(90 days)
FAQ™ 302 is indicated to promote hair growth in males with androgenetic alopecia who have Hamilton-Norwood Classifications of Ila-V and females with androgenetic alopecia who have Ludwig-Savin Classifications of I-II and Fitzpatrick Classification of Skin Phototypes I to IV.
FAQ™ 302 is a handheld rechargeable square shaped device designed for improving hair growth with 20 laser diodes (wavelength 650±10m) and 20 RED LED beads (640-660nm) on the inside surface.
By pressing the universal button, the user can power the device on, start treatment and change the intensity by quick-pressing the button again. Once the treatment is complete, the device is turned off by pressing and holding the universal power button for 3 seconds.
The device can also be connected wirelessly via Bluetooth to an FAQ App in order to manage treatment. After the treatment is completed, the device automatically powers off.
The device uses a non-detachable polymer lithium battery for power supply in compliance with IEC 62133-2:2017+A1:2021 standard.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the FAQ™ 302 device, based on the provided FDA 510(k) summary:
This device (FAQ™ 302) is an Infrared Lamp intended to promote hair growth. The 510(k) summary explicitly states that clinical testing was considered not to be needed for this 510(k). Therefore, the provided document does not contain information about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria related to its clinical effectiveness (i.e., promoting hair growth). Instead, the studies presented are non-clinical tests to demonstrate safety and performance equivalence to predicate devices.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Since clinical efficacy was "considered not to be needed," the acceptance criteria are not for clinical effectiveness but rather for safety, electrical performance, software functionality, cybersecurity, and usability. The document focuses on demonstrating that the new device is substantially equivalent to predicate devices based on these non-clinical aspects.
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Standard/Requirement | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Biocompatibility | ISO 10993-5: In Vitro Cytotoxicity | Device tested in compliance; no additional risks noted. |
| ISO 10993-10: Irritation and Skin Sensitization | Device tested in compliance; no additional risks noted. | |
| ISO 10993-23: Tests for irritation | Device tested in compliance. | |
| Electrical Safety | IEC 60601-1:2005/AMD1:2012/AMD2:2020, CAN/CSA-C22.2 NO. 60601-1:14, AAMI 60601-1:2005 + AMD 1:2012 (General Req.) | Device tested to applicable electrical performance standards. |
| IEC 60601-1-6:2010+AMD1:2013+AMD2:2020 (Usability Collateral Standard) | Device tested to applicable electrical performance standards. | |
| IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020 (Usability Engineering) | Device tested to applicable electrical performance standards. | |
| IEC 60601-1-11:2015+AMD1:2020 (Home Healthcare Environment) | Device tested to applicable electrical performance standards. | |
| IEC 60601-2-57: 2011 (Non-laser light source) | Device tested to applicable electrical performance standards. | |
| EMC | EN 60601-1-2: 2015, IEC 60601-1-2: 2014 (Edition 4) (Electromagnetic disturbances) | Device tested to applicable electrical performance standards. |
| IEC TR 60601-4-2:2016 (Electromagnetic immunity) | Device tested to applicable electrical performance standards. | |
| Software Functionality | Minor level of concern per FDA guidance "Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions" | All software requirement specifications are met and all software hazards have been mitigated to acceptable risk levels. |
| Cybersecurity | Evaluation of assets, threats, vulnerabilities, impact, likelihood, risk levels, mitigation, residual risk | All risks associated with network capable interfaces adequately mitigated. Cybersecurity risk analysis performed, controls identified, comparison with National Vulnerability Database, and labeling information detailed in Cybersecurity Assessment. |
| Usability | User instruction provides adequate guidance for independent and appropriate home use for Laser and LED treatment | Test results in "Usability validation report" clearly indicate this. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Biocompatibility Testing: The document does not specify the sample size (e.g., number of test specimens or replicates) for the biocompatibility tests.
- Electrical Safety and EMC Testing: The document does not specify the sample size used for these compliance tests, as these are typically conducted on a representative sample of the device itself rather than patient data.
- Software Verification and Validation: The document does not specify the number of test cases or data points for software validation.
- Cybersecurity: This involved an analysis, not a test set with patient data.
- Usability Study:
- Sample Size: 15 adults
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective). It is implied to be prospective as it's a "validation testing" that "was conducted."
