Search Results

Ceramic Etchant is intended for etching the porcelain veneers, crowns, and inlays extraorally. It is also used for pretreating the porcelain veneers, crowns, and inlays extraorally before bonding.

Not Found

I am sorry, but the provided text from the FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Ceramic Etchant (HF-5 and HF-9) does not contain any information about acceptance criteria, device performance testing, or a study that proves the device meets specific criteria in the way described in your request.

The document is a standard FDA clearance letter confirming substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It discusses regulatory compliance, general controls, quality system regulations, adverse event reporting, and unique device identification. It also includes the "Indications for Use" for the Ceramic Etchant.

The information you are looking for, such as sample size, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth, and training set details, would typically be found in the device's 510(k) summary or a more detailed biocompatibility/performance testing report submitted as part of the 510(k) application, not in the clearance letter itself.

Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions based on the provided text. The letter only states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices, which means the FDA has determined it is as safe and effective as a device already on the market. This determination is based on the information provided in the 510(k) submission, which is not fully detailed in this clearance letter.

Ask a specific question about this device

The device is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All blanks are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals.

"Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank" is derived from zirconia powder that has been processed through various molding and sintering techniques - into their final net shapes. These blanks are then further fabricated into various prosthetic dental devices intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, or for jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The zirconia powder is composed of ZrO2 , Y2O3, HfO2 and other oxides. The performance of formed zirconia dental blanks conforms to ISO 6872, Dentistry, Ceramic Materials.

"Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank" is ceramic dental blanks designed for the manufacture of ceramic dental prosthetic devices. The dental prosthetic devices are fabricated by CAD/CAM machining processes. All prosthetic dental devices are intended for single use applications. At the dental lab, the blanks are held to the CAD/CAM machine which is used to machine to the final dental restoration. At the completion of the machining steps, the dental restoration is fired (i.e., sintered) in the oven to harden the ZrO2 so that its final properties can be achieved.

"Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank" is supplied in different shapes, such as blocks, discs, rods, or customer ordered shapes. It is also supplied in the combinations of fifty different colors, gradual changing translucencies, and multi-layer aesthetic effect.

The different colors are originated from the different constituent of color additives (such as Fe2O3, Er2O3); the different translucencies are originated from small difference in the amount of Y2 O3, and the multilayer aesthetic effect is originated from the different padding method used in the process of dry pressing.

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the "Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank" and does not describe an AI/ML device.

The content explicitly states:

• "Clinical Study is not performed for this device." (Section 5.11)
• The device is a "Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank" made from zirconia powder, used for fabricating dental restorations.
• The performance testing involved non-clinical bench testing per ISO 6872:2008 for properties like radioactivity, thermal expansion, chemical solubility, and flexural strength.

Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and studies related to an AI/ML device, such as sample sizes for test/training sets, data provenance, number of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and ground truth establishment, cannot be extracted from this document as it pertains to a physical dental material, not an AI/ML software or system.

Ask a specific question about this device

"Glaze Paste, Glaze Powder, and Glaze Liquid" are indicated for use as a veneering material for fixed prosthesis in crowns and bridges. This device is used in prosthetic dentistry by forming a porcelain veneer on to a ceramic substructure.

"Glaze Paste, Glaze Powder, and Glaze Liquid" is a dental veneering material used for color staining and glazing of the surfaces of restorations such as porcelain-fused zirconia, full-contoured zirconia, or lithium disilicate. The intended use of general porcelain is to make the artificial teeth (dental prosthesis) more similar with natural teeth.

"Glaze Paste, Glaze Powder, and Glaze Liquid" are actually three products: Powder, paste, and liquid. "Glaze Powder" is in the form of a porcelain dry powder and liquid. When mixed together by the technician at a dental lab, they form the paste stain before applied to the patient.

"Glaze Paste" is pre-mixed paste from porcelain powder and liquid, which can help dental technicians save the mixing process.

The porcelain powder is composed primarily of SiO2, with minor components of Al2O3, K20, Na2O, Li2O, and color additives. The liquid is composed of deionized water and organic solvents. The liquid can also be used as a thinner to control viscosity of paste.

"Glaze Paste, Glaze Powder, and Glaze Liquid" are supplied in seventy one different colors, with or without fluorescence effect.

The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for a dental product (Glaze Paste, Glaze Powder, and Glaze Liquid), focusing on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not on proving that an AI/device meets specific clinical performance acceptance criteria. Therefore, most of the requested information regarding AI device acceptance criteria, study details, ground truth establishment, expert involvement, and MRMC studies is not available in the provided document.

However, I can extract the general acceptance criteria and performance data for the material itself, based on the regulatory standards mentioned.

Here's what can be extracted and what cannot:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document states that "Bench testing was performed per ISO 6872:2015 and internal procedures to ensure that the 'Glaze Paste, Glaze Powder, and Glaze Liquid' met its specifications. All tests were verified to meet acceptance criteria." It also mentions "Biocompatibility testing was performed to verify the equivalence of the materials that are used."

The specific numerical acceptance criteria from ISO 6872:2015 are not explicitly listed in the document. However, the document does state that the device "conforms to ISO 6872, Dentistry, Ceramic Materials" and "test results met all relevant requirements in the test standard."

For biocompatibility, the document explicitly lists that the subject device's performance met the criteria of ISO 10993.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This information is not provided in the document. The document refers to "bench testing" and "biocompatibility testing" but does not specify sample sizes for these tests, nor the data provenance beyond "internal procedures."

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

Not applicable. This is a material testing conformity rather than an AI or diagnostic device that requires expert ground truth establishment for a test set.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable, as this pertained to material performance and biocompatibility testing, not an AI or diagnostic study requiring human adjudication of results.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is not an AI or diagnostic device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is a material.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For material performance, the "ground truth" would be the chemical and physical properties as defined by the international standard ISO 6872:2015. For biocompatibility, the in vitro and in vivo test results against the criteria of ISO 10993 standards serve as the "ground truth."

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is a material, not an AI model requiring a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device