(254 days)
The Oxygen Concentrator provide supplemental oxygen to patients who require supplemental O2, by separating nitrogen from room air, by way of a molecular sieve, it can be used in the home or health care facility. It is not intended to sustain or support life.
The Oxygen Concentrator is a portable concentrator which could utilize a molecular sieve and pressure swing adsorption to produce the oxygen. The device could separate nitrogen by absorbing through the molecular sieve when the room air enters the device, and allows the enriched oxygen to be collected. The device could provide approximately 90~96% of oxygen to patients on a continuous flow basis at a rate of 1L/min to 10L/min. The nasal cannula are not sold with the device, users need to purchase the accessories by themselves that are legally marketed. The products have not undergone biocompatibility assessment of condensate precipitates according to ISO18562-4, and it is not recommended to use humidification bottles. The maximum altitude the subject device can operate without degradation of concentration is 2000m.
I am sorry, but based on the provided text, I cannot extract the specific acceptance criteria and study details as requested. The document is a 510(k) summary for an Oxygen Concentrator, which primarily compares the subject device to a predicate device and outlines non-clinical tests performed. It does not contain sections detailing acceptance criteria for specific performance metrics with reported results, sample sizes for test sets, expert qualifications for ground truth establishment, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance studies, types of ground truth used, or details about the training set.
The document states:
- "Clinical testing was not needed for this 510(k). The non-clinical performance testing described above is sufficient to support that the device can be used safely and effectively."
Therefore, there is no information about a study that would include elements like test set sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, or MRMC studies for this oxygen concentrator.
The "Performance Comparison" table in the document provides technical specifications and comparisons to the predicate device, but these are not presented as "acceptance criteria" with "reported device performance" in the format typically used for studies validating diagnostic or AI-based devices. The reported values are descriptive technical specifications rather than outcomes from a performance study against predefined acceptance criteria.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and details because the provided text does not contain a study demonstrating device performance against explicitly defined acceptance criteria in the manner you described.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
December 6, 2024
Foshan Care Medical Technology Co., Ltd. % Cassie Lee Official Correspondent Share Info (Guangzhou) Medical Consultant Ltd. No. 1919-1920, Building D3, Minjie Plaza, Shuixi Road Huangpu District Guangzhou, Guangdong 510530 China
Re: K240840
Trade/Device Name: Oxygen Concentrator (ZY-10AB/115) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5440 Regulation Name: Portable Oxygen Generator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: CAW Dated: November 4, 2024 Received: November 4, 2024
Dear Cassie Lee:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory
{2}------------------------------------------------
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
FDA
Linta Farooq -S 2024.12.06 11:40:07 -05'00'
For
Bradley Quinn Assistant Director DHT1C: Division of Anesthesia, Respiratory, and Sleep Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K240840
Device Name Oxygen Concentrator (ZY-10AB/115)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Oxygen Concentrator provide supplemental oxygen to patients who require supplemental 02, by separating nitrogen from room air, by way of a molecular sieve, it can be used in the home or health care facility. It is not intended to sustain or support life.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|---|---|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary of K240840
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirement of 21 CFR 807.92.
1. Submitter's Information
Company Name: FOSHAN CARE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. Establishment Registration Number: 3008220943 Address: #2 Haitang Rd, National Ecological Industrial Park Danzao, Town, Nanhai District Foshan Guangdong, China Contact Person (including title): Leona Zhou (Regulatory Affair Manager) Tel: 086 18666388285 Fax: / Post code: 528000 E-mail: zhouliming@caremedical.com.cn
Application Correspondent:
Contact Person: Ms. Cassie Lee Share Info (Guangzhou) Medical Consultant Ltd. Address: No. 1919-1920, Building D3, Minije Plaza, Shuixi Road, Huangpu District, Guangzhou, China Tel : +86 20 8266 2446 Email : 382198657@gg.com
Subject Device Information: 2.
Type of 510(k): Traditional Common Name: Portable Oxygen Concentrator Classification Name: Generator, Oxygen, Portable Trade Name: Oxygen Concentrator Model Name: ZY-10AB/115 Review Panel: Anesthesiology Product Code: CAW Regulation Number: 868.5440 Requlatory Class: II
Predicate Device Information 3.
Sponsor: Zhengzhou Olive Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Trade Name: Oxygen concentrator Model: OLV-5S, OLV-10S Common Name: Portable Oxygen Concentrator Classification Name: Generator, Oxygen, Portable 510(K) Number: K222920 Review Panel: Anesthesiology Product Code: CAW Regulation Number: 868.5440 Requlation Class: .
Device Description 4.
The Oxygen Concentrator is a portable concentrator which could utilize a molecular sieve and pressure swing adsorption to produce the oxygen. The device could separate nitrogen by absorbing through the molecular sieve when the room air enters the device, and allows the enriched oxygen to be collected. The device could provide approximately 90~96% of oxygen to patients on a continuous flow basis at a rate of 1L/min to 10L/min. The nasal cannula are not sold with the device, users need to purchase the accessories by themselves that are legally marketed. The products have not undergone biocompatibility
{5}------------------------------------------------
assessment of condensate precipitates according to ISO18562-4, and it is not recommended to use humidification bottles.
The maximum altitude the subject device can operate without degradation of concentration is 2000m.
5. Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Oxygen Concentrator provide supplemental oxygen to patients who require supplemental O2, by separating nitrogen from room air, by way of a molecular sieve, it can be used in the home or health care facility. It is not intended to sustain or support life.
