(21 days)
Not Found
Not Found
No
The description focuses on light scattering technology and microparticle agglutination for antibody detection, with no mention of AI or ML in the device description, intended use, or performance studies.
No
The device is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay designed for qualitative or semiquantitative detection of antibodies to EBV antigens to aid in the diagnosis of EBV-associated mononucleosis. It does not provide any therapeutic intervention.
Yes
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states that the assay is "used as an aid in the diagnosis of EBV associated mononucleosis."
No
The device description clearly details a physical assay using microparticles, reaction wells, and an instrument with light scattering technology. This involves significant hardware components and is not solely software.
Yes, this device is an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use explicitly states that the assay is designed for human serum and is used as an aid in the diagnosis of EBV associated mononucleosis. This clearly indicates it's used to test samples taken from the human body to provide information about a disease state.
- Device Description: The description details a test that analyzes patient samples (human serum) to detect the presence of antibodies, which are biological markers.
- Performance Studies: The performance studies involve testing human samples from different disease states and comparing the results to other serological tests (like IFA and heterophile tests), which are standard IVD methods.
These points align with the definition of an In Vitro Diagnostic device, which is used to examine specimens derived from the human body to provide information for diagnostic, monitoring, or compatibility purposes.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay uses Coupled Particle Light Scattering technology in a micropaticle agglutination-based assay for the qualitative or semiquantitative detection of antibodies to EBV VCA (total antibodies), EBNA (IgG), and EA (IgG and IgM) antigens. The assay is designed for human serum using the Copalis® I Immunoassay System. The presence of VCA, EBNA and EA antibodies is used as an aid in the diagnosis of EBV associated mononucleosis when used in conjunction with other EBV serologies in pediatric, adult, transplant donor and transplant recipient populations. The disease state distinction is made based on the antibody pattern of reactivity. When evaluating properly paired sera, the results of these assays are used to demonstrate seroconversion or significant change in antibody titer as evidence of recent infection. Both specimens should be tested simultaneously.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
LSE
Device Description
Coupled Particle Light Scattering (Copalis®) technology provides a rapid method for the measurement of antibodies to specific pathogens. The Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay is a microparticle agglutination test using the Copalis® light scattering technology. Polystyrene microparticles of 3 sizes are coated with VCA synthetic peptide, EBNA recombinant antigen or EA recombinant antigen and are contained within a special covered reaction well in the test cup. The dried reagent is reconstituted with a reaction buffer on the instrument at the start of the assay. Patient sample is added to the reaction mixture and incubated for 10 minutes. The presence of antibodies specific to EBV antigens in the patient sample results in agglutination of the monomer microparticles to form aggregates. The reaction mixture is passed through a flow cell and the instrument uses light scattering technology to measure the monomer concentration. The decrease in the monomer population resulting from agglutination is related to the amount of antibody in the sample. The residual monomer concentration in each reaction mixture is compared to a cutoff value to determine sample reactivity and nonreactivity.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
pediatric, adult
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Clinical Correlation: Fifty fresh (12%) and 373 frozen (88%) samples were analyzed at two clinical laboratories and at DiaSorin. Patients from the disease states defined below and representing the eastern, midwestern and western United States were tested. The screening population is a group of samples from patients suspected of disease. The samples were chosen for each disease state population based upon comparison to expected patterns of serological testing results for the 4 EBV markers (EBV VCA IgG and IgM, EBNA, and EA), and for primary infection, heterophile test . For primary infection, the first level of inclusion/exclusion was based on IFA results for VCA IgM, VCA IgG and EBNA. Samples with positive results for the VCA antigen and negative results for the EBNA were included and further examined. The next level of inclusion/exclusion criteria was based upon the heterophile results. A positive result is expected for this test in acute EBV infection. Samples with positive VCA IgG, and heterophile test and negative EBNA result were included in the primary infection population. If a negative result was obtained on the heterophile test, the results of the EA IFA test were examined. A positive EA IFA resulted in inclusion of the sample. A negative EA IFA result resulted in exclusion of the sample.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Clinical Correlation: 50 fresh (12%) and 373 frozen (88%) samples. The components of the Copalis Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay were compared to expected marker patterns in defined disease states and separated into adult and pediatric populations. Equivocal results by Copalis or IFA or non-specific staining by IFA were not included in the calculations.
