(65 days)
The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottles are used with the BacT/ALERT Microbial Detection Systems in qualitative procedures for enhanced recovery and detection of anaerobic microorganisms from blood and other normally sterile body fluids.
The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle was developed for the same intended use as the current BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle, to provide suitable nutritional and environmental conditions for organisms commonly encountered in blood infections and normally sterile body fluids. An inoculated bottle is placed into the BacT/ALERT Microbial Detection Instrument where it is incubated and continously monitored for the presence of microorganisms that will grow in the BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle.
Here's an analysis of the provided text to extract the requested information regarding the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:
1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Recovery of anaerobic organisms from human blood | Equivalent to the predicate device (BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle) |
| Time to detection of anaerobic organisms | Equivalent to the predicate device (BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated, but the study involved "low levels of eleven anaerobic organisms diluted in human blood." The number of samples (bottles) per organism or per blood sample is not provided.
- Data Provenance: The data was generated through "seeded studies" using "human blood." The country of origin is not specified, but the submission is to the FDA in the USA. Given this, it's a prospective study conducted specifically for this submission.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. This device is a diagnostic tool for microbial growth. The "ground truth" for the test set would be the confirmed presence and identity of the seeded anaerobic organisms, which is determined by standard microbiological culture and identification methods, not expert reader consensus.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
Not applicable. As described above, the ground truth for microbial growth detection is based on the inherent biology and laboratory confirmation of the seeded organisms, not expert adjudication of images or diagnoses.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a fully automated microbial detection system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that aids human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Yes, a standalone study was performed. The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle, in conjunction with the BacT/ALERT Microbial Detection Instrument, operates automatically to detect microbial growth. The study compared the performance of this system (BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle + Instrument) directly against the predicate device's system (BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle + Instrument).
7. The type of ground truth used
The ground truth was established by seeding known anaerobic organisms into human blood at "low levels" and then measuring their recovery and time to detection. This is essentially a controlled laboratory setup where the presence and type of microorganism are known beforehand.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This document describes a new iteration of an existing diagnostic culture bottle, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a training set in the conventional sense. The "training" for the device would have been its design and development based on established microbiological principles.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. See point 8.
{0}------------------------------------------------
SEP 2 4 1999
510(k) Premarket Notification Organon Teknika Corporation BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle
510(k) Summary
The submitter's name, address, telephone number, a contact person, and the date the (a)(1) summary was prepared;
Submitter's Name: Organon Teknika Corporation
Submitter's Address: 100 Akzo Avenue Durham, North Carolina 27712
Submitter's Telephone: (919) 620-2288
Submitter's Contact: Rebecca A. Rivas
Date 510(k) Summary Prepared: July 19, 1999
- (a)(2) ( The name of the device, including the trade or proprietary name if applicable, the common or usual name, and the classification name, if known;
Trade or Proprietary Name: BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle
Common or Usual Name: BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle
Classification Name: Microbial Growth Monitor
- An identification of the legally marketed device to which the submitter claims substantial (a)(3) equivalence;
Device Equivalent to: BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle
(a)(4) A description of the device.
The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle was developed for the same Device Description: intended use as the current BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle, to provide suitable nutritional and environmental conditions for organisms commonly encountered in blood infections and normally sterile body fluids. An inoculated bottle is placed into the BacT/ALERT Microbial Detection Instrument where it is incubated and continously monitored for the presence of microorganisms that will grow in the BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle.
- (a)(5) A statement of the intended use of the device.
Device Intended Use: The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottles are used with the BacT/ALERT Microbial Detection Systems in qualitative procedures for enhanced recovery and detection of anaerobic microorganisms from blood and other normally sterile body fluids.
{1}------------------------------------------------
(a)(6) A summary of the technological characteristics of the new device in comparison to those of the predicate device.
The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle utilizes the same detection technology as the BacT/ALERT FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle.
| FEATURES | BACT/ALERT FN CULTURE BOTTLE | BACT/ALERT FANANAEROBIC CULTUREBOTTLE |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Reflectance | Reflectance |
| Color change based onCO₂ production | YES | YES |
| Sensor | Emulsion | Disc |
| Indicator material | Yes, Same as FAN AnaerobicBottle | Yes |
| Growth ofmicroorganisms | Yes, Equivalent to FAN AnaerobicBottle | Yes |
| Instrument Used | BacT/ALERT Microbial Detection Systems | BacT/ALERT MicrobialDetection Systems |
| Sample Source | Blood, Body Fluids | Blood, Body Fluids |
| Target Population | Adult | Adult |
1998
: : .
{2}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Premarket Notification Organon Teknika Corporation BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle
A brief discussion of the nonclinical tests submitted, referenced, or relied on in the (b)1) premarket notification submission for a determination of substantial equivalency.
Testing was performed to establish the performance characteristics of the new device including:
Seeded studies were performed on eleven anaerobic organisms diluted in human blood. The inoculums were seeded into the BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle and the BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle. Recovery of the seeded organisms were compared between the two culture bottles.
(b)3) The conclusions drawn from the nonclinical and clinical tests that demonstrate that the device is as safe, as effective, and performed as well or better than the legally marketed device identified in (a)(3).
The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle has the same intended use and uses the same detection methodology as the predicate device, the current BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle. BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle was found to be substantially equivalent to the BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle based on recovery of low levels of eleven anaerobic organisms. Times to detection were also equivalent between both the BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle and the predicate device, the current BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic Culture Bottle.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo features a stylized eagle with three wavy lines representing its body and wings. The eagle is enclosed in a circle, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the circumference of the circle.
SEP 2 4 1999
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Rebecca A. Rivas Regulatory Affairs Administrator Organon Teknika Corporation 100 Akzo Avenue Durham, North Carolina 27712
Re: K992432 Trade Name: BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle Regulatory Class: I Product Code: MDB Dated: July 20, 1999 Received: July 21, 1999
Dear Ms. Rivas:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (OS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic OS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits vour device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Butman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Premarket Notification Organon Teknika Corporation BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle
| Page | __________ of __________ |
|---|---|
| ------ | -------------------------- |
| 510(k) Number (If known): | K992432 |
|---|---|
| --------------------------- | --------- |
BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottle
Device Name:
Indications For Usa:
The BacT/ALERT FN Culture Bottles are used with the BacT/ALERT Microbial Detection Systems in qualitative procedures for enhanced recovery and detection of anaerobic microorganisms from blood and other normally sterile body fluids.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Woody Dubose
ical Laboratory Devices Division of C 510(k) Number
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
ଠାର
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-98)
§ 866.2560 Microbial growth monitor.
(a)
Identification. A microbial growth monitor is a device intended for medical purposes that measures the concentration of bacteria suspended in a liquid medium by measuring changes in light scattering properties, optical density, electrical impedance, or by making direct bacterial counts. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms.(b)
Classification. Class I. With the exception of automated blood culturing system devices that are used in testing for bacteria, fungi, and other microorganisms in blood and other normally sterile body fluids, this device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter.