(142 days)
The ClearTip FNA and FNB Types are intended for Ultrasonically Guided Fine Needle Aspiration, (FNA) of submucosal and extraluminal lesions of the Gastrointestinal Tract, (e.g., lymph nodes, abnormal tissue in the mediastinum).
The ClearTip is a manually operated endoscopic instrument intended to obtain tissue specimens of gastrointestinal tract (=digestive tract). The subject device mainly consists of a handle unit with an insertion part, a syringe, a stopcock, and a connector. ClearTip is offered in various needle gauges for insertion and aspiration. The available needle gauge sizes of 19, 22, and 25 gauge. The Needle which is dimpled for ultrasonic visualization is advanced into the target site for aspiration. The device allows for adjustment of the length of the coil sheath and the needle to enable the user to adjust for the working length of the endoscope and to control needle insertion depth. It is preloaded with a stylet to aid in inserting the Needle which is removed for injection and aspiration. This device passes through the working channel of endoscope, and the average contact time with mucosa of the human gastrointestinal tract is less than 1 hour. This device is supplied sterile for single-patient use and shall be not reused or re-sterilized.
This FDA 510(k) clearance letter pertains to a medical device, and as such, it does not detail acceptance criteria or a study that would demonstrate the device meets those criteria in the way typically seen for AI/software-as-medical-device (SaMD) products. This document describes a traditional medical device (a biopsy instrument), not an AI system.
The "acceptance criteria" and "device performance" mentioned in your request are usually quantifiable metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC) for SaMD products, often against a ground truth for diagnostic accuracy. For a physical device like the ClearTip FNA and FNB Types, acceptance criteria typically relate to physical properties, functionality, safety, and compatibility, which are assessed through non-clinical (engineering, bench) tests rather than clinical performance studies against a diagnostic "ground truth."
Therefore, I will extract the information provided based on the context of a physical medical device submission, focusing on the nearest equivalents to your requested categories.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Since this is a physical device, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by the performance standards for the non-clinical tests conducted. The reported "device performance" is typically that the device met these standards. The document does not provide specific numerical acceptance criteria or performance metrics for each test, but rather lists the types of tests performed.
| Acceptance Criteria Category (Implied) | Reported Device Performance (Implied) |
|---|---|
| Sterility Validation | Validated (device is sterilizable by EO) |
| Shelf-Life | 3 Years (device maintains integrity for this period) |
| Appearance | Met (device's visual characteristics are acceptable) |
| Dimensions | Met (device dimensions are within specified limits) |
| Operability | Met (device functions as intended) |
| Elasticity | Met (device's elastic properties are acceptable) |
| Bending Strength | Met (device withstands specified bending forces) |
| Pull-out | Met (device components withstand specified pull-out forces) |
| Tensile Force | Met (device components withstand specified tensile forces) |
| Biocompatibility | Met (device materials are biocompatible) |
| Endoscope Compatibility | Met (device is compatible with specified endoscope channels) |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
This document does not describe a "test set" in the context of clinical data for diagnostic performance. The "tests" mentioned are non-clinical (bench/engineering) tests conducted on the physical device itself. Therefore, information on sample size for a "test set" or "data provenance" (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not applicable or provided given the nature of the device and the submission.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
Not applicable. This is not an AI/SaMD product requiring expert-established ground truth for diagnostic accuracy. The "ground truth" for a physical device's performance often relates to engineering specifications and regulatory standards.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. No "test set" requiring adjudication in a clinical context is described.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done
No. An MRMC study is typically for evaluating diagnostic performance of imaging or AI systems with human readers. This clearance is for a physical biopsy instrument.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
No. This is not an algorithm or AI system.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this device's acceptance is based on engineering specifications, material standards, and regulatory requirements (e.g., for sterility, biocompatibility, mechanical strength). It is not pathology, outcomes data, or expert consensus in the diagnostic sense.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device does not involve a "training set" as it is not an AI/machine learning system.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable. There is no training set for this device.
FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter - ClearTip FNA and FNB Types
Page 1
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
Doc ID # 04017.08.00
August 21, 2025
FINEMEDIX Co., Ltd.
℅ Priscilla Chung
Regulatory Affairs Consultant
Lk Consulting Group USA, Inc.
18881 Von Karman Ave. STE 160
Irvine, California 92612
Re: K250994
Trade/Device Name: ClearTip FNA and FNB Types
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.1075
Regulation Name: Gastroenterology-Urology Biopsy Instrument
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: FCG
Dated: July 21, 2025
Received: July 21, 2025
Dear Priscilla Chung:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Page 2
K250994 - Priscilla Chung Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
Page 3
K250994 - Priscilla Chung Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
SIVAKAMI VENKATACHALAM -S
for
Shanil P. Haugen, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal,
Obesity and Transplant Devices
OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Page 4
Indications for Use
Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K250994
Please provide the device trade name(s). | ClearTip FNA and FNB Types
Please provide your Indications for Use below.
The ClearTip FNA and FNB Types are intended for Ultrasonically Guided Fine Needle Aspiration, (FNA) of submucosal and extraluminal lesions of the Gastrointestinal Tract, (e.g., lymph nodes, abnormal tissue in the mediastinum).
Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable).
- ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
- ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
ClearTip FNA and FNB Types Page 7 of 31
Page 5
510(K) SUMMARY
(K250994)
July 18, 2025
1. Submitted by:
FINEMEDIX Co., Ltd.
140-9, Yuram-ro, Dong-gu, Daegu, 41059
Republic of Korea
Tel : 82-53-741-8388, Fax : 82-53-741-8168
2. US Agent/ Official Correspondent:
Priscilla Chung
LK Consulting Group USA, Inc.
18881 Von Karman Ave STE 160
Irvine, CA 92612
Tel: 714.202.5789 Fax: 714.409.3357
Email: juhee.c@LKconsultingGroup.com
3. Device Name:
- Trade Name : ClearTip FNA and FNB Types
- Classification : Class II
- Classification Name : Gastroenterology-Urology Biopsy Instrument
- Product Code : FCG
- Regulation Number : 876.1075
- Review Panel : Gastroenterology/Urology
4. Predicate Devices:
- Primary Predicate Device: ClearTip (K231267) by FINEMEDIX Co., Ltd.
- Reference Device: Clear-Tip EUS-FNA (K180363) by FINEMEDIX Co., Ltd.
Page 1 of 4
K250994
Page 1 of 4
Page 6
5. Device Description:
The ClearTip is a manually operated endoscopic instrument intended to obtain tissue specimens of gastrointestinal tract (=digestive tract). The subject device mainly consists of a handle unit with an insertion part, a syringe, a stopcock, and a connector. ClearTip is offered in various needle gauges for insertion and aspiration. The available needle gauge sizes of 19, 22, and 25 gauge. The Needle which is dimpled for ultrasonic visualization is advanced into the target site for aspiration. The device allows for adjustment of the length of the coil sheath and the needle to enable the user to adjust for the working length of the endoscope and to control needle insertion depth. It is preloaded with a stylet to aid in inserting the Needle which is removed for injection and aspiration. This device passes through the working channel of endoscope, and the average contact time with mucosa of the human gastrointestinal tract is less than 1 hour. This device is supplied sterile for single-patient use and shall be not reused or re-sterilized.
6. Indications for Use Statement
The ClearTip FNA and FNB Types are intended for Ultrasonically Guided Fine Needle Aspiration, (FNA) of submucosal and extraluminal lesions of the Gastrointestinal Tract, (e.g., lymph nodes, abnormal tissue in the mediastinum).
