(84 days)
The ENDOPATH® Ultra-Retractor and Vessel Dissector are intended for use in dissecting and retracting in all types of surgical procedures requiring dissection and retraction of tissue.
The ENDOPATH™ Ultra-Retractor has application for the creation and maintenance of an operative cavity in the extraperitoneal spaces such as the retroperitoneal, preperitoneal, and subcutaneous areas. The device may be used in all types of surgical procedures, requiring dissection and retraction of tissue.
The Vessel Dissector has application for use in the blunt dissection of tubular structures such as veins, arteries, nerves, and ducts. The device may also be used in all types of surgical procedures requiring dissection of tissue.
The ENDOPATH® Ultra-Retractor consists of a handle, a wide shaft, and a transparent blunt tip dissector (two instruments are available with a variation in the tip size). The blunt tip dissects tissue and creates a cavity that allows instrument passage. The wide shaft maintains the space created by the transparent tip. The tip is transparent to allow visualization during insertion, tunneling, and dissection. Also, the device is provided with a luer lock, located on the handle, for the attachment of suction or gas, such as CO2, nitrogen, or air, as an aid for the removal of mist or smoke when used in combination with electrosurgery or ultrasonic devices and/or clearing the endoscope lens.
The instrument is compatible with a rigid endoscope that has maximum diameter of 5.5mm and is 290mm to 300mm in length.
This document is a 510(k) summary for the ENDOPATH® Ultra-Retractor and Vessel Dissector. It does not contain the level of detail typically found in a study description that would allow for a comprehensive answer to all parts of your request. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing detailed outcomes from a large-scale clinical study with specific performance metrics and ground truth establishment.
Here's what can be extracted and what cannot:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Device can be used as designed and is safe and effective. | "Pre-clinical laboratory evaluations were performed to ensure that the device can be used as designed. The studies demonstrated acceptable performance to the Predicate Device." |
| Substantial equivalence to predicate device. | "Based on the 510(k) summaries and 510(k) statements (21 CFR §807) and the information provided herein, we conclude that the New Device is substantially equivalent to the Predicate Device under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act." |
| Compatibility with rigid endoscope | "The instrument is compatible with a rigid endoscope that has maximum diameter of 5.5mm and is 290mm to 300mm in length." |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Sample Size: Not specified. The document only mentions "Pre-clinical laboratory evaluations." These are likely benchtop tests or potentially animal studies, not human clinical trials with a defined test set sample size.
- Data Provenance: Not specified. Given it's pre-clinical lab evaluation, it would likely be internal testing data, not country-specific patient data.
- Retrospective/Prospective: Not specified, but "Pre-clinical laboratory evaluations" often imply prospective testing designed to evaluate specific aspects of the device.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
- This information is not provided. Pre-clinical evaluations typically rely on engineering specifications, design verification, and internal expert judgment regarding mechanical and functional performance, rather than a formal "ground truth" established by external medical experts in the way clinical studies do.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
- Not applicable/not specified. Adjudication methods are typically used in clinical studies where interpretation of results (e.g., image readings) by multiple human experts is involved. Pre-clinical lab evaluations generally do not involve this process.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This document predates widespread AI in medical devices and focuses on mechanical and functional equivalence for a surgical instrument. An MRMC study is relevant for diagnostic imaging AI algorithms, not for surgical retractors.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- No, this is not an AI/algorithm-based device. It is a physical surgical instrument. Therefore, a standalone algorithm performance study is not applicable.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
- The document refers to "pre-clinical laboratory evaluations." For a surgical instrument like this, the "ground truth" would likely be adherence to engineering specifications, successful performance of intended functions (e.g., retraction strength, dissection ability, ability to maintain space), material compatibility, and sterile barrier integrity. This would be verified through a combination of physical and mechanical testing, not expert consensus on medical images or pathology.
8. The sample size for the training set
- Not applicable. This device does not use a training set as it is not an AI/machine learning device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Not applicable, as there is no training set for this device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a black and white logo. The logo consists of a circle with a series of lines emanating from the lower left towards the upper right. The lines appear to be converging, creating a sense of movement or direction within the circular shape.
4545 CREEK ROAD
CINCINNATI, OH 45242-2839
Nov 1 3 1997
510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Information supporting claims of substantial equivalence, as defined under the Statement Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, respecting safety and effectiveness is summarized below. For the convenience of the Reviewer, this summary is formatted in accordance with the Agency's final rule "…510(k) Summaries and 510(k) Statements..." (21 CFR §807) and can be used to provide a substantial equivalence summary to anyone requesting it from the Agency.
The ENDOPATH® Ultra-Retractor consists of a handle, a wide shaft, and a Device transparent blunt tip dissector (two instruments are available with a variation description in the tip size). The blunt tip dissects tissue and creates a cavity that allows instrument passage. The wide shaft maintains the space created by the transparent tip. The tip is transparent to allow visualization during insertion, tunneling, and dissection. Also, the device is provided with a luer lock, located on the handle, for the attachment of suction or gas, such as CO2, nitrogen, or air, as an aid for the removal of mist or smoke when used in combination with electrosurgery or ultrasonic devices and/or clearing the endoscope lens.
