(220 days)
This kit is intended for the quantitative determination of immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) in blood specimens dried on filter paper as an aid in screening newborns for cystic fibrosis.
The DELFIA® Neonatal immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) assay is a solid phase, two-site fluoro-immunometric assay based on the direct sandwich technique in which two monoclonal antibodies (derived from mice) are directed against two separate antigenic determinants on the IRT molecule. Standards, controls and test specimens containing IRT are reacted simultaneously with immobilised monoclonal antibodies directed against a specific antigenic site on the IRT molecule and europium-labelled monoclonal antibodies (directed against a different antigenic site) in assay buffer. The assay buffer elutes IRT from the dried blood spots on the filter paper discs. The complete assay requires only one incubation step. Enhancement Solution dissociates europium ions from the labelled antibody into solution where they form highly fluorescent chelates with components of the Enhancement Solution. The fluorescence in each well is then measured. The fluorescence of each sample is proportional to the concentration of IRT in the sample.
This describes the acceptance criteria and study information for the DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit. It focuses on the comparison between the DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit and the predicate device, Trypsik 125I RIA kit, and mentions a comparison with the sweat chloride test for cystic fibrosis diagnosis.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document describes performance characteristics rather than explicit "acceptance criteria" for a study validating its ability to screen for cystic fibrosis against a gold standard. However, it does provide performance metrics in comparison to a predicate device.
| Performance Metric | DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit (Reported Performance) | Trypsik 125I RIA kit (Reported Performance of Predicate) |
|---|---|---|
| Precision (C.V. %) | 6.3 - 12 C.V. % | 5.4 - 9.6 C.V. % |
| Detection limit | 4 ng/mL blood | 2.5 ng/mL serum |
| Standard range | 0 - 1000 ng/mL blood | 0 - 400 ng/mL serum |
The document states that the "performance of the kits is equivalent" and "the correlation between the two kits is good," suggesting these were the implicit acceptance criteria for substantial equivalence to the predicate.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the test set or the data provenance for the comparison with the Trypsik 125I RIA kit. It mentions a comparison "with the sweat chloride test which is considered the standard for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis," but details on the sample size and data provenance for this comparison are not provided.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications:
This information is not provided in the document. The substantial equivalence argument relies on comparison to a legally marketed predicate device and a "standard" diagnostic test (sweat chloride test). There's no mention of experts establishing a ground truth for a test set.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
This information is not provided in the document.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance:
This document describes an in vitro diagnostic kit, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers. Therefore, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study regarding human readers with or without AI assistance is not applicable and was not performed.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done:
The DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit is a diagnostic assay itself, performed in a lab setting. Its performance is inherent to the kit, and the provided performance metrics (precision, detection limit) are standalone performance measures of the kit.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
For the primary comparison (substantial equivalence to the predicate device), the "ground truth" seems to be the performance and correlation with the legally marketed predicate device (Trypsik 125I RIA kit).
For the secondary comparison (aid in screening for cystic fibrosis), the sweat chloride test is stated as "considered the standard for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis." This implies that sweat chloride test results would serve as the ground truth for evaluating the DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit's utility as a screening aid for cystic fibrosis.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
The concept of a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI is not applicable to this in vitro diagnostic kit. The document does not describe a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
As there is no training set in the context of this document, this information is not applicable.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the PerkinElmer logo. The logo consists of a stylized "P" with a triangle shape to the right of the vertical line, followed by the text "PerkinElmer" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below "PerkinElmer" are the words "life sciences." in a smaller font. The letters "TM" are to the right of the word "Elmer".
JUN - 9 2001
Premarket Notification DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit
510(k) SUMMARY
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is: K993697
| Date: | May 8, 2000 |
|---|---|
| Submitter: | Wallac OyMustionkatu 620750 Turku, Finland |
| Telephone: | +358-2-2678111 |
| Fax: | +358-2-2678357 |
| Contact person: | Gunnel LaaksonenMgr RA |
| Trade Name: | DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit |
| Common Name: | Fluoroimmunoassay for the determination ofimmunoreactive trypsin |
| Classification Name: | Trypsin test system |
| Predicate Device: | Trypsik 125 I RIA kit (K 791202) |
Device Description:
The DELFIA® Neonatal immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) assay is a solid phase, two-site fluoro-immunometric assay based on the direct sandwich technique in which two monoclonal antibodies (derived from mice) are directed against two separate antigenic determinants on the IRT molecule. Standards, controls and test specimens containing IRT are reacted simultaneously with immobilised monoclonal antibodies directed against a specific antigenic site on the IRT molecule and europium-labelled monoclonal antibodies (directed against a different antigenic site) in assay buffer. The assay buffer elutes IRT from the dried blood spots on the filter paper discs. The complete assay requires only one incubation step. Enhancement Solution dissociates europium ions from the labelled antibody into solution where they form highly fluorescent chelates with components of the Enhancement Solution. The fluorescence in each well is then measured. The fluorescence of each sample is proportional to the concentration of IRT in the sample.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image shows the PerkinElmer logo. The logo consists of a black square with a triangle pointing to the right on top of the name "PerkinElmer" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the name, in a smaller font, are the words "life sciences."
