Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K973466
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1997-10-24

    (70 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4580
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Hanaulux blue 75 / 120 are surgical luminaires used in the patient area and intended to illuminate locally the body of the patient. They are installed as a system of one, two or three luminaires and are intended to support the treatment and diagnosis. They are intended to be used in operating rooms and not for direct contact with patient.

    Device Description

    Hanaulux blue 75 / 120 is an Examination and Surgical Light with two lighthead combinations of blue 75 and blue 120. The Hanaulux® blue 75 / 120 is principally the same as the Hanaulux(") blue 30 / 80 in design, material and function. They are intended for illumination purpose and are not intended for therapeutic use and direct contact with the patient.

    All used plastics are molded of UL Recognized Component material.

    All internal wiring is either Listed fixture wire or Recognized Component appliance wiring material.

    The maximum of UV Irradiance is lower then 6 W / m² .

    Hanaulux® blue 80 Hospital is intended to be installed in accordance with the National Electrical Code. The system is intended to be connected to a remote, listed, isolating type, 24V transformer.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the premarket notification (510(k)) for the Heraeus Hanaulux blue 75 and Hanaulux blue 120 surgical and examination luminaires. This submission focuses on the substantial equivalence of these devices to previously marketed devices and compliance with safety standards rather than clinical performance studies. Therefore, many of the requested categories related to clinical study design and performance metrics are not applicable or cannot be extracted from the provided text.

    Here is the information that can be extracted or inferred from the provided text:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Based on the provided text, the acceptance criteria are primarily related to safety standards and functional equivalence to predicate devices, rather than specific performance metrics in a clinical context.

    Acceptance Criteria (from "Compliance with Standards")Reported Device Performance
    UL 2601 Safety of Medical Electrical EquipmentSubstantially equivalent to existing surgical lighting program HANAULUX "City" series, HANAULUX 2000 and HANAULUX blue 30 / 80.
    IEC 601-1 Safety of Medical Electrical EquipmentSubstantially equivalent to existing surgical lighting program HANAULUX "City" series, HANAULUX 2000 and HANAULUX blue 30 / 80.
    IEC 601-2-41 Safety of Surgical Luminaires and Luminaires for DiagnosisSubstantially equivalent to existing surgical lighting program HANAULUX "City" series, HANAULUX 2000 and HANAULUX blue 30 / 80.
    UL 153 Portable Electric LampsSubstantially equivalent to existing surgical lighting program HANAULUX "City" series, HANAULUX 2000 and HANAULUX blue 30 / 80.
    Maximum UV Irradiance < 6 W/m²The maximum of UV Irradiance is lower then 6 W / m².
    Use of UL Recognized Component material for plasticsAll used plastics are molded of UL Recognized Component material.
    Use of Listed fixture wire or Recognized Component appliance wiring material for internal wiringAll internal wiring is either Listed fixture wire or Recognized Component appliance wiring material.
    Intended for illumination, not therapeutic use or direct patient contactThe devices are intended for illumination purpose and are not intended for therapeutic use and direct contact with the patient.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    Not applicable. The document describes a premarket notification for a medical device (surgical/examination lights), not a clinical study involving a test set of data. The "study" mentioned here refers to compliance with standards and demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    Not applicable. As this is not a clinical study with a test set requiring ground truth, no experts were used in this capacity. The evaluation involved regulatory bodies (FDA) reviewing technical specifications and comparison to predicate devices.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable. No test set requiring expert adjudication is described.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This device is a surgical/examination luminaire; it is not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretative device, and therefore, no MRMC study was conducted.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This device is a physical medical light, not an algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    Not applicable. The "ground truth" for this regulatory submission is compliance with established electrical and medical device safety standards, and functional equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, as assessed through engineering specifications and regulatory review.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable. This is not a machine learning device or a clinical study that would involve a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable. As there is no training set mentioned, this question is not relevant.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K970886
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1997-04-16

    (69 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4580
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Not Found

    Device Description

    Hanaulux blue 80 Hospital is an Examination and Surgical Stand Light. The Hanaulux® blue 80 Hospital is principally the same as the Hanaulux® blue 80 Stand in design, material and function. The only difference is that the Hanaulux(") blue 80 Hospital is equipped with an additional bettery supply unit fitted to the stand pole and stand foot. The batteries will be charged up while the Hanaulux® blue 80 Hospital is connected to a mains supply. In case of a failure of the mains supply the light will be automatically switched over to the battery supply.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes a medical device, the HANAULUX blue 80 Hospital, which is an examination and surgical stand light. It does not describe an AI/ML powered device or a study involving such a device.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding:

    • Acceptance criteria and reported device performance related to a study. The document confirms compliance with safety standards (UL 2601, IEC 601-1, UL 153) and states a maximum UV irradiance (< 8 W/m²), but these are device specifications and regulatory compliance, not performance metrics from a study measuring accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, etc., as would be relevant for an AI/ML device.
    • Sample size used for the test set and data provenance.
    • Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications.
    • Adjudication method.
    • Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study.
    • Standalone (algorithm only) performance.
    • Type of ground truth used.
    • Sample size for the training set.
    • How ground truth for the training set was established.

    The document is a 510(k) summary for a conventional medical device, focusing on its design, function, safety standards, and substantial equivalence to existing devices. It does not mention any kind of study that would generate the type of performance data relevant to AI/ML or diagnostic devices.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K954169
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1996-02-01

    (149 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4580
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1