(49 days)
Not Found
Not Found
No
The provided 510(k) summary contains no mention of AI, ML, image processing, or any other technology typically associated with AI/ML in medical devices. The intended use is purely for fabrication, which is a mechanical process.
No
The device is used for the "Fabrication of Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Dental Crowns, Bridges and Implant-supported Prosthesis Substructures," which are restorative materials, not therapeutic devices that treat a disease or condition.
No
The intended use describes the device as being for the "Fabrication of Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Dental Crowns, Bridges and Implant-supported Prosthesis Substructures," which indicates it is used for manufacturing dental prosthetics, not for diagnosing medical conditions.
Unknown
The provided 510(k) summary lacks crucial information about the device description. Without knowing the nature of the device and how it achieves its intended use (fabrication of dental prosthetics), it's impossible to determine if it's software-only or involves hardware.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is for the "Fabrication of Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Dental Crowns, Bridges and Implant-supported Prosthesis Substructures." This describes a process for creating dental prosthetics, which are medical devices used in the body, not for testing samples from the body.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: The description does not mention any of the typical characteristics of an IVD, such as:
- Analyzing samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.)
- Detecting or measuring substances in samples
- Providing information for diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment decisions based on sample analysis.
Therefore, based solely on the provided text, this device falls under the category of a dental prosthetic fabrication device, not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
For use in the Fabrication of Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Dental Crowns, Bridges and Implant-supported Prosthesis Substructures.
Product codes
EJS
Device Description
Not Found
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies
Not Found
Key Metrics
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Not Found
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 872.3060 Noble metal alloy.
(a)
Identification. A noble metal alloy is a device composed primarily of noble metals, such as gold, palladium, platinum, or silver, that is intended for use in the fabrication of cast or porcelain-fused-to-metal crown and bridge restorations.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special control for these devices is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Dental Noble Metal Alloys.” The devices are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9. See § 872.1(e) for availability of guidance information.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is often associated with healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus. The logo is black and white.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
DEC - 2 1999
Mr. Kenneth A. Putney Vice President, General Manaqer Official Correspondent Metalor Dental USA Corporation 255 John L. Dietsch Boulevard P.O. Box 255 North Attleborough, Massachusetts 02761-0255
K993474 Re : Deltapal, Alloy No. 5161 Trade Name: Regulatory Class: II Product Code: EJS Dated: October 11, 1999 Received: October 14, 1999
Dear Mr. Putney:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. ਮ substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practice for Medical Devices: General (GMP) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any
1
Page 2 - Mr. Putney
obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4692. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Patricio Cucentiffer
Timothy A. Ulatowski Director Division of Dental, Infection Control and General Hospital Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
| 510(k) Number (if known): | K993474 |
|---|---|
| Page |
Deltapal
Indications For Use:
Device Name:
For use in the Fabrication of Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Dental Crowns, Bridges and Implant-supported Prosthesis Substructures.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription use _ L (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use (Optional Format 1-2-96)
Susan Runns
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Dental, Infection Control, And General Hospital Devices Son 3 Y E 1 O(k) Number ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4-3