Search Results

The Bloom2 is intended for use in the electrophysiology laboratory during electrophysiology testing, under the direction of qualified personnel trained to administer electrophysiology procedures. The Bloom2 Cardiac Stimulator System is a programmable, electrical, pulse generator intended to provide diagnostic, electrical, cardiac stimulation. It is not intended for use, nor should it be used, as an external pacemaker for long-term support of the pacemaker dependent patient.

The Bloom2™ Cardiac Stimulator System (Bloom²) is a programmable pulse generator used for electrophysiological testing of the human heart. The Bloom² has three main components, the Bloom2 Console, the Bloom2 Stimulator Unit and the Bloom2 Increment / Decrement Floater. The Console and the Floater contain the main user controls of the system. The Console consists of a touch screen and will allow the operator to setup the functions and parameters of the system. The user interface of the Console is based on the proven and familiar interface of the Bloom DTU-215B. The Floater provides additional user controls and will provide the operator with tactile feedback on those functions that the user is expected to use while going through their protocols. The Stimulator is the heart and brains of the system. The Stimulator has four, independent output channels that have a direct connection to the patient through third party catheters.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Bloom2 Cardiac Stimulator System. It describes the device, its intended use, and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, but it does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets specific performance metrics in terms of diagnostic accuracy or clinical outcomes. Instead, it focuses on non-clinical performance and safety testing.

Therefore, most of the requested information cannot be extracted from this document, particularly regarding studies related to AI performance, expert adjudication, or ground truth establishment relevant to an AI/diagnostic device.

However, I can provide what is discussed regarding non-clinical performance:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
No information about sample size, test sets, or data provenance in the context of clinical or diagnostic performance is provided, as no such study was conducted. The non-clinical tests relate to the device itself and its components.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):
Not applicable, as no expert-adjudicated test set is detailed. The device is a stimulator, not an AI diagnostic tool requiring ground truth from medical experts in this context.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
Not applicable.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
Not applicable. This device is a cardiac stimulator, not an AI system for diagnostic image interpretation.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
Not applicable.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):
For the non-clinical tests, the "ground truth" would be the specifications and requirements of the safety and EMC standards (e.g., IEC 60601-1). The tests demonstrated that the device met these engineering and safety standards.

8. The sample size for the training set:
Not applicable, as no training set for an AI algorithm is mentioned.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device

The DTU-215 Programmable Electrophysiology Stimulator with the EPStim Electrophysiology Stimulator Control Program is indicated for patients that are candidates for electrophysiology studies for the diagnosis, and the planning of treatment of supraventricular and other miscellaneous arrhythmias.

The EPstim is intended for assisting a physician in performing an electrophysiology study by providing automated control of the DTU-215 Programmable Stimulator. The system provides for compilation, storage and rapid execution of a customized series of stimulator outputs and provides for automated detection of capture during cardiac electrophysiological testing.

The DTU-215 Programmable Stimulator is intended for use in the electrophysiology laboratory setting under the direction of qualified personnel trained to administer electrophysiological procedures.

EPStim Software and Bloom DTU Electrophysiology Program Stimulator

I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain the detailed information needed to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the EPStim Software and Bloom DTU Electrophysiology Program Stimulator.

While it states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices and outlines its "Indications for Use," it does not include:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
2. Sample size used for the test set or data provenance.
3. Number of experts and their qualifications for ground truth.
4. Adjudication method.
5. Information on any Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study or effect sizes.
6. Details about standalone algorithm performance.
7. The type of ground truth used (e.g., pathology, outcomes).
8. Sample size for the training set.
9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

The document primarily focuses on the regulatory clearance process and the intended use of the device, rather than the specifics of its performance validation testing.

Ask a specific question about this device