Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K172440
    Date Cleared
    2018-07-13

    (336 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    890.3800
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    Dongguan Prestige Sporting Goods., Ltd.

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    lt is a motor driven, indoor and outdoor transportation vehicle with the intended use to provide mobility to a disabled or elderly person limited to a seated position.

    Device Description

    The Solax Electric Scooter (Models: S302121, S302131, S302141, S302151) is an indoor/outdoor electric scooter that is intended to be used by individuals that are able to walk, but suffer from mobility limitations. It has a base with aluminum alloy frame, two front wheels, two anti-tip wheels, a seat, an adjustable steering column, a control panel, an electric motor, an electromagnetic brake, a remote for folding/unfolding the device and a Lithium battery with an off-board charger. The movement of the scooter is controlled by the rider who operates the direction control lever, speed control switch and handle on the control panel. The device is installed with an electromagnetic brake that will engage automatically when the scooter is not in use and the brake cannot be used manually.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "Solax Electric Scooter." It describes the device, its intended use, a comparison to a predicate device, and a summary of performance and safety tests.

    Here's the breakdown of the information requested, based on the provided text:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document does not explicitly present a "table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance" in the format typically associated with an AI/ML device study. Instead, it lists various ISO and IEC standards that the device was tested against to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. The "reported device performance" is implicitly that the device met the requirements of these standards.

    Here's a table based on the provided information, interpreting the standards as acceptance criteria for the respective performance aspects:

    Acceptance Criteria (Reference Standard)Reported Device Performance (Implied)
    Mechanical/Physical Performance
    ISO 7176-1: 2014, Wheelchairs Part 1: Determination of static stabilityCompliant with static stability requirements.
    ISO 7176-2:2001, Wheelchairs Part 2: Determination of dynamic stability of Powered WheelchairsCompliant with dynamic stability requirements.
    ISO 7176-3: 2012, Wheelchairs Part 3: Determination of effectiveness of brakesCompliant with brake effectiveness requirements.
    ISO 7176-4, Third edition 2008-10-01, Wheelchairs Part 4: Energy consumption of electric wheelchairs and scooters for determination of theoretical distance rangeCompliant with energy consumption and theoretical distance range determination.
    ISO 7176-5, Second edition 2008-06-01, Wheelchairs Part 5: Determination of overall dimensions, mass and manoeuvring spaceCompliant with overall dimensions, mass, and manoeuvring space requirements.
    ISO 7176-6: 2001, Wheelchairs Part 6: Determination of maximum speed, acceleration and deceleration of Powered WheelchairsCompliant with maximum speed, acceleration, and deceleration requirements.
    ISO 7176-7, First Edition 1998-05-15, Wheelchairs Part 7: Measurement of seating and wheel dimensionsCompliant with seating and wheel dimensions requirements.
    ISO 7176-8:2014, Wheelchairs Part 8: Requirements and test methods for static, impact and fatigue strengthsCompliant with static, impact, and fatigue strengths requirements.
    ISO 7176-10:2008, Wheelchairs Part 10: Determination of obstacle-climbing ability of electrically powered wheelchairsCompliant with obstacle-climbing ability requirements.
    ISO 7176-11, Second edition 2012-12-01, Wheelchairs Part 11: Test dummiesCompliant with test dummy specifications (implies proper testing methodology).
    ISO 7176-13, First edition 1989-08-01, Wheelchairs Part 13: Determination of friction of test surfacesCompliant with friction of test surfaces (implies proper testing methodology).
    Electrical/Control Systems Performance
    ISO 7176-14:2008, Wheelchairs Part 14: Power and control systems for electrically powered wheelchairs and scooters - Requirements and test methodsCompliant with power and control systems requirements.
    ISO 7176-21 Second edition 2009-04-01 Wheelchairs Part 21: Requirements and test methods for electromagnetic compatibility of electrically powered wheelchairs and scooters, and battery chargersCompliant with electromagnetic compatibility requirements.
    Environmental Performance
    ISO 7176-9:2009, Wheelchairs Part 9: Climatic tests for Powered WheelchairsCompliant with climatic test requirements.
    Biocompatibility
    ISO 10993-5:2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: Tests for In Vitro cytotoxicityAll user-contacting materials compliant with In Vitro cytotoxicity requirements.
    ISO 10993-10: 2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 10: Tests for irritation and delayed-type hypersensitivityAll user-contacting materials compliant with irritation and delayed-type hypersensitivity requirements.
    Software/Usability
    IEC 62304: 2006 (First Edition), Medical device software, Software life- cycle processes.Compliant with medical device software life-cycle processes.
    IEC 60601-1-6 Medical electrical equipment-Part1-6: General requirements for safety-Collateral Standard: Usability Edition 3.0, 2010Compliant with usability requirements for medical electrical equipment.
    IEC 62366 Medical devices Application of usability engineering to medical devices Edition 1.0, 2007Compliant with usability engineering application for medical devices.
    Labeling/Documentation
    ISO 7176-15:1996, Wheelchairs Part 15: Requirements for information disclosure, documentation and labelingCompliant with information disclosure, documentation, and labeling requirements.
    Material Safety
    ISO 7176-16, Second edition 2012-12-01, Wheelchairs Part 16: Resistance to ignition of postural support devicesCompliant with resistance to ignition of postural support devices.

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document refers to "performance and safety tests" but does not specify the sample size for these tests. It is implied that tests were performed on the device itself (Solax Electric Scooter models S302121, S302131, S302141, S302151). This is a physical device, not an AI/ML algorithm processing data.

    The data provenance is industrial testing of a physical product. The submitter is Dongguan Prestige Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. from China. The types of tests (ISO standards) are generally standardized laboratory or field tests.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    This information is not applicable. The device is a physical electric scooter, not an AI/ML diagnostic or predictive tool that requires expert consensus for ground truth on a test set. The "ground truth" for its performance is determined by adherence to the engineering and safety standards listed.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like '2+1' or '3+1' are typically used in clinical studies involving multiple readers for diagnostic tasks (e.g., radiologists interpreting images) to establish a consensus ground truth. This document describes the testing of a physical medical device against established engineering standards.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This information is not applicable. A MRMC comparative effectiveness study is relevant for AI/ML diagnostic or imaging devices where human performance with and without AI assistance is being evaluated. The Solax Electric Scooter is a physical mobility device and does not involve human readers interpreting data.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    This information is not applicable. The Solax Electric Scooter is a physical device, not a standalone algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    The "ground truth" for the Solax Electric Scooter's performance is compliance with established international engineering and safety standards (ISO and IEC standards). These standards define performance limits and test methodologies, and the device is evaluated against these predefined criteria rather than a subjective "expert consensus" or biological "pathology" data set.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable. The device is a physical product, not an AI/ML model that requires a "training set."

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable. As stated above, the device is not an AI/ML model requiring a training set with established ground truth.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1