K Number
K961020
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
1996-06-05

(85 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.3640
Panel
DE
Reference & Predicate Devices
N/A
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The implant is indicated for use in restoring masticatory function in the edentulous and/or partially edentulous patient.

Device Description

The Steri-Oss implant is designed to serve as support for prosthetic devices to restore patient chewing function. Natural dentition is composed of a root (subgingival) and a crown (supragingival). Designs in existence are intended to mimic this structure to aid the patient in restoring natural masticatory function. The implant is designed to serve as the root of the artificial tooth and the abutment/prosthetic is designed to serve as the crown. The implants are 6 mm in diameter, from 8 -They are 18 mm in length and are composed of titanium. available with a flat or hex lock superior surface, and are either cylindrical or threaded.

AI/ML Overview

This document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Steri-Oss 6 mm Diameter TPS Coated Implants) and does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving device performance in the context of an AI/ML system.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, multi-reader multi-case studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details. This type of information is typically found in submissions for AI/ML-powered diagnostic or assistive devices, which is not what this document describes.

The performance data section in this document states: "A mathematical justification demonstrates the substantial equivalence of the predicate to the Steri-Oss products." This refers to demonstrating that the new implant is as safe and effective as an existing, legally marketed implant (the predicate device), rather than a study with acceptance criteria for a specific performance metric like accuracy or sensitivity for an AI system.

§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.

(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.