7. Substantial Equivalence Discussion:
7.1. Comparison Chart
| Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Device | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FINEMEDIX Co., Ltd. | FINEMEDIX Co., Ltd. | FINEMEDIX Co., Ltd. |
| Device Name | ClearTip FNA and FNB Types | ClearTip | Clear-Tip EUS-FNA |
| 510(k) Number | K250994 | K231267 | K180363 |
| Device Classification Name | Gastroenterology-urology Biopsy instrument | Gastroenterology-urology Biopsy instrument | Gastroenterology-urology Biopsy instrument |
| Product Code | FCG | FCG | FCG |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 876.1075 | 21 CFR 876.1075 | 21 CFR 876.1075 |
| Indications for Use | The ClearTip FNA and FNB Types are intended for Ultrasonically Guided Fine Needle Aspiration, (FNA) of submucosal and extraluminal lesions of the Gastrointestinal Tract, (e.g., lymph nodes, abnormal tissue in the mediastinum). | The ClearTip is intended for Ultrasonically Guided Fine Needle Aspiration, (FNA) of submucosal and extraluminal lesions of the Tracheobronchial Tree and Gastrointestinal Tract, (e.g., lymph nodes, abnormal tissue in the mediastinum). | The Clear-Tip EUS-FNA is used with an ultrasound endoscope for fine needle biopsy of submucosal lesions, mediastinal masses, lymph nodes and intraperitoneal masses within or adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. |
| Needle Gauge | 19, 22, 25 Gauge | 22 Gauge | 19, 22, 25 Gauge |
| Needle Material | Stainless Steel, Nitinol | Nitinol | Stainless Steel |
| Needle length | 0~8 cm | 0~5 cm | 0~8cm |
Page 2 of 4
K250994
Page 2 of 4
Page 7
| Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Device | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjustment range | |||
| Stylet Material | Nitinol | Nitinol | Nitinol |
| Sheath length | 1,510 mm | 738.5 mm | 1,507 mm |
| Sheath Material | Stainless Steel | PEEK, PTFE | PEEK |
| Sheath length Adjustment range | 0~5cm | 0~3cm | 0~5cm |
| Accessory Channel Diameter | Minimum Accessory Channel Diameter (2.8 mm) | Minimum Accessory Channel Diameter (2.0 mm) | Minimum Accessory Channel Diameter (2.0 mm) |
| Use with a Syringe and stopcock | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Principle of Operation | Manual (sampling using aspiration) | Manual (sampling using aspiration) | Manual (sampling using aspiration) |
| Shelf life | 3 Years | 3 Years | 3 Years |
| Sterility | Ethylene oxide(EO) | Ethylene oxide(EO) | Ethylene oxide(EO) |
| Single use | Yes | Yes | Yes |
7.2. Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in the indications for use and technical characteristics including endoscope compatibility, use with a syringe and stopcock, principle of operation, sterility, and single use.
The differences are in needle gauge, needle length, adjustment range, and sheath length so we identified a reference device (K180363) which encompass the specifications. The sheath material is also different; however, we conducted biocompatibility and performance testing and the test results supports that these differences do not raise a question in safety and effectiveness.
8. Non-clinical Tests
The following tests were performed on the subject device and the test results support that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
- Sterilization Validation
- Shelf-Life Test
- Appearance
- Dimensions
- Operability
- Elasticity
- Bending Strength
- Pull-out
- Tensile Force
- Biocompatibility Tests
Page 3 of 4
K250994
Page 3 of 4
Page 8
- Endoscope Compatibility Test
9. Conclusion:
Based on the information provided herein and the test results, we conclude that the subject device is substantially equivalent to its predicate device.
Page 4 of 4
K250994
Page 4 of 4
§ 876.1075 Gastroenterology-urology biopsy instrument.
(a)
Identification. A gastroenterology-urology biopsy instrument is a device used to remove, by cutting or aspiration, a specimen of tissue for microscopic examination. This generic type of device includes the biopsy punch, gastrointestinal mechanical biopsy instrument, suction biopsy instrument, gastro-urology biopsy needle and needle set, and nonelectric biopsy forceps. This section does not apply to biopsy instruments that have specialized uses in other medical specialty areas and that are covered by classification regulations in other parts of the device classification regulations.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (performance standards).(2) Class I for the biopsy forceps cover and the non-electric biopsy forceps. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.