K Number
K990059
Date Cleared
1999-01-28

(20 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3070
Panel
OR
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

As a posterior, non-pedicle screw system of the T4-S2 spine, the Osteonics® Spinal System is indicated for:

  • Long and short curve scoliosis .
  • Vertebral fracture or dislocation
  • . Spondylolisthesis
  • . Degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies).
  • Previously failed fusion
  • . Spinal tumor

Pedicular Use:

  • When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the non-cervical posterior spine in skeletally . mature patients, the Osteonics Spinal System is indicated for one or more of the following: degenerative spondylolistlisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).
  • In addition, the Osteonics Spinal system is indicated for pedicle screw fixation in skeletally . mature patients with severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the L5-S1 joint, having fusions with autogenous bone graft, having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (with pedicle placement at L3 and below)with removal of the implants after the development of a solid fusion mass.
Device Description

The Osteonics® Spinal System is comprised of single-use, non-sterile devices manufactured from ASTM F-136-96 Titanium Alloy (Ti6Al-4V ELI). The Osteonics® Spinal System consists of rods, hooks, containment rings, bone screws and their accessories (blockers and caps), and transverse links.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for the Osteonics® Spinal System. It seeks expanded indications for use, particularly concerning pedicle screw applications, due to a recent reclassification of such uses.

However, the document does not contain information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, or how ground truth was established, which are typically found in clinical trial reports or validation studies.

This document is primarily a regulatory submission for expanding the indications of an already cleared device, asserting substantial equivalence to the previously cleared version of the same device. It focuses on the scope of use rather than proving specific performance metrics through new studies.

Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table or provide details about the study because the provided text does not contain that information. The document explicitly states:

  • "The Osteonics® Spinal System functions as the subject and predicate device. The components of the Osteonics® Spinal System were determined to be substantially equivalent via 510(k) #K951725."
  • "The design and function of the Osteonics® Spinal System remains unchanged."
  • "As a result of the recent downclassification of pedicle screw uses, the indications of the Osteonics® Spinal System will be expanded..."

These statements indicate that the submission is based on regulatory reclassification and previous substantial equivalence determinations, not on new performance studies for the expanded indications.

§ 888.3070 Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system.

(a)
Identification. (1) Rigid pedicle screw systems are comprised of multiple components, made from a variety of materials that allow the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of screws, longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, and interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors).(2) Semi-rigid systems are defined as systems that contain one or more of the following features (including but not limited to): Non-uniform longitudinal elements, or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.
(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls), when intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra; degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). These pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:(i) Compliance with material standards;
(ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standards;
(iii) Compliance with biocompatibility standards; and
(iv) Labeling that contains these two statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information:
“Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown.”
“Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient.”
(2) Class II (special controls), when a rigid pedicle screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis other than either severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 or degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment. These pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(ii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(iii) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(v) Labeling must include the following:
(A) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(B) Intended use and indications for use, including levels of fixation;
(C) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(D) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user; and
(E) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
(3) Class II (special controls), when a semi-rigid system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion for any indication. In addition to complying with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this section, these pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) Demonstration that clinical performance characteristics of the device support the intended use of the product, including assessment of fusion compared to a clinically acceptable fusion rate.
(ii) Semi-rigid systems marketed prior to the effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating compliance with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) and paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section.