The instrument is compatible with a rigid endoscope that has maximum diameter of 5.5mm and is 290mm to 300mm in length.
The ENDOPATH® Ultra-Retractor and Vessel Dissector are intended for use Intended use in dissecting and retracting in all types of surgical procedures requiring dissection and retraction of tissue.
Continued on next page
$\text{Ceu}$
$\text{II}$
{1}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, Continued
| Indicationsstatement | The ENDOPATH™ Ultra-Retractor has application for the creation andmaintenance of an operative cavity in the extraperitoneal spaces such as theretroperitoneal, preperitoneal, and subcutaneous areas. The device may beused in all types of surgical procedures, requiring dissection and retraction oftissue. |
|---|---|
| The Vessel Dissector has application for use in the blunt dissection of tubularstructures such as veins, arteries, nerves, and ducts. The device may also beused in all types of surgical procedures requiring dissection of tissue. | |
| Technologicalcharacteristics | The technological characteristics of the New Device are the same as thePredicate Device. |
| Performancedata | Pre-clinical laboratory evaluations were performed to ensure that the devicecan be used as designed. The studies demonstrated acceptable performance tothe Predicate Device. |
| Conclusion | Based on the 510(k) summaries and 510(k) statements (21 CFR §807) andthe information provided herein, we conclude that the New Device issubstantially equivalent to the Predicate Device under the Federal Food,Drug and Cosmetic Act. |
| Contact | Lonnie PaceProject ManagerRegulatory Affairs DepartmentEthicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.4545 Creek RoadCincinnati, Ohio 45242 |
| Date | August 18, 1997 |
:
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo features a stylized eagle with three heads facing to the right. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
NOV 1 3 1997
Mr. Lonnie Pace Project Manager, Regulatory Affairs Department Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. 4545 Creek Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45242
Re: K973139
Trade Name: Endopath® Ultra-Retractor and Endopath® Vessel Dissector Regulatory Class: II Product Code: GCJ Dated: August 18, 1997 Received: August 21, 1997
Dear Mr. Pace:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the devices referenced above and we have determined the devices are substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the devices, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your devices are classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), they may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your devices can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements , as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your devices in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submissions does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Lonnie Pace
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your devices as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your devices to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your devices and thus, permits your devices to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your devices on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4595. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your devices, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Sincerely yours,
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use Statement Appendix B
Following is the Indications for Use Statement: Statement
510(k) Number: K973139 Device Name:
Indications for Use:
The ENDOPATH® Ultra-Retractor has application for the creation and maintenance of an operative cavity in the extraperitoneal spaces such as the retroperitoneal, preperitoneal and subcutaneous areas. The device may be used in all types of surgical procedures requiring dissection and retraction of tissue.
The Vessel Dissector has application for use in the blunt dissection of tubular structures such as veins, arteries, nerves and ducts. The device may also be used in all types of surgical procedures requiring dissection of tissue.
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Division Sign Off
on Sian-Off Division of General Restorative Device 510(k) Number
§ 876.1500 Endoscope and accessories.
(a)
Identification. An endoscope and accessories is a device used to provide access, illumination, and allow observation or manipulation of body cavities, hollow organs, and canals. The device consists of various rigid or flexible instruments that are inserted into body spaces and may include an optical system for conveying an image to the user's eye and their accessories may assist in gaining access or increase the versatility and augment the capabilities of the devices. Examples of devices that are within this generic type of device include cleaning accessories for endoscopes, photographic accessories for endoscopes, nonpowered anoscopes, binolcular attachments for endoscopes, pocket battery boxes, flexible or rigid choledochoscopes, colonoscopes, diagnostic cystoscopes, cystourethroscopes, enteroscopes, esophagogastroduodenoscopes, rigid esophagoscopes, fiberoptic illuminators for endoscopes, incandescent endoscope lamps, biliary pancreatoscopes, proctoscopes, resectoscopes, nephroscopes, sigmoidoscopes, ureteroscopes, urethroscopes, endomagnetic retrievers, cytology brushes for endoscopes, and lubricating jelly for transurethral surgical instruments. This section does not apply to endoscopes that have specialized uses in other medical specialty areas and that are covered by classification regulations in other parts of the device classification regulations.(b)
Classification —(1)Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an endoscope disinfectant basin, which consists solely of a container that holds disinfectant and endoscopes and accessories; an endoscopic magnetic retriever intended for single use; sterile scissors for cystoscope intended for single use; a disposable, non-powered endoscopic grasping/cutting instrument intended for single use; a diagnostic incandescent light source; a fiberoptic photographic light source; a routine fiberoptic light source; an endoscopic sponge carrier; a xenon arc endoscope light source; an endoscope transformer; an LED light source; or a gastroenterology-urology endoscopic guidewire, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I for the photographic accessories for endoscope, miscellaneous bulb adapter for endoscope, binocular attachment for endoscope, eyepiece attachment for prescription lens, teaching attachment, inflation bulb, measuring device for panendoscope, photographic equipment for physiologic function monitor, special lens instrument for endoscope, smoke removal tube, rechargeable battery box, pocket battery box, bite block for endoscope, and cleaning brush for endoscope. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 876.9.