Primary Disease State Population - Adult:
- Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) for +VCA: 61/61 = 100.0% (94.1 - 100%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) for -EBNA: 56/59 = 94.9% (85.8 - 98.9%)
- Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) for +EA vs Heterophile/IFA: 56/59 = 94.9% (85.8 - 98.9%)
Primary Disease State Population - Pediatric: - Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) for +VCA: 12/12 = 100% (73.5 - 100.0%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) for -EBNA: 6/12 = 50.0% (21.1 - 78.9%)
- Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) for +EA vs Heterophile/IFA: 12/12 = 100.0% (73.5 - 100.0%)
Reactivated Disease State Population: - Relative Sensitivity for +VCA: 43/43 = 100.0% (91.8 - 100%)
- Relative Sensitivity for +EBNA: 35/39 = 89.7% (75.8 - 97.1%)
- Relative Sensitivity for +EA: 39/39 = 100.0% (91.0 - 100%)
EBV Screening Population - Adult: - Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) VCA: 26/27 = 96.8% (83.3 - 99.9%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) VCA: 2/2 = 100.0% (15.8 - 100.0%)
- Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) EBNA: 23/25 = 92.0% (74.0 - 99.0%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EBNA: 3/4 = 75.0% (19.4 - 99.4%)
- Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) EA: 15/18 = 83.3% (58.6 - 96.4%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EA: 7/9 = 77.8% (40.0 - 97.2%)
EBV Screening Population - Pediatric: - Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) VCA: 5/6 = 83.3% (35.9 - 99.6%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) VCA: 6/7 = 85.7% (42.1 - 99.6%)
- Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) EBNA: 6/6 = 100.0% (54.1 - 100.0%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EBNA: 7/7 = 100.0% (59.0 - 100.0%)
- Relative Sensitivity (95% CI) EA: 4/6 = 66.7% (22.3 - 95.7%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EA: 6/7 = 85.7% (42.1 - 99.6%)
Seronegative Population - Adult: - Relative Specificity (95% CI) VCA: 5/8 = 62.5% (24.5 - 91.5%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EBNA: 8/8 = 100.0% (63.1 - 100.0%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EA: 7/7 = 100% (59.0 - 100.0%)
Seronegative Population - Pediatric: - Relative Specificity (95% CI) VCA: 29/34 = 85.3% (68.9 - 95.0%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EBNA: 40/42 = 95.2% (83.8 - 99.4%)
- Relative Specificity (95% CI) EA: 34/39 = 87.2% (72.6 - 95.7%)
Apparently Healthy Population: - Relative Sensitivity VCA: 94/98 = 95.9% (89.9 - 98.9%)
- Relative Sensitivity EBNA: 95/102 = 93.1% (86.4 - 97.2%)
- Relative Sensitivity EA: 26/65 = 40.0% (28.0 - 52.9%)
- Relative Specificity EA: 25/31 = 80.6% (62.5 - 92.6%)
Transplant Recipients: - Relative Sensitivity VCA: 48/48 = 100% (92.6 – 100%)
- Relative Sensitivity EBNA: 35/40 = 87.5% (73.2 - 95.8%)
- Relative Specificity EBNA: 3/3 = 100.0% (29.2 – 100%)
- Relative Sensitivity EA: 44/44 = 100% (92.0 - 100%)
Transplant Donors: - Relative Sensitivity VCA: 50/50 = 100.0% (92.9 - 100%)
- Relative Sensitivity EBNA: 50/53 = 94.3% (84.3 - 98.8%)
- Relative Sensitivity EA: 20/43 = 46.5% (31.2 - 62.3%)
- Relative Specificity EA: 4/4 = 100.0% (39.8 - 100.0%)
Reproducibility: Reproducibility studies were performed at 3 sites using one lot of tests. Assay reproducibility was determined by testing 6 samples that spanned the range of the assay components CTRs. Samples were tested in duplicate once a day for 5 days.
Key results (VCA, EBNA, EA %CV for various samples):
- VCA: Neg Control 3.9%, Low Pos Control 12.3%, High Pos Control 21.8%, RP1 6.4%, RP2 6.1%, RP3 15.5%, RP4 18.7%, RP5 12.5%, RP6 7.3%, RP7 13.3%.
- EBNA: Neg Control 2.8%, Low Pos Control 7.3%, High Pos Control 14.5%, RP1 4.9%, RP2 4.2%, RP3 6.9%, RP4 13.0%, RP5 10.2%, RP6 18.0%, RP7 12.8%.
- EA: Neg Control 5.4%, Low Pos Control 8.7%, High Pos Control 19.5%, RP1 6.1%, RP2 5.9%, RP3 23.4%, RP4 22.3%, RP5 16.3%, RP6 12.4%, RP7 10.4%.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Relative Sensitivity, Relative Specificity, Agreement with IFA, Prevalence Copalis®, Prevalence IFA, Prevalence Heterophile, Prevalence Htphl/IFA, Within Run %CV, Total %CV.
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Not Found
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 866.3235 Epstein-Barr virus serological reagents.
(a)
Identification. Epstein-Barr virus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections and provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these viruses. Epstein-Barr viruses are thought to cause infectious mononucleosis and have been associated with Burkitt's lymphoma (a tumor of the jaw in African children and young adults) and postnasal carcinoma (cancer).(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls).
0
JUN 4 . . .
May 25, 1999
510(k) SUMMARY
SUBMITTED BY:
Judith J. Smith DiaSorin, Inc. 9175 Guilford Rd. Suite 100 Columbia, MD 21046
NAME OF DEVICES: Trade Name:
Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay
Common Names/Descriptions:
Immunoassay for the Detection of Total Antibodies to Epstein Barr Virus
Classification Names:
EBV Serology Test
Gull Laboratories EBV IgG IFA Gull Laboratories EBV-NA IFA Gull Laboratories EBV-EA IFA
DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
PREDICATE DEVICES:
INTENDED USE: The Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay uses Coupled Particle Light Scattering technology in a microparticle agglutination-based assay for the qualitative or semiquantitative detection of antibodies to EBV VCA (total antibodies), EBNA (IgG), and EA (IgG and IgM) antigens. The assay is designed for human serum using the Copalis® I Immunoassay System. The presence of VCA, EBNA and EA antibodies is used as an aid in the diagnosis of EBV associated mononucleosis when used in conjunction with other EBV serologies in pediatric, adult, transplant donor and transplant recipient populations. The disease state distinction is made based on the antibody pattern of reactivity. When evaluating properly paired sera, the results of these assays are used to demonstrate seroconversion or significant change in antibody titer as evidence of recent infection. Both specimens should be tested simultaneously.
KIT DESCRIPTION: Coupled Particle Light Scattering (Copalis®) technology provides a rapid method for the measurement of antibodies to specific pathogens. The Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay is a microparticle agglutination test using the Copalis® light scattering technology. Polystyrene microparticles of 3 sizes are coated with VCA synthetic peptide, EBNA recombinant antigen or EA recombinant antigen and are contained within a special covered reaction well in the test cup. The dried reagent is reconstituted with a reaction buffer on the instrument at the start of the assay. Patient sample is added to the reaction mixture and incubated for 10 minutes. The presence of antibodies specific to EBV antigens in the patient sample results in agglutination of the monomer microparticles to form aggregates. The reaction mixture is passed through a flow cell and the instrument uses light scattering technology to measure the monomer concentration. The decrease in the monomer population resulting from agglutination is related to the amount of antibody in the sample. The residual monomer concentration in each reaction mixture is compared to a cutoff value to determine sample reactivity and nonreactivity.
