Search Results

PMMA BLOCK is used for the fabrication removable or temporary dental structures, such as crowns and bridges using milling technology using CAD/CAM.

Indications for Use:

• Temporary anterior and posterior crowns;
• Temporary anterior and posterior bridges;
• Removable structures for dentures;
• Removable structures for therapeutic restorations (night guards, bite splints or occlusal splints).

PMMA BLOCK is a circular solid (disc) or rectangular solid (block) of PMMA with or without post attachment for use in a CAD/CAM milling machine for production of provisional restorative prostheses such as dental crowns and bridges and removable dental structures. These blocks are available in a variety of shapes for different milling systems and are also available in variety of dental shades.

The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for a medical device called "PMMA BLOCK." This document describes the device, its intended use, and compares it to a predicate device to demonstrate substantial equivalence, primarily focusing on physical and chemical properties and biocompatibility.

Here's an analysis of the provided information concerning acceptance criteria and supporting studies:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
   The document does not specify the sample sizes used for the physical and chemical properties tests. It also does not explicitly state the country of origin of the test data or whether the studies were retrospective or prospective.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience):
   This information is not applicable to the type of device and testing described. The "ground truth" here is defined by international standards (ISO) for material properties. The tests are laboratory-based, measuring quantifiable physical and chemical parameters, not visual interpretations by human experts requiring "ground truth" establishment in a clinical sense.

4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
   Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in clinical studies where expert consensus is needed to establish ground truth for subjective assessments, which is not the case for these material property tests.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
   Not applicable. The device is a dental material (PMMA BLOCK), not an AI-assisted diagnostic or therapeutic tool. Therefore, MRMC studies and AI assistance comparisons are not relevant.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
   Not applicable. This question typically relates to AI algorithms. The device is a physical material, and its performance is assessed directly through laboratory testing of its physical and chemical properties according to established ISO standards. There is no algorithm involved.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
   The "ground truth" for the performance criteria is based on established international standards (ISO standards) for dental materials. These standards define the acceptable range or minimum/maximum values for various physical and chemical properties. The tests are objective measurements against these predefined benchmarks.

8. The sample size for the training set:
   Not applicable. This device is a physical product, not a machine learning model. Therefore, there is no "training set."

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
   Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of medical device submission.

Ask a specific question about this device