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
- For all non-clinical tests (biocompatibility, electrical safety, EMC, software, cybersecurity): "Ground truth" in the sense of clinical expert consensus is not applicable. These tests rely on established engineering and scientific standards. The "experts" involved would be the testing engineers and scientists responsible for conducting and interpreting these standard-based tests. Qualifications are not specified, but they would be presumed to be competent in the relevant fields.
- For the Usability Study: The document does not mention experts establishing a "ground truth" for usability. The study assessed whether adult users could follow instructions.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not applicable as no clinical test set requiring expert adjudication was performed.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. The document explicitly states: "Clinical testing was considered not to be needed for this 510(k)." The device's substantial equivalence is based on non-clinical performance and a comparison of its technical specifications and indications for use with legally marketed predicate devices.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study
- Not applicable. This device is a hardware device (infrared lamp) with embedded software, not a standalone AI algorithm. The software verification and validation section relates to its internal software functionality, not an AI or standalone diagnostic/treatment algorithm.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- Biocompatibility, Electrical Safety, EMC: Ground truth refers to compliance with established international and national standards (e.g., ISO, IEC, AAMI compliance).
- Software: Ground truth refers to predefined software requirements and specifications, and the mitigation of identified software hazards.
- Cybersecurity: Ground truth refers to industry best practices, identified risks and vulnerabilities (including comparison with the National Vulnerability Database), and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.
- Usability Study: Ground truth for this study was the ability of the users to follow the provided instructions to safely and appropriately use the device.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set" in the context of learning from data to perform a diagnostic or treatment task. Software validation was performed but does not involve a training set as understood in AI/ML.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not applicable, as no training set was used for an AI/ML algorithm.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" in a square and the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION".
December 11, 2024
Foreo Inc. % Danijela Domljanovic Consultant DD Consulting 401-4080 Living Arts Drive Mississauga, ON L5B4N# Canada
Re: K242747
Trade/Device Name: Faq™ (302) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.5500 Regulation Name: Infrared Lamp Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OAP Dated: August 13, 2024 Received: September 12, 2024
Dear Danijela Domljanovic:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory
{2}------------------------------------------------
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by YAN
YAN FU -S FU-S
Date: 2024.12.11 17:37:39
-05'00'
for Tanisha Hithe
Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K242747
Device Name FAOTM (302)
Indications for Use (Describe)
FAO™ 302 is indicated to promote hair growth in males with androgenetic alopecia who have Hamilton-Norwood Classifications of Ila-V and females with androgenetic alopecia who have Ludwig-Savin Classifications of I-II and Fitzpatrick Classification of Skin Phototypes I to IV.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | |
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ☒ |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/2 description: The image shows the word "FOREO" in white letters against a pink background. The letters are simple and sans-serif. The right side of the image has a pattern of blue dots on the pink background, creating a textured effect.
510(k) Summary
Date of Summary Revision: 28-Aug-2024
Submitter's Identifications 1.
Submitter's Name: FOREO Inc. Address: 1525 E Pama Lane, Las Vegas, NV, USA ZIP Code: 89119 Contact Person: Evan Feldstein Contact Title: General Manager Contact E-mail Address: evan.feldstein@foreo.com Telephone: 419 376 1923
2. Correspondent's Identifications
Correspondent's Name: DD Consulting Address: 401-4080 Living Arts Drive, Mississauga, ON Canada ZIP Code: L5B 4N3 Contact Person: Danijela Domljanovic Contact Title: Regulatory Consultant Contact E-mail Address: regulatoryna@foreo.com Telephone: 647 928 6919
Name of the Device 3.
Trade Name: FAQ Model: FAQ 302 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.5500 Regulation Name: Infrared Lamp Common Name: Laser, Comb, Hair Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OAP Review Panel: General & Plastic Surgery
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the text 'K242747' in black font on a pink background with white polka dots. The text is large and bold, filling most of the frame. The polka dots are evenly distributed across the background, providing a patterned contrast to the solid black text.
Image /page/5/Picture/2 description: The image shows the word "FOREO" in white letters against a pink background. The letters are large and spaced out, filling most of the frame. The background is a solid pink color with a pattern of small blue dots in the upper right corner.
4. The Predicate Devices
Primary Predicate: K210169 Hair Growth Device Primary Predicate: HairMax LaserComb 41
Device Description 5.
FAQ™ 302 is a handheld rechargeable square shaped device designed for improving hair growth with 20 laser diodes (wavelength 650±10m) and 20 RED LED beads (640-660nm) on the inside surface.