B-1
1
PERFORMANCE DATA:
Clinical Correlation: Fifty fresh (12%) and 373 frozen (88%) samples were analyzed at two clinical laboratories and at DiaSorin. Patients from the disease states defined below and representing the eastern, midwestern and western United States were tested. The screening population is a group of samples from patients suspected of disease. The samples were chosen for each disease state population based upon comparison to expected patterns of serological testing results for the 4 EBV markers (EBV VCA IgG and IgM, EBNA, and EA), and for primary infection, heterophile test . For primary infection, the first level of inclusion/exclusion was based on IFA results for VCA IgM, VCA IgG and EBNA. Samples with positive results for the VCA antigen and negative results for the EBNA were included and further examined. The next level of inclusion/exclusion criteria was based upon the heterophile results. A positive result is expected for this test in acute EBV infection. Samples with positive VCA IgG, and heterophile test and negative EBNA result were included in the primary infection population. If a negative result was obtained on the heterophile test, the results of the EA IFA test were examined. A positive EA IFA resulted in inclusion of the sample. A negative EA IFA result resulted in exclusion of the sample. A summary of the expected marker patterns for the EBV markers is summarized below.
| Antibody | Seronegat
ive | Primary | Reactivate
d | Past |
|--------------|------------------|---------|-----------------|------|
| IgM anti-VCA | - | + | - | - |
| IgG anti-VCA | - | + | + | + |
| Anti EBNA | - | - | + | -/+ |
| Anti-EA | - | + | + | + |
| Heterophile | - | + | N/A | N/A |
Summary of Expected Patterns for EBV Antigen Reactivity
The age of the primary disease population varied from 1 to 48 years of age (mean and median age: 22 years old). The age of the patients with reactivated disease varied from 3 to 68 (mean: 27, median 23). The age range of the seronegative group was 1 to 74 (mean: 14, median: 12). The components of the Copalis Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay were compared to expected marker patterns in the defined disease states and separated into adult and pediatric populations. The results of these studies are summarized below with the 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl). Equivocal results by Copalis or IFA or non-specific staining by IFA were not included in the calculations.
Primary Disease State Population - Adult
| Expected Pattern4
Copalis®/IFA | +
VCA | -
EBNAa | +
EA vs Heterophile/IFAb |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Relative Sensitivity
(95% CI) | 61/61 = 100.0%
(94.1 - 100%) | N/A | 56/59 = 94.9%
(85.8 - 98.9%) |
| Relative Specificity
(95% CI) | N/A | 56/59 = 94.9%
(85.8 - 98.9%) | N/A |
| Agreement with IFA | 61/61 = 100.0% | 56/59 = 94.9% | 56/59 = 94.9% |
| Prevalence Copalis® | 61/61 = 100.0% | 3/61 = 4.9% | 56/59 = 94.9% |
| Prevalence IFA | 61/61 = 100.0% | 0/59 = 0% | 13/54 = 24.1% |
| Prevalence Heterophile | N/A | N/A | 56/61 = 91.8% |
| Prevalence Htphl/IFA | N/A | N/A | 61/61 = 100% |
2 Copalis negative/IFA equivocal
02 Copalis equivocal/IFA positive
2
Primary Disease State Population - Pediatric
Expected Pattern4 | + | - | + |
---|---|---|---|
Copalis®/IFA | VCA | EBNA | EA vs Heterophile/IFA |
