(28 days)
Elan ALP Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of alkalinc phosphatasc in serum and plasma for the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases.
This reagent is intended to be used on a Beckman® SYNCHRON CX ® autoanalyzer in a professional setting or by trained personnel, and is not intended for home use.
Elan ALP Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of alkaline phosphatasc in serum and plasma nd plant of the same of any the wide with and interlinal diverder Flan ALP Reagent is intended for the qualificantes news.id, and intestinal disorders.
The Elan ALP Reagent determines alkaline phosphatase by catalyzing the hydrolysis of p-nitrohenythosphate to The Elan ALP Reagent determines alkaline phosphalase of catalyzhig in 1970 - 1991 - 1991
p-nitrophenol. The resulting increase in absorbance at approximately 410 nm is propo phosphatase activity in the sample.
The Elan AIJP Reagent is an adaptation of the AACC and IFCC methods, and is intended for use with the Beckman The Elan ALP Reagent is an adaptation of the AACC and ICC negired manipulations To support this Synchron CX-5 Autoanalyzer, or with analyzers willen ear attemate at other of those instruments.
Iatter use, procedure supplication sheets) will be supplied to the users of t
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance
The Elan ALP Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of alkaline phosphatase. The reported device performance is compared to the Beckman® SYNCHRON® Systems ALP Reagent.
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Linearity Range | Recoveries of alkaline phosphatase show a linearity range from 5 U/L to 1000 U/L. Regression equation: (Elan Recoveries) = 2.788 U/L + 0.990 x (Standard Factors), r² = 1.000, Sys = 1.148, df = 10. (Standard factors ranging from 0 to 1251 U/L) |
| Precision (within-run SD and total SD) | Low Specimen (37.5 U/L): within-run SD = 1.34, total SD = 1.36 Medium Specimen (251.4 U/L): within-run SD = 1.38, total SD = 3.70 High Specimen (740.6 U/L): within-run SD = 4.13, total SD = 15.38 |
| Method Comparison (Patient Samples) | Serum and Plasma Specimens: (Elan Results) = - 0.451 U/L + 0.9986 x (Beckman® Results), r² = 0.9964, S(x) = 3.059. |
| Interference (Anticoagulants) | The addition of anticoagulants (heparin and lithium iodoacetate) resulted in changes of less than 1.5 U/L alkaline phosphatase, and this was statistically insignificant. This indicates acceptable performance in the presence of these additives. |
| Detection Limit | Claimed: 5 U/L Observed: 1.845 U/L (calculated as three standard deviations of a 30 replicate within-run precision study). This is below the claimed limit. |
| On-board Reagent Stability | 10 days on-board stability. Changes in alkaline phosphatase recoveries over the test periods were less than 3 U/L or 6%. |
Study Details
-
Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Linearity/Precision:
- Precision: 60 replicates for each of the low, medium, and high control specimens.
- Linearity: Not explicitly stated as a separate sample size for a "test set" but implied by the recovery of linearity standards.
- Method Comparison: 80 serum specimens and 78 plasma specimens (total 158 specimens).
- Detection Limit: 30 replicate assays of an alkaline phosphatase standard.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated (e.g., country of origin). The studies appear to be retrospective as they are described as evaluations of the reagent's performance.
- Linearity/Precision:
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- This is a diagnostic reagent for quantitative measurement. The "ground truth" is established by the performance of the predicate device (Beckman® SYNCHRON® Systems ALP Reagent) and established laboratory reference methods/standards. No human experts are directly used to establish "ground truth" for individual cases in this context.
-
Adjudication method for the test set:
- Not applicable. This is a quantitative assay comparison against a predicate device and established analytical performance specifications. No adjudication method involving multiple readers/experts for case interpretation is mentioned or relevant.
-
If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable. This is a submission for a diagnostic reagent, not an AI or imaging device that involves human interpretation.