By pressing the universal button, the user can power the device on, start treatment and change the intensity by quick-pressing the button again. Once the treatment is complete, the device is turned off by pressing and holding the universal power button for 3 seconds.
The device can also be connected wirelessly via Bluetooth to an FAQ App in order to manage treatment. After the treatment is completed, the device automatically powers off.
The device uses a non-detachable polymer lithium battery for power supply in compliance with IEC 62133-2:2017+A1:2021 standard.
Intended Use of Device 6.
FAQ™ 302 is indicated to promote hair growth in males with androgenetic alopecia who have Hamilton-Norwood Classifications of Ila-V and females with androgenetic alopecia who have Ludwig-Savin Classifications of I-II and Fitzpatrick Classification of Skin Phototypes I to IV.
Comparison with Predicate Device 7.
Table 1 Table Comparison of FAQ 302,LS-D601 (K210169) and HairMax LaserComb 41(K142573)
| Features | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Predicate Device | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory Information | ||||
| Device Name | FAQ™ 302 | Hair Growth Device | HairMax LaserComb 41 | / |
| 510(K) No. | K242747 | K210169 | K142573 | / |
| Regulation Number | 890.5500 | 890.5500 | 890.5500 | Same |
| Regulation name | Infrared Lamp | Infrared Lamp | Infrared Lamp | Same |
| Regulatory Class | II | II | II | Same |
| Product Code | OAP | OAP | OAP | Same |
| Indications for Use | FAQ™ 302 is indicated topromote hair growth inmales with androgeneticalopecia who haveHamilton-NorwoodClassifications of IIa-V andfemales with androgeneticalopecia who have Ludwig-Savin Classifications of I-IIand FitzpatrickClassification of SkinPhototypes I to IV | The Hair Growth Deviceis indicated to promotehair growth in maleswith androgeneticalopecia who haveHamilton-NorwoodClassifications of IIa-Vand females withandrogenetic alopeciawho have Ludwig-SavinClassifications of1-II andFitzpatrick Classificationof Skin Phototypes I toIV. | The HairMax LaserComb41 is indicated to treatAndrogenetic alopeciaand promote hair growthin males who haveNorwood HamiltonClassifications of IIa to Vpatterns of hair loss andtreat Androgeneticalopecia and, promotehair growth in femaleswho have Ludwig (Savin)Scale I-4, II-1, II-2, orfrontal, both withFitzpatrick Skin Types I toIV. | Same |
| Treatmentregimen | 8 minutes every other day | 25 minutes every other day | 3 minutes per use,three times per week | DifferentNote 1 |
| Use Environment | Home Use, over thecounter | Home Use, over thecounter | Home Use, over thecounter | Same |
| Power Source(s) | Internal rechargeableLithium battery | Power adapter | Internal rechargeableLithium battery | DifferentNote 2 |
| Maximum charging time | 90 mins | Not applicable | Unknown | / |
| Electrical Power SourceFrequency (Nominal) | 60Hz | 60 Hz | 60 Hz | Same |
| Method of ChannelIsolation | Type BF | Type BF | Type BF | Same |
| Automatic Shut Off | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Mode of operation | Low-level laser diodes andlight emitting diodes | Low-level laser diodes andlight emitting diodes | Low-level laser diodes | Similar |
| Output mode | Continuous light | Continuous light | Continuous light | Same |
| Classificationaccording to IEC60825-1 | Class 3R | Class 3R | Class 3R | Same |
| Energy of perlaser diode | <5mW | <5mW | <5mW | Same |
| Wavelength | Laser: 650±10nmRed light LED: 640-660nm | Laser: 650-660nmRed light LED: 640-660nm | Laser: 655±10nm | Similar |
| No. of light sources | Laser diodes: 20 lasers LEDdiodes: 20 | Laser diodes: 26 lasersLED diodes: 30 | Lasers LED diodes: 41 | DifferentNote 3 |
| Treatment Area | Approx. 32cm2 | Unknown | Approx. 40cm2 | DifferentNote 3 |
{6}------------------------------------------------
. Page 3 of 6
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the text 'K242747' in a bold, sans-serif font. The text is black and is set against a pink background with white dots. The letters and numbers are evenly spaced and fill most of the frame.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image shows the text 'K242747' in black font against a pink background with white polka dots. The text is bold and fills most of the frame. The polka dots are small and evenly distributed across the background.