Relative Sensitivity | |||
(95% Cl) | 12/12 = 100% | ||
(73.5 - 100.0%) | N/A | 12/12 = 100.0% | |
(73.5 - 100.0%) | |||
Relative Specificity | |||
(95% Cl) | N/A | 6/12 = 50.0% | |
(21.1 - 78.9%) | N/A | ||
Agreement with IFA | 12/12 = 100.0% | 6/12 = 50.0% | 12/12 = 100.0% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 12/12 = 100.0% | 6/12 = 50.0% | 12/12 = 100.0% |
Prevalence IFA | 12/12 = 100.0% | 0/12 = 0% | 8/11c = 32.3% |
Prevalence Heterophile | N/A | N/A | 8/12 = 66.6% |
Prevalence Htphl/IFA | N/A | N/A | 12/12 = 100% |
61 Copalis + //FA equivocal
Reactivated Disease State Population
Expected Pattern | + | + | + |
---|---|---|---|
Copalis®/IFA | VCA | EBNAd | EAe |
Relative Sensitivity | 43/43 = 100.0% | 35/39 = 89.7% | 39/39 = 100.0% |
(95% CI) | (91.8 - 100%) | (75.8 - 97.1%) | (91.0 - 100%) |
Relative Specificity | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Agreement | 43/43 = 100.0% | 35/39 = 89.7% | 39/39 = 100.0% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 43/43 = 100.0% | 39/43 = 90.7% | 42/42 = 100% |
Prevalence IFA | 43/43 = 100.0% | 39/39 = 100% | 40/40 = 100% |
® 1 Copalis equivocal/IFA positive; 3 Copalis positive/IFA equivocal 0 4 Copalis positive/IFA equivocal
EBV Screening Population - Adult
Copalis®/IFA | VCA | EBNA | EAr |
---|---|---|---|
Relative Sensitivity | $26/27 = 96.8%$ | $23/25 = 92.0%$ | $15/18 = 83.3%$ |
(95% CI) | (83.3 - 99.9%) | (74.0 - 99.0%) | (58.6 - 96.4%) |
Relative Specificity | $2/2 = 100.0%$ | $3/4 = 75.0%$ | $7/9=77.8%$ |
(95% CI) | (15.8 - 100.0%) | (19.4 - 99.4%) | (40.0 - 97.2%) |
Agreement with IFA | $28/29 = 96.6%$ | $26/29 = 89.7$ | $22/27 = 81.5%$ |
Prevalence Copalis® | $26/29 = 89.7%$ | $24/29 = 82.9%$ | $17/29 = 58.6%$ |
Prevalence IFA | $27/29 = 93.1%$ | $25/29 = 86.2%$ | $18/29 = 62.1%$ |
1 Copalis equivocal/IFA positive; 1 Copalis equivocal/IFA negative
EBV Screening Population - Pediatric
Copalis®/IFA | VCA | EBNA | EA |
---|---|---|---|
Relative Sensitivity | 5/6 = 83.3% | 6/6 = 100.0% | 4/6 = 66.7% |
(95% CI) | (35.9 - 99.6%) | (54.1 - 100.0%) | (22.3 - 95.7%) |
Relative Specificity | 6/7 = 85.7% | 7/7 = 100.0% | 6/7 = 85.7% |
(95% CI) | (42.1 - 99.6%) | (59.0 - 100.0%) | (42.1 - 99.6%) |
Agreement with IFA | 11/13 = 84.6% | 13/13 = 100.0% | 10/13 = 76.9% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 6/13 = 46.2% | 6/13 = 46.2% | 5/13 = 38.5% |
Prevalence IFA | 6/13 = 46.2% | 6/13 = 46.2% | 6/13 = 46.2% |
3
Seronegative Population - Adult
Expected Pattern | - | - | - |
---|---|---|---|
Copalis®/IFA | VCA | EBNA | EA9 |
Relative Sensitivity | |||
(95% CI) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Relative Specificity | |||
(95% CI) | 5/8 = 62.5% | ||
(24.5 - 91.5%) | 8/8 = 100.0% | ||
(63.1 - 100.0%) | 7/7 = 100% | ||
(59.0 - 100.0%) | |||
Agreement | 5/8 = 62.5% | 8/8 = 100.0% | 7/7 = 100.0% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 3/8 = 37.5% | 0/8 = 0% | 0/7 = 0% |
Prevalence IFA | 0/8 = 0% | 0/8 = 0% | 0/7 = 0% |
9 1 Copalis negative/IFA non-specific staining
Seronegative Population - Pediatric
Expected Pattern | - | - | - |
---|---|---|---|
Copalis®/IFA | VCA" | EBNA | EA' |
Relative Sensitivity | |||
(95% CI) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Relative Specificity | |||
(95% CI) | 29/34 = 85.3% | ||
(68.9 - 95.0%) | 40/42 = 95.2% | ||
(83.8 - 99.4%) | 34/39 = 87.2% | ||
(72.6 - 95.7%) | |||
