufacturer's (MAPA GmbH, Germany) internal testing.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device requiring expert consensus for a "ground truth" dataset. The "truth" for device performance is established through engineering and safety standards.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. No expert adjudication for a data set is mentioned or relevant for this type of device.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
Not applicable. This device does not incorporate AI, therefore, no studies comparing human readers with and without AI assistance were conducted.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study
Not applicable. This device does not incorporate an AI algorithm.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
Not applicable in the context of an AI/ML algorithm. The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by engineering specifications, recognized international standards (e.g., ISO 10993 for biocompatibility, ISO 60601-1 for electrical safety), and the functional requirements for a breast pump.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device does not use a training set for an AI/ML algorithm.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable. This device does not use a training set for an AI/ML algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1