Comparison in Details
Note 1:
The proposed device treatment time is within the range of the predicate devices, and the treatment time of the proposed device does not raise new types of questions regarding safety and effectiveness.
Note 2:
Though the power source is different the proposed device was tested to applicable electrical performance standards.
Note 3:
The number of light sources, treatment area, wavelength, are similar to the predicate devices, and do not raise new types of questions with regard to safety and effectiveness.
8. Non-Clinical Tests Performed:
Clinical testing was considered not to be needed for this 510(k).
The following non-clinical testing was provided in this 510(k):
Biocompatibility Testing
The subject device has been tested in compliance with the following standards and no additional risks concerning safety and effectiveness were noted;
- ISO 10993-5, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 5: Tests for InVitro Cytotoxicity ●
- ISO 10993-10, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 10: Tests for ● Irritation and Skin Sensitization.
{8}------------------------------------------------
- ISO 10993-23 Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 23: Tests for irritation
Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing
| Category | Standards | Standards Desc |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | IEC60601-1:2005/AMD1:2012/AMD2:2020CAN/CSA-C22.2 NO. 60601-1:14AAMI 60601-1:2005 + AMD 1:2012 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: Generalrequirements for basic safety and essential performance |
| IEC 60601-1-6:2010+ AMD1:2013+AMD2:2020 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-6: Generalrequirements for basic safety and essential performance -Collateral standard: Usability | |
| IEC 62366-1:2015+ AMD1:2020 | Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usabilityengineering to medical devices | |
| IEC 60601-1-11:2015+AMD1:2020 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-11: Generalrequirements for basic safety and essential performance -Collateral Standard: Requirements for medical electricalequipment and medical electrical systems used in thehome healthcare environment | |
| IEC 60601-2-57: 2011 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-57: Particularrequirements for the basic safety and essentialperformance of non-laser light source equipment intendedfor therapeutic, diagnostic, monitoring andcosmetic/aesthetic use | |
| EMC | EN 60601-1-2: 2015IEC 60601-1-2: 2014 (Edition 4) | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: Generalrequirements for basic safety and essential performance -Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances -Requirements and tests |
| IEC TR 60601-4-2:2016 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 4-2: Guidance andinterpretation - Electromagnetic immunity: performanceof medical electrical equipment and medical electricalsystems |
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/0 description: The image shows the text 'K242747' in black font on a pink background with white polka dots. The text is bold and easily readable against the contrasting background. The letters and numbers are evenly spaced and aligned horizontally.
Software Verification and Validation
Software documentation consistent with Minor level of concern was submitted in this 510(k) per the FDA guidance document, "Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions" issued on June 14, 2023. System validation testing presented in this 510(k) demonstrated that all software requirement specifications are met and all software hazards have been mitigated to acceptable risk levels.
Cybersecurity
The cybersecurity risks associated with the FAQ™ 302 were evaluated as follows:
- Identification of assets, threats, and vulnerabilities;
- Assessment of impact of threats and vulnerabilities on device functionality and end user;
- Assessment of the likelihood of threats and of a vulnerability being exploited;
- Determination of risk levels and suitable mitigation strategies;
- Assessment of residual risk and risk acceptance criteria
The cybersecurity risk analysis performed, the controls identified, the comparison with the National Vulnerability Database, and the labeling information detailed with the Cybersecurity Assessment demonstrated that all risks associated with network capable interfaces of the device have been adequately mitigated.
9. Usability Study:
Usability validation testing was conducted with 15 adults enrolled to assure that the user could follow the directions we provided to safely use the device. Test results can be located in the "Usability validation report" that clearly indicate that the user instruction of FAQ 302 provides adequate guidance for the independent and appropriate home use for Laser and LED treatment.
Conclusion: 10.
Based on comparison of intended use and technical characteristics, the subject device FAQ 302 is similar to the legally marketed predicate LS-D601. Hardware and software verification and validation demonstrated the FAQ 302 met all performance specifications.
Any differences between the FAQ 302 and the predicate devices do not raise new types of questions of safety and effectiveness. Therefore, the FAQ 302 is substantially equivalent to the predicate one.
§ 890.5500 Infrared lamp.
(a)
Identification. An infrared lamp is a device intended for medical purposes that emits energy at infrared frequencies (approximately 700 nanometers to 50,000 nanometers) to provide topical heating.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an infrared therapeutic heating lamp, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 890.9.