Agreement | 29/34 = 85.3% | 40/42 = 95.2% | 34/39 = 87.2% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 5/36 = 13.9% | 2/42 = 4.8% | 5/39 = 12.8% |
Prevalence IFA | 0/40 = 0% | 0/42 = 0% | 0/42 = 0% |
11 6 Copalis equivocal/IFA negative; 2 Copalis negative/IFA equivocal
¹ 3 Copalis equivocal/IFA negative
Apparently Healthy Population
Copalis®/IFA | VCAj | EBNA | EAk |
---|---|---|---|
Relative Sensitivity | 94/98 = 95.9% | 95/102 = 93.1% | 26/65 = 40.0% |
(95% CI) | (89.9 - 98.9%) | (86.4 - 97.2%) | (28.0 - 52.9%) |
Relative Specificity | N/A | N/A | 25/31 = 80.6% |
(95% CI) | (62.5 - 92.6%) | ||
Agreement with IFA | 94/98 = 95.9% | 95/102 = 93.1% | 51/96 = 53.1% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 94/98 = 95.9% | 95/102 = 93.1% | 33/98 = 33.7% |
Prevalence IFA | 102/102 = 100% | 102/102 = 100% | 69/100 = 69% |
4 Copalis equivocal/IFA positive
- 4 Copalis equivocal/IFA positive/IFA equivocal; 1 Copalis negative/IFA equivocal
Transplant Recipients
Copalis®/IFA | VCA | EBNAl | EAm |
---|---|---|---|
Relative Sensitivity | 48/48 = 100% | 35/40 = 87.5% | 44/44 = 100% |
(95% CI) | (92.6 – 100%) | (73.2 - 95.8%) | (92.0 - 100%) |
Relative Specificity | N/A | 3/3 = 100.0% | N/A |
(95% CI) | (29.2 – 100%) | ||
Agreement with IFA | 48/48 = 100.0% | 38/43 = 88.4% | 45/44 = 100% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 48/48 = 100% | 40/48 = 83.3% | 47/48 = 97.9% |
Prevalence IFA | 48/48 = 100% | 40/48 = 83.3% | 45/48 = 93.8 |
5 Copalis positive/IFA equivocal
™ 1 Copalis equivocal/IFA positive; 3 Copalis positive/IFA nss
4
Transplant Donors
Copalis®/IFA | VCAn | EBNA | EAo |
---|---|---|---|
Relative Sensitivity | |||
(95% CI) | 50/50 = 100.0% | ||
(92.9 - 100%) | 50/53 = 94.3% | ||
(84.3 - 98.8%) | 20/43 = 46.5% | ||
(31.2 - 62.3%) | |||
Relative Specificity | |||
(95% CI) | N/A | N/A | 4/4 = 100.0% |
(39.8 - 100.0%) | |||
Agreement with IFA | 50/50 = 100.0% | 50/50 = 94.3% | 24/47 = 51.1% |
Prevalence Copalis® | 50/53 = 94.3% | 50/50 = 94.3% | 21/53 = 39.6% |
Prevalence IFA | 53/53 = 100.0% | 53/53 = 100.0% | 47/51 = 92.9% |
3 Copalis positive/IFA equivocal
º 4 Copalis equivocal/IFA positive; 1 Copalis positive/ IFA nss; 1 Copalis negative/IFA nss
When viewed as a panel of results, the Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay gives equivalent performance to IFA. Prevalence by Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay components in the defined disease states more closely matches expected prevalences than IFA. This is especially noticeable with EA IFA which shows poor correlation to disease state or heterophile result. The EA IFA prevalence in the primary infection population was lower than expected and in the apparently healthy population was higher than expected. The same pattern was seen in the recipient/donor population study. The poor agreement between the EA component of the Copalis® assay and EA IFA is also due to the EA IFA results that do not correlate to clinical state. Copalis® Multiplex EBV EA component detects EA(D) whereas EA IFA detects both EA(D) and EA(R). This could account for the large number of apparently false positive EA IFA results since EA(D) is present only in primary infection and EA(R) is present long after recovery. Regarding EBNA comparison, it has been reported that recombinant EBNA assays are more sensitive to EBNA IgG than IFA.