6. Intended patient population
- Population: adult
- Age: above 18 years old •
- . Health status: adult patients requiring supplemental oxygen.
| 7. Comparison to predicate devicesElements ofComparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company | FOSHAN CARE MEDICALTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. | Zhengzhou Olive ElectronicTechnology Co., Ltd. | -- |
| Trade Name | Oxygen Concentrator | Oxygen Concentrator | -- |
| Model | ZY-10AB/115 | OLV-5S, OLV-10S | -- |
| Classification Name | Generator, Oxygen, Portable | Generator, Oxygen, Portable | Same |
| 510(k) Number | K240840 | K222920 | -- |
| Product Code | CAW | CAW | Same |
| Intended Use /Indications for Use | The Oxygen Concentratorprovide supplemental oxygen topatients who requiresupplemental O2, by separatingnitrogen from room air, by way ofa molecular sieve, it can be usedin the home or health carefacility. It is not intended tosustain or support life. | The Oxygen concentratorprovide supplemental oxygento patients with respiratorydisorders, by separatingnitrogen from room air, by wayof a molecular sieve, it can beused in the home or healthcare facility. It is not intendedto sustain or support life. | Same |
| Work principle | Pressure swing adsorptionprinciple, filtering by molecularsieve | Pressure swing adsorptionprinciple, filtering by molecularsieve | Same |
| Working mode | Continuous | Continuous | Same |
| Environments of Use | Home or health care facility | Home or health care facility | Same |
| Intended patientpopulation | Population: adultAge: above 18 years oldHealth status: adult patientsrequiring supplementaloxygen. | Patients with respiratorydisorders | SimilarNote 6 |
| Performance Comparison | |||
| Power supply | AC 100-120V, 60Hz | AC 120V±11V, 60Hz±1Hz | Same |
| Max.Input power | 550VA | OLV-5S: 500VAOLV-10S: 800VA | SimilarNote 1 |
| Elements ofComparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Verdict |
| Oxygenconcentration | 93% ± 3% | 93% ± 3% | Same |
| Oxygen flow | 1-10L/min | OLV-5S: 0-5L/minOLV-10S: 0-10L/min | SimilarNote 2 |
| Outlet pressure | 40kPa-80kPa | 20kPa-60kPa | SimilarNote 2 |
| Noise | ≤60dB (A) under max. flowrate | ≤70dB (A) under max. flowrate | SimilarNote 1 |
| Electricalclassification | Class II Type BF | Class II Type B | SimilarNote 1 |
| Alarm | Low Oxygen purity;Low & high pressure;Power loss alarm;Oxygen Sensor failure;Flow rate less than 0.4L/Min;Display Circuit Board failure | Low Oxygen purity;Low & high pressure;Overheating;Compressor failure;Obstruction of gas pathway;Pressure failure | DifferentNote 3 |
| Oxygen concentrationwarning | <82%, indicator yellow light andmedium Blinking (0.4Hz-0.8Hz),auditory signal: Di-Di-Di16±1 seconds interval anddisplay error code "E2";<73%±3%, indicator red light andfast Blinking (0.4Hz-0.8Hz),auditory signal: Di-Di-Di----Di-Di4±1 seconds interval and displayerror code "E1" | <82%±3%, indicator lightshows dual color (red andgreen mixed color);<65%±3%, indicator light isshown in red, and "lowconcentration" is displayed onthe display screen | SimilarNote 2 |
| Operating system | Time cycle/ Pressure swingadsorption | Time cycle/ Pressure swingadsorption | Same |
| Software/Hardware | Analog and digital electronicswith microprocessor | Analog and digital electronicswith microprocessor | Same |
| LCD display | Running time;Accumulating timing | Accumulating timing; presenttiming; timing | SimilarNote 4 |
| Accessories | manual | power supply, power cord,manual | SimilarNote 4 |
| Dimensions | 620 x 370 x 345mm | 350 x 250 x 670 mm | SimilarNote 4 |
| Safety Comparison | |||
| Sieve Bed | Synthetic Zeolite | Synthetic Zeolite | Same |
| Biocompatibility ofmaterialscontacting user | ISO 18562-2:2017,ISO 18562-3:2017 | Cytotoxicity, Comply withISO 10993-5;Irritation, Sensitization, complywith ISO 10993-10,ISO 18562-2:2017,ISO 18562-3:2017. | SimilarNote 5 |
| EMC | Comply with IEC60601-1-2:2014+A1:2020 | Comply with IEC60601-1-2:2014+A1:2020 | Same |
| Electric safety | Comply with IEC 60601-1-11:2015/AMD1:2020,ISO 80601-2-69:2014,IEC 80601-1-8:2020IEC 60601-1:2005/AMD2:2020 | Comply with IEC60601-1:2005+A1:2012,ISO 80601-2-69:2014, IEC60601-1-8:2006+A1:2012,IEC 60601-1-11:2015 | Same |
7 Comparison to predicate devices
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
Comparison in Detail(s):
Note 1:
Although the "Max. Input power", "Noise" and "Electrication are slightly different from the predicate device, all of them meet the requirement of safety and performance ISO 80601-2-69. The differences between the predicate device and subject device will not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device.
Note 2:
The "Oxygen flow" "Outlet pressure" and "Oxygen concentration warning" of subject device are similar with predicate device, all of them meet the requirement of safety and performance ISO 80601-2-69. The differences between the predicate device and subject device will not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device.
Note 3:
The "Alarm" is slightly different from the predicate device:
- a. Low Oxygen purity, Low & high pressure is same as the predicate device
- ﻒ Power loss alarm is meet the section 201.11.8.101.1 requirement of safety and performance ISO 80601-2-69.
- Although the predicate device does not have Oxygen Sensor failure, Flow rate less than 0.4L/Min and C. Display Circuