Search Results

The Model 300157 CPAP System is a single patient reusable device. The Model 300157 CPAP System provides continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to support treatment of adults (over 30 kg) with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

The CPAP System provides a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to support treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. When interfaced with a CPAP Mask or CPAP Patient Interface the CPAP System provides a constant pressure of 4 to 20 cmHzO above the ambient atmospheric pressure to patient's nasal airway. This constant pressure, when set to a therapeutic level as prescribed by a physician, supports retaining an open airway during sleep. The CPAP System has primary components: 1) CPAP main unit, 2) Removable headgear, 3) External power supply/optional mobile power adaptor, and 4) Patient Interface.

This document is a 510(k) summary for a CPAP system, not a study report. Therefore, it does not contain the detailed information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria.

A 510(k) submission primarily demonstrates "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device, which often relies on performance testing to show that the new device performs as safely and effectively as the predicate. However, the provided text only states that "Laboratory and standards compliance were provided to support the CPAP System performance," without detailing what those specific tests were, what the acceptance criteria for those tests were, or the results of those tests.

Therefore, I cannot provide most of the requested information based on the input text.

Here's what can be extracted and what cannot:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

• Cannot be provided. The document does not define specific acceptance criteria (e.g., pressure accuracy, flow rates, noise levels) or report specific performance metrics against such criteria. It only generally states "Laboratory and standards compliance were provided to support the CPAP System performance."

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):

• Cannot be provided. No information about sample sizes for any test set or data provenance is mentioned.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):

• Cannot be provided. This type of information is relevant for studies involving human interpretation (e.g., medical imaging AI), which is not the nature of this device or document. The CPAP system's performance would primarily be evaluated through engineering and clinical performance tests, not ground truth established by experts in a diagnostic context.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

• Cannot be provided. Not applicable to this type of device submission.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• Cannot be provided. Not applicable to a standalone CPAP device. MRMC studies are typically for AI-assisted diagnostic tools.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

• While the device itself is "standalone" in its operation, the document doesn't detail performance studies. It states "Laboratory and standards compliance were provided," implying technical performance testing rather than a specific "standalone study" report in the context of an algorithm. However, its intended function is continuous positive airway pressure delivery, which is an "algorithm only" type of function in terms of consistent pressure delivery. No performance data is given.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):

• Cannot be provided. The concept of "ground truth" as typically used in this context (e.g., for AI model training or evaluation in diagnostics) is not directly applicable here. Performance would be assessed against established engineering standards and clinical efficacy, not an expert-derived ground truth.

8. The sample size for the training set:

• Cannot be provided. This device is a hardware system, not typically an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set" in the conventional sense. Its design and manufacturing would adhere to engineering principles and standards.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

• Cannot be provided. See point 8.

In summary, the provided text is a regulatory summary (510(k)) for a medical device and not a detailed study report. It focuses on the device's description, intended use, technology, and claim of substantial equivalence, rather than providing the granular data from performance studies.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Headrest® with Nasal Seal is a reusable accessory to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices, which are applied to treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea with CPAP or Bi-Level CPAP therapy.

The Headrest® with Nasal Seal is an accessory to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices, which are applied to treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea with CPAP or Bi-Level CPAP. The Headrest® with Nasal Seal is initially used under the direct supervision of a trained medical professional. The Headrest® with Nasal Seal function and applications are applied in a clinical or home setting when the patient is treated for obstructive sleep apnea by the application of CPAP therapy. The Headrest® with Nasal Seal has three significant components: 1) Headrest, 2) Nasal Seal, and 3) Tubing. The Headrest holds the device Tubing and the Nasal Seal in place on the user's head. The Headrest is adjustable by the user. The Nasal Seal is made from a silicone material which connects to the Headrest. The Nasal Seal provides the airflow pathway to the user's nasal openings. The Tubing connects to the CPAP System. The Tubing and Headrest pass the constant air pressure of the CPAP System to the Nasal Seal. The Headrest allows the positioning of the Nasal Seal for the comfort of the user. The Headrest and Nasal Seal are reusable components. The Tubing is single patient use.

This document is a 510(k) summary for the AEIOMed Reusable Headrest® with Nasal Seal, an accessory for CPAP devices used to treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea. It covers the device description, intended use, technology, and conclusion of substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, it does not provide the detailed information required to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria, as requested in the prompt.

Specifically, the document does not provide information on:

• A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
• Sample size used for the test set or its data provenance.
• Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
• Adjudication method for the test set.
• Whether a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, or any effect size.
• Whether a standalone (algorithm only) performance study was done.
• The type of ground truth used.
• Sample size for the training set.
• How ground truth for the training set was established.

The document mentions "Laboratory testing and guidance document compliance were provided to support the reusable Headrest with Nasal Seal Instructions for cleaning and disinfection, and performance after cleaning and disinfection." However, it does not detail the nature of this "laboratory testing," the specific metrics or acceptance criteria used, or the results. It only states that the device "continued to meet specifications" after 30 cleaning and disinfection cycles, which is a very high-level statement without supporting data.

Conclusion:
Based on the provided text, it is not possible to answer the detailed questions regarding acceptance criteria and the specifics of the study proving device performance. The document focuses on regulatory summary and substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than a detailed performance study report.

Ask a specific question about this device