Reproducibility: Reproducibility studies were performed at the 3 sites using one lot of tests. Assay reproducibility was determined by testing 6 samples that spanned the range of the assay components CTRs. Samples were tested in duplicate once a day for 5 days. The results are summarized below.
| Sample | Mean
CI | Within Run
%CV | Total
%CV |
|------------------|------------|-------------------|--------------|
| Neg Control | 0.78 | -- | 3.9% |
| Low Pos Control | 2.17 | -- | 12.3% |
| High Pos Control | 11.23 | -- | 21.8% |
| RP 1 | 0.81 | 1.9% | 6.4% |
| RP 2 | 0.81 | 2.0% | 6.1% |
| RP 3 | 13.78 | 7.3% | 15.5% |
| RP 4 | 34.89 | 18.5% | 18.7% |
| RP 5 | 5.39 | 8.6% | 12.5% |
| RP 6 | 1.05 | 2.8% | 7.3% |
| RP 7 | 1.35 | 7.6% | 13.3% |
Reproducibility Results, Combined Sites ~ VCA
5
Reproducibility Results, Combined – EBNA
| Sample | Mean | Within Run
%CV | Total |
|------------------|-------|-------------------|-------|
| | CI | | %CV |
| Neg Control | 0.82 | -- | 2.8% |
| Low Pos Control | 1.80 | -- | 7.3% |
| High Pos Control | 8.95 | -- | 14.5% |
| RP 1 | 0.84 | 3.1% | 4.9% |
| RP 2 | 0.85 | 2.6% | 4.2% |
| RP 3 | 0.92 | 2.6% | 6.9% |
| RP 4 | 31.36 | 13.9% | 13.0% |
| RP 5 | 2.10 | 8.2% | 10.2% |
| RP 6 | 60.20 | 13.8% | 18.0% |
| RP 7 | 2.65 | 9.7% | 12.8% |
Reproducibility Results, Combined --EA
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ults, Combined -EA | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sample | Mean | ||
CI | Within Run | ||
%CV | Total | ||
%CV | |||
Neg Control | 0.84 | -- | 5.4% |
Low Pos Control | 1.83 | -- | 8.7% |
High Pos Control | 7.37 | -- | 19.5% |
RP 1 | 0.86 | 1.9% | 6.1% |
RP 2 | 0.87 | 0.8% | 5.9% |
RP 3 | 16.68 | 9.1% | 23.4% |
RP 4 | 2.18 | 8.6% | 22.3% |
RP 5 | 5.50 | 9.0% | 16.3% |
RP 6 | 0.99 | 4.0% | 12.4% |
RP 7 | 0.96 | 4.7% | 10.4% |
6
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with a serpent entwined around it. The caduceus is positioned to the right of the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA", which is arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol. The logo is black and white.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
4 1999 JUN
DiaSorin, Inc. c/o Carole Stamp TUV Product Service. Inc. 1775 Old Highway 8 NW New Brighton, MN 55112
Re: K991660
Trade Name: Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay Regulatory Class: I Product Code: LSE Dated: May 27, 1999 Received: May 28, 1999
Dear Ms. Stamp:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
7
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Sutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
8
INDICATIONS FOR USE
510(k) Number (if known): not known
Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay Device Name: Indications For Use: The Copalis® Multiplex EBV Antibody Assay uses Coupled Particle Light Scattering technology in a micropaticle agglutination-based assay for the qualitative or semiquantitative detection of antibodies to EBV VCA (total antibodies), EBNA (IgG), and EA (IgG and IgM) antigens. The assay is designed for human serum using the Copalis® I Immunoassay System. The presence of VCA, EBNA and EA antibodies is used as an aid in the diagnosis of EBV associated mononucleosis when used in conjunction with other EBV serologies in pediatric, adult, transplant donor and transplant recipient populations. The disease state distinction is made based on the antibody pattern of reactivity. When evaluating properly paired sera, the results of these assays are used to demonstrate seroconversion or significant change in antibody titer as evidence of recent infection. Both specimens should be tested simultaneously.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Woody Dubois
n of Clinical Laboratory Dev 510(k) Number
Prescription Use X
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)