510(k) Summary Cont'd
Intended Use:
This kit is intended for the quantitative determination of immunoreactive trypsin This kit is intenced for ens dried on filter paper as an aid in screening newborns for cystic fibrosis.
Substantial equivalence:
The DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit (Wallac Oy) was compared to the Trypsik 1251 RIA kit (Sorin Biomedica) currently distributed by DiaSorin in the US. Following similarities and differences were found:
Similarities:
- They are both intended for the measurement of immunoreactive trypsin (IRT). .
- They are both based on the immunoassay principle. -
- The performance of the kits is equivalent. -
- The correlation between the two kits is good. -
Differences:
- The intended use is the main difference between the two kits. The DELFIA® -Neonatal IRT kit is used to measure IRT concentrations in blood spots as an aid in screening newborns for cystic fibrosis, while the Trypsik 1251 RIA kit is used to measure IRT concentrations in serum or plasma for the diagnosis of and treatment of pancreatic disease.
- The DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit uses europium labelled tracer, which allows quantitation of IRT by fluorescence measurement, while the Trypsik 125 RIA kit uses the 1251 labelled tracer and measures radioactivity.
| DELFIA Neonatal IRT kit | Trypsik 125I RIA kit | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended use | Determination of IRT forscreening newborns for cysticfibrosis | Determination of IRT fordiagnosis of and treatment ofpancreatic disease |
| Principle | Immunoassay | Immunoassay |
| Method | Time resolved fluorometry | Radioactivity |
| Sample | Dried blood spot | Serum and plasma |
| Standard range | 0-1000 ng/mL blood | 0 - 400 ng/mL serum |
| Precision | 6.3 - 12 C.V. % | 5.4-9.6 C.V. % |
| Detection limit | 4 ng/mL blood | 2.5 ng/mL serum |
The Similarities and differences are shown in the following table:
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for PerkinElmer life sciences. The logo consists of a black vertical bar with a triangle pointing to the right above the text "PerkinElmer life sciences.". The "TM" symbol is located to the right of "Elmer".
Premarket Notification DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit
510(k) Summary Cont'd
The DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit is substantially equivalent to the Trypsik 1251 RIA kit, when considering the principles and the technical performance of the two kits. The main difference between the kits is the intended use. The identification of the new main allierents of the test is a result of the evolution of medical practice and we believe that there is today enough clinical evidence to show the usefulness of the determination of IRT as an aid in screening newborns for cystic fibrosis.
In addition the DELFIA Neonatal IRT kit (Wallac Oy) was compared with the sweat chloride test which is considered the standard for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.
The sweat chloride test for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis involves three steps:
Sweat stimulation (e.g. Wescor Sweat Inducer, K853973) Sweat collection (e.g. Wescor Sweat collection system, K840472) Quantitative sweat analysis for chloride, sodium, or both (e.g. Wescor Sweat Analyzer, K863395)
Localized sweating can be produced by the iontophoresis of the cholinergic drug pilocarpine nitrate into an area of skin. Iontophoresis uses an electric voltage so that an ionized drug carries current into the skin. The positively charged pilocarpine ions move away from the positive electrode and into the skin where they stimulate the sweat glands. After stimulation the sweat can be collected either by gause or filter paper or by microbore tubing. After the collection of an adequate amount of sweat it can be analyzed for chloride, sodium, or both. Chloride determinations provide greater discrimination and represents the most popular analyte in the United States.
Similarities and differences:
The DELFIA Neonatal IRT kit measures the concentration of immunoreactive trypsine in blood specimens while the sweat test measures the concentration of chloride in sweat.
Although the test principles are different they are both intended for the detection of cystic fibrosis. The DELFIA Neonatal IRT kit is used as a means of identifying a population of newborns who are at increased risk of having CF and the sweat chloride test is considered the standard for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo features a stylized eagle with three swooping lines representing its wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle.
JUN - 9 2000
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Gunnel Laaksonen Manager of Regulatory Affairs PerkinElmer Life Sciences Wallac Oy P.O. Box 10 FIN-20101 Turku. FINLAND
Re: K993697
Trade Name: DELFIA Neonatal IRT Kit Regulatory Class: II Product Code: CGZ Dated: May 22, 2000 Received: May 24, 2000
Dear Mr. Laaksonen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally partities predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Butman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for EG&G WALLAC. The logo consists of a stylized symbol on the left, followed by the text "EG&G WALLAC" in bold, sans-serif font. The text is slightly slanted upwards from left to right. The overall impression is of a corporate logo for a company in the technology or engineering sector.
12. INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name:
K 993697
DELFIA® Neonatal IRT kit
Indications For Use:
This kit is intended for the quantitative determination of immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) in blood specimens dried on filter paper as an aid in screening newborns for cystic fibrosis.
Jean Coopn
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K993697
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use (Optional Format 1-2-96)
§ 862.1170 Chloride test system.
(a)
Identification. A chloride test system is a device intended to measure the level of chloride in plasma, serum, sweat, and urine. Chloride measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte and metabolic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and diabetic acidosis.(b)
Classification. Class II.