-
If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. This is a laboratory reagent. The performance described is inherently "standalone" in the sense that it refers to the reagent's analytical performance on an autoanalyzer, without direct human cognitive interpretation of results as a primary outcome.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- For Linearity and Precision: Established laboratory standards and commercially available control sera with known concentrations.
- For Method Comparison: The results obtained from the predicate device (Beckman® SYNCHRON® Systems ALP Reagent) on the same specimens.
- For Detection Limit: An alkaline phosphatase standard.
- For Anticoagulant Interference: Spiked and unspiked serum pools.
- For On-board Stability: Serum controls.
-
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable for a reagent submission. There is no "training set" in the context of machine learning. The "development" or "optimization" of the reagent would involve calibrants and controls, but these are not referred to as a "training set."
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable, as there is no "training set" in the machine learning sense. The methodological basis for the Elan ALP Reagent is an adaptation of the AACC and IFCC methods, which are widely accepted and standardized chemical assays.
{0}------------------------------------------------
34
MAY 1 9 1000
élan diagnostics
Image /page/0/Picture/3 description: The image shows a logo for "élan". The logo consists of a stylized letter "e" formed by multiple parallel lines curving around to create a circular shape. To the left of the "e", there are three horizontal lines extending outward, suggesting movement or direction. Below the symbol, the word "élan" is written in a lowercase sans-serif font.
SUMMARY OF 510(K) SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS INFORMATION
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 21 CFR 807.92.
Elan ALP Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of alkaline phosphatasc in serum and plasma
nd plant of the same of any the wide with and interlinal diverder Flan ALP Reagent is intended for the qualificantes news.id, and intestinal disorders.
The Elan ALP Reagent determines alkaline phosphatase by catalyzing the hydrolysis of p-nitrohenythosphate to The Elan ALP Reagent determines alkaline phosphalase of catalyzhig in 1970 - 1991 - 1991
p-nitrophenol. The resulting increase in absorbance at approximately 410 nm is propo phosphatase activity in the sample.
The Elan AIJP Reagent is an adaptation of the AACC and IFCC methods, and is intended for use with the Beckman The Elan ALP Reagent is an adaptation of the AACC and ICC negired manipulations To support this Synchron CX-5 Autoanalyzer, or with analyzers willen ear attemate at other of those instruments.
Iatter use, procedure supplication sheets) will be supplied to the users of t
The Elan ALP Reagent is substantially equivalent to the Beckman® SYNCHRON® Systems ALP Reagent, production The Elan ALP Reagent is substantially equivalent to the Deckner of teenters of based on the same methodology
no. 442670, manufactured by Beckman Instruments, Brea, CA. Doth c no. 442670, manufactured by the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenylphosphate to p-nitrophenol.
The effectiveness of the Elan reagent application for the Beckman" Systems is shown by the The effectiveness of the Elan reagent application of crecovery of ferum controls for on-board
recovery of linearity standards, the precision of control recovery of ferum cont recovery of linearity standards, the precision of control recovery of the records of patient speciments stability claims, the Vandation of chemical was and of Reagent.
The recoveries of alkaline phosphatase using the Elan ALP Reagon on the SYNCHRON CXX ° Systems are linearity range. Regression The recoveries of alkaline phosphatase using ne read which span the linearity range. Regression
from 5 U/L to 1000 U/L as shown by the recovery of linearity stant tartars wh from 5 U/L to 1000 U/L as shown by the recovery of mich is now and standard factors which range from 0 to 1251 U/L, are shown below.
(Elan Recoveries) = 2.788 U/L + 0.990 x (Standard Factors), r2 = 1.000 Sys = 1.148, df = 10
Precision, demonstrated by replicate assays of commercially available control sera and a spiked high control is shown below.
| Specimen | n | mean | within-run SD | total SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | 60 | 37.5 U/L | 1.34 | 1.36 |
| medium | 60 | 251.4 U/L | 1.38 | 3.70 |
| high | 60 | 740.6 U/L | 4.13 | 15.38 |
510(k) Notification, Elan Alkaline Phosphatase Reagent Kit Elan Diagnostics, Brea, California
{1}------------------------------------------------
élan diagnostics
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows a logo for "élan". The logo features a stylized letter "e" formed by multiple curved lines, with three horizontal lines extending from the left side of the "e". Below the symbol is the word "élan" in a sans-serif font, with an acute accent over the "e". The logo is black and white.
