Search Results
Found 4 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(88 days)
Hobbs Medical, Inc.
To be utilized by a trained physician through a flexible endoscope for the collection of duodenal or jejunal fluids for diagnostic analysis.
The Hobbs Medical Aspiration Catheter is a sheath within a sheath design. The inner sheath is actuated using a proximal handle. The inner sheath is protected by an elastomeric membrane that has a slit at the distal end to allow for the inner sheath to advance. The inner sheath has three side holes at the distal tip for collection of aspirate. Once the sample is collected the inner sheath is retracted to protect the sample from contamination as it is withdrawn from the endoscope.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for an Aspiration Catheter, which is a medical device for collecting duodenal or jejunal fluids. However, the document does not contain information about a study involving an AI/Machine Learning component, nor does it provide the detailed specifics required to answer your questions about acceptance criteria, study design, ground truth, or expert involvement in the context of an AI-based device.
The document primarily focuses on demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the new Aspiration Catheter to a legally marketed predicate device (Hobbs Medical/Jayco Aspiration Catheter K844550) through physical performance testing, rather than a clinical study evaluating an AI algorithm's performance.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information based on the provided text, as it does not pertain to the development or validation of an AI/ML medical device.
Here's a breakdown of why I cannot answer each question based on the provided text:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: The document mentions "Joint integrity testing," "Deployment force testing," "Endoscope compatibility testing," "Design verification and validation," "Protection of sample from contamination," and "Shelf life testing." However, specific numerical acceptance criteria (e.g., "deployment force must be less than X N") and the quantitative results for these tests are not provided. These are engineering/device performance tests, not AI performance metrics.
- Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: No information on sample sizes for clinical or AI-specific testing is available. The provenance of any data (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is also not mentioned, as it's not a data-driven AI study.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. This document does not describe a study involving expert annotation or ground truth establishment for an AI algorithm.
- Adjudication method: Not applicable. There's no AI algorithm requiring adjudication.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness study: Not applicable. This is not an AI-assisted human reader study.
- Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) study: Not applicable. This device is not an algorithm.
- The type of ground truth used: Not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device would relate to its physical performance meeting specifications, not clinical diagnoses or classifications.
- The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. No AI training was conducted.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable. No AI training was conducted.
Ask a specific question about this device
(473 days)
Hobbs Medical, Inc.
The Pulmonary Cytology Brush is intended to allow brush sampling of tissue or cells from the upper or lower respiratory tract and/or to perform surveillance cultures
Not Found
This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification decision letter from the FDA for a device named "Pulmonary Cytology Brush." It explains that the device has been found substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device.
Crucially, this document is NOT a study report for an AI/ML medical device. It does not contain any information about acceptance criteria, device performance metrics (like sensitivity, specificity, AUC), sample sizes, expert qualifications, ground truth establishment, or any of the other details typically found in a clinical study report for an AI device.
The Pulmonary Cytology Brush is a physical medical instrument used for sampling tissue/cells, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires performance studies measuring its diagnostic or prognostic accuracy. Therefore, the requested information (acceptance criteria, study details, human reader performance, training set details) is not applicable to this document.
To answer your request, I would need a different type of document, specifically a clinical study report or a 510(k) submission summary for an AI/ML-based medical device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(306 days)
HOBBS MEDICAL, INC.
The TouchSoft™ Coagulator is used to provide therapeutic hemostasis and tissue ablation in the gastrointestinal tract through a flexible endoscope by a trained physician or clinician.
Not Found
I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance, study details, or ground truth establishment. The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the TouchSoft™ Coagulator, primarily focusing on its regulatory status and intended use. Therefore, I cannot generate the requested table and study description based on the given input.
Ask a specific question about this device
(90 days)
HOBBS MEDICAL, INC.
The Hobbs spray catheter is intended for use as a flexible endoscopic accessory to apply legally marketed solutions for washing or staining mucosal tissue.
Not Found
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Hobbs Mistifier Medical Endoscopic Spray Catheter. It is a regulatory document from the FDA acknowledging substantial equivalence to predicate devices. This type of document does not contain the acceptance criteria or a study description as requested in the prompt.
Therefore, I cannot extract the information required to populate the tables and answer the questions. The text focuses on regulatory classifications and general compliance, not on performance studies or acceptance criteria for a medical device's function.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1