Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K132642
    Date Cleared
    2013-10-03

    (38 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Applicant Name (Manufacturer) :

    BEIJING LIBEIER BIO-ENGINEERING INSTITUTE CO., LTD

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Locking Plate System can be used for adult patients with age above 21 as indicated for fixation of fractures, including ulna, radius, humerus, femur tibia and fibula.

    Device Description

    The proposed products, Locking Plate System, contain (1) locking plates (1.Ps) with various specifications. (2) locking screws with various specifications and (3) various specific instruments. Locking Plates are the plates that made of Titanium. The limited-contact design of LPs reduces plate-to-bone contact, thus limiting vascular trauma. The screws are available in three kinds, which are 3.5mm Hexagonal Locking Screws with hexagonal interface, 3.5mm Stardrive Locking Screws with Torx interface, and 5.0mm Locking Screws with hexagonal interface. There are various instruments specific to the proposed device intend for completing the surgery.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for a Locking Plate System, which is a Class II medical device. The submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through non-clinical testing.

    Here's an analysis of the provided text based on your request:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Standard)Reported Device Performance (Test Results)
    ASTM F382-99 (Reapproved 2008), Standard Specification and Test Method for Metallic Bone PlatesPerformance tested: Static and Dynamic Performance tested per ASTM F382. (Implicitly, the device met the specifications of this standard to claim substantial equivalence.)
    ASTM F543-07, Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone ScrewsPerformance tested: Torsional, Driving Torque and Pull out strength tested per ASTM F543. (Implicitly, the device met the specifications of this standard to claim substantial equivalence.)
    ISO 17665-1:2006 Sterilization of health care products- Moist heat, Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routing control of a sterilization process for medical devicesPerformance met: "The test results demonstrated that the proposed device complies with the following standards." (Specifically implied for sterilization, as the device is supplied non-sterile and "Subject to steam sterilized prior to use.")

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document explicitly states: "No clinical study is included in this submission."
    Therefore, there is no patient-specific test set, sample size, or data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) related to clinical outcomes. All testing was non-clinical (laboratory/bench testing).

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    Not applicable. As no clinical studies were performed, there was no need for experts to establish ground truth from patient data. The "ground truth" for non-clinical testing is adherence to established engineering standards (ASTM and ISO).

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. No clinical studies were performed, so no adjudication method for human decisions on patient cases was required.

    5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device. It's a hardware medical device (bone plates and screws), and no MRMC studies or AI involvement are mentioned.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This is not an algorithm/software device.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for this submission are the performance requirements and specifications defined by the referenced international standards (ASTM F382, ASTM F543, ISO 17665-1). The non-clinical tests' goal was to demonstrate compliance with these established engineering standards.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. There is no training set mentioned, as this is not a machine learning or AI device.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

    Not applicable. There is no training set for this type of device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1