Alkaline phosphatase recoveries of 80 serum specimens and 78 plasma specimens are compared between the Elan and Beckman® AP Reagents on the SYNCHRON CX® Systems. Least squared regression statistics are shown below.
Patients Comparisons: (Elan Results) = - 0.451 U/L + 0.9986 x (Beckman® Results) r2 = 0.9964 = S(x) = 3.059 n = 158
The use of anticoagulants, heparin and lithium iodoacetate are shown to be acceptable chemical additives by comparison of spiked and unspiked serum pools. In all cases, the addition of anticonnulants is less than 1.5 U/I . alkaline phosphatase and statistically insignificant.
The detection limit claim of 5 U/L is documented through the repetitive assay of an alkaline phosphatase standard. The observed detection limit, calculated as three standard deviations of a 30 replicate within ruroprieision study is 1.845 U/I. and is below the claimed limit.
The 10 day on-board reagent stability claim is documented through the assay of serum controls over the claimed periods. In all cases, the changes in alkaline phosphatasc recoveries over the test periods are less than 3 VL 6 6 %
Ralph Belotti
510(k) Notification, Flan Alkaline Phosphatase Reagent Kit Elan Diagnostics, Brea, California
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image is a seal for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The seal is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is a stylized image of an eagle.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
MAY 1 9 1990
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Ralph Bolstad Senior R & D Chemist Elan Diagnostics 231 North Puente Street Brea, California 92821
Rc: K991387
Trade Name: Elan Alkalinc Phosphate Reagent Kit Regulatory Class: II Product Code: CJE Dated: April 19, 1999 Reccived: April 21, 1999
Dear Mr. Bolstad:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against
misbranding and adulteration misbranding and adultcration.
If your device is classified (sec above) into cither class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (OS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic Q1 inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Tailure (o comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may
1988 (Clinical Laborators areassizetion - To determine if it does, you should c Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendiments of 1 706 (OEIF 2017)
require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the first require a CLIA complexity categorization: 16 accential
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
Chiels in Lisease obla This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device to a legally harketed on Algally marketed
notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device t notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
proceded on the for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (2) Office of Compliance at
additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the If you desire open in vite dagnostic devices), please contact me of your device,
(301) 594-4588. Al or in xitte diagnostic devices), please not the regulation (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and at were and (101) 594-4368. Premience at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note more in estable in estable in elemental
entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket mor be obtained fro pressed on the mail on reference to premarket motification (1) CLFK of From the Division of Small
entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarked from the Division of Small entitude, Tresponsibilities under the Act may be oblamber (801) 443-6597, or at its
Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at Manufacturers Assistance at its ton-free hands in ("." ")
internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrlv/dsmaldsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Putman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D, M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known):
Page 1 of 1
Device Name: Elan ALP Reagent Kit
Indications For Use:
Elan ALP Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of alkalinc phosphatasc in serum and plasma for the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases.
This reagent is intended to be used on a Beckman® SYNCHRON CX ® autoanalyzer in a professional setting or by trained personnel, and is not intended for home use.
Respectively,
Ralph Bolstad Senior R&D Chemist Elan Diagnostics
19 April, 1999
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K991387
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices 510(k) Number
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109) ✓
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
§ 862.1050 Alkaline phosphatase or isoenzymes test system.
(a)
Identification. An alkaline phosphatase or isoenzymes test system is a device intended to measure alkaline phosphatase or its isoenzymes (a group of enzymes with similar biological activity) in serum or plasma. Measurements of alkaline phosphatase or its isoenzymes are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases.(b)
Classification. Class II.