(272 days)
The CORE Shoulder System is a handheld surgical instrument with computer-assisted instrument tracking and is intended to assist the surgeon with placement of the K-wire (central guide pin) used in the preparation of the glenoid and the positioning of the glenoid component during primary Anatomic or Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The CORE Shoulder System tracks the live position of the instruments relative to an untracked virtual anatomical model. It does not track the patient anatomy.
The CORE Shoulder System is designed for use with the following LINK Implant systems:
The CORE Shoulder System is a handheld surgical instrument with computer-assisted instrument tracking and is intended to assist the surgeon with placement of the K-wire (central guide pin) used in the preparation of the glenoid and the positioning of the glenoid component during primary Anatomic or Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. CORE Shoulder assists the surgeon in placing the K-wire according to the preoperatively planned location. The CORE Shoulder System tracks the live position of the instruments relative to an untracked virtual anatomical model. It does not track the patient anatomy.
It allows the surgeon to visually compare the planned and placed position/trajectory of the guide pin (K-wire) by referencing a virtual 3D model of the pre-operative plan and the measured location of the K-wire. The system components include the Workstation (tablet, AC adapter, stand), the handheld COREmote (single-use Power Unit and reusable Sensor Unit), and reusable stainless-steel probes of different sizes.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the CORE Shoulder System, a surgical instrument with computer-assisted instrument tracking. It does not describe an AI/ML-based medical device. Therefore, it does not contain the specific information required to answer the prompt regarding AI/ML device performance.
The document focuses on the substantial equivalence of the CORE Shoulder System to a predicate device, based on non-clinical performance testing. It explicitly states that "Clinical performance testing was not required to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of this device." This implies that there was no study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in terms of clinical outcomes or human reader performance with AI assistance, as would be expected for an AI/ML device.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device, the study proving it meets those criteria, sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, expert ground truth establishment, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details, or ground truth establishment for the training set, as these details are not present in the provided 510(k) summary.
§ 888.3660 Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.
(a)
Identification. A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”