Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K990087
    Date Cleared
    1999-05-13

    (122 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.1800
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    DENTAL/MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DMD Digital X-ray is used to collect dental x-ray photons and convert them into electronic impulses that may be stored, viewed, and manipulated for diagnostic use by dentists.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text only contains an FDA clearance letter for a device called "DMD Digital X-Ray System" and its indications for use. It does not include acceptance criteria, study details, or performance data as requested in your prompt. Therefore, I cannot generate the specific information about acceptance criteria and study proving device performance based on the given input.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K981948
    Device Name
    APOLLO 95E
    Date Cleared
    1998-08-18

    (76 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3690
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    DENTAL/MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Apollo 95E produces visible light for the polymerization of dental materials and for tooth whitening.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    I apologize, but the provided text from the FDA 510(k) letter for the Apollo 95E device does not contain the specific information requested regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment.

    The document is a clearance letter indicating that the FDA has reviewed the device and determined it to be substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device. It defines the "Indications For Use" for the Apollo 95E as producing visible light for the polymerization of dental materials and for tooth whitening.

    However, it does not include:

    • A table of acceptance criteria or reported device performance.
    • Details about a study to prove the device meets acceptance criteria.
    • Sample sizes for test or training sets.
    • Information on expert qualifications or adjudication methods.
    • Whether MRMC or standalone performance studies were conducted.
    • The type of ground truth used.

    This type of information would typically be found in the 510(k) submission itself, which is a much more extensive document that includes details of testing and performance data. The letter provided is merely the FDA's decision based on that submission.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K980474
    Device Name
    TELICAM
    Date Cleared
    1998-04-13

    (66 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6640
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    DENTAL/MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Non diagnostic intraoral camera used by dentists to illuminate and magnify dental surfaces.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a device named "Telicam," described as a "Non diagnostic intraoral camera used by dentists to illuminate and magnify dental surfaces." This document is a regulatory approval, not a scientific study report. Therefore, it does not contain any information about acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, or comparative effectiveness studies.

    The letter explicitly states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices, which is the basis for its clearance, rather than a demonstration of meeting specific performance criteria through a study described within this document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1