(49 days)
Not Found
No
The summary describes a physical intervertebral body fusion device made of PEEK and tantalum markers. There is no mention of software, algorithms, or any computational processing that would suggest the use of AI or ML. The performance studies focus on mechanical properties and design modifications, not algorithmic performance.
Yes
The device is intended for intervertebral body fusion to treat degenerative disc disease, which is a medical condition, making it a therapeutic device.
No.
The device is an intervertebral body fusion device used for treatment, not for diagnosing conditions. It facilitates fusion and is implanted surgically.
No
The device description clearly states that the EARP Interbody System is a physical implant manufactured from PEEK OPTIMA® LT1 with tantalum markers. It is a hardware device intended for surgical implantation.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are medical devices used to perform tests on samples taken from the human body (like blood, urine, tissue) to provide information about a person's health.
- Device Description and Intended Use: The EARP Interbody System is a physical implant (an intervertebral body fusion device) intended to be surgically placed in the lumbar spine to facilitate bone fusion. It is a therapeutic device, not a diagnostic one.
- Lack of Diagnostic Function: The device itself does not perform any tests on biological samples or provide diagnostic information. While radiographic studies are used to assess the patient's condition and the device's placement, the device itself is not involved in the diagnostic process.
Therefore, the EARP Interbody System is a surgical implant, not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The EARP Interbody System is intended for intervertebral body fusion in the lumbar spine in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1 of the lumbosacral spine. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage. DDD patients may also have Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved levels. The device system must be used with supplemental fixation and autograft and/or allogeneic bone graft composed of cancellous, cortical, and/or corticocancellous bone to facilitate fusion and are implanted via a posterolateral approach.
Product codes
MAX
Device Description
The EARP Interbody System is an intervertebral body fusion device used in the lumbar spine following discectomy. All devices are manufactured from PEEK OPTIMA® LT1 per ASTM F2026 and include tantalum markers per ASTM F560 for radio-graphic visualization.
The devices have multiple footprints to adapt to the general shape of the vertebral endplates and have a hollow center to accommodate bone graft. Each footprint is available in multiple heights to accommodate patient variability and there are anti-migration features on the superior and inferior surfaces designed to improve fixation, stability, and prevent back out and migration.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
lumbar spine, L2 to S1 of the lumbosacral spine
Indicated Patient Age Range
skeletally mature patients
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Analysis of the subject device modifications verified that they would not impact function or performance. Results of this analysis demonstrated that the additional sizing options, as well as minor design updates to the spacer and inclusion of an additional tantalum marker, would not negatively impact mechanical strength, instrument mating, anatomic fit, bone grafting, or radiographic visualization. Accordingly, the analysis supported the conclusion that the subject EARP Interbody System is substantially equivalent to the predicates.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 7, 2024
Retropsoas Technologies, LLC % Jeffrey Brittan Vice President of Product Realization SpiTrex 3D (Watershed Idea Foundry, Inc. dba SpiTrex 3D) 1815 Aston Ave., Ste 106 Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: K242457
Trade/Device Name: EARP Interbody System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: August 16, 2024 Received: August 19, 2024
Dear Mr. Brittan:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
1
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Brent Showalter -S
Brent Showalter, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
2
Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
Device Name
EARP Interbody System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The EARP Interbody System is intended for intervertebral body fusion in the lumbar spine in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiquous levels from L2 to S1 of the lumbosacral spine. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage. DDD patients may also have Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved levels. The device system must be used with supplemental fixation and autograft and/or allogeneic bone graft composed of cancellous, cortical, and/or corticocancellous bone to facilitate fusion and are implanted via a posterolateral approach.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW *
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
K242457 510(k) Summary
| Applicant | Retropsoas Technologies, LLC
34 Countryside Lane
Frontenac, MO 63131 USA
Telephone: 618-402-0035
Contact: Dr. Nicholas Poulos, CEO
Email: npoulos@retropsoas.com |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Correspondent | Jeffrey Brittan
Vice President of Product Realization
SpiTrex 3D (Watershed Idea Foundry, Inc. dba SpiTrex 3D)
Telephone: 714-287-6780
Email: jeffbrittan@spitrexorthopedics.com |
DEVICE NAME
| Device Trade Name | EARP Interbody System |
|---|---|
| Common Name | Intervertebral Fusion Device with Bone Graft, Lumbar |
| Classification Name | Intervertebral body fusion device |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 888.3080 |
| Product Code | MAX |
LEGALLY MARKETED PREDICATE DEVICES
| Predicate # | K212477 |
|---|---|
| Predicate Trade Name | EARP Interbody System |
| Product Code | MAX |
| Predicate # | K193645 |
|---|---|
| Predicate Trade Name | nva, nvp, and nvt |
| Product Code | MAX |
4
DEVICE DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
The EARP Interbody System is an intervertebral body fusion device used in the lumbar spine following discectomy. All devices are manufactured from PEEK OPTIMA® LT1 per ASTM F2026 and include tantalum markers per ASTM F560 for radio-graphic visualization.
The devices have multiple footprints to adapt to the general shape of the vertebral endplates and have a hollow center to accommodate bone graft. Each footprint is available in multiple heights to accommodate patient variability and there are anti-migration features on the superior and inferior surfaces designed to improve fixation, stability, and prevent back out and migration.
INTENDED USE / INDICATIONS FOR USE
The EARP Interbody System is intended for intervertebral body fusion in the lumbar spine in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1 of the lumbosacral spine. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage. DDD patients may also have Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved levels. The device system must be used with supplemental fixation and autograft and/or allogeneic bone graft composed of cancellous, cortical, and/or corticocancellous bone to facilitate fusion and are implanted via a posterolateral approach.
INDICATIONS FOR USE COMPARISON
The only modification to the Indications for Use for the subject device in comparison to the predicate device is to add text clarifying the option for use with allogenic bone graft. This update helps to further align wording regarding grafting with that of other recently cleared intervertebral body fusion devices with the same intended use; it does not alter device performance characteristics or the surgical technique used to implant the device, and the intended use of the subject device remains the same.
TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON
The subject device has been updated with 50mm width options and minor design updates that maintain equivalent design characteristics, materials, chemical composition, and principle of operation as the predicate devices.
NON-CLINICAL TESTS SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS
Analysis of the subject device modifications verified that they would not impact function or performance. Results of this analysis demonstrated that the additional sizing options, as well as minor design updates to the spacer and inclusion of an additional tantalum marker, would not negatively impact mechanical strength, instrument mating, anatomic fit, bone grafting, or radiographic visualization. Accordingly, the analysis supported the conclusion that the subject EARP Interbody System is substantially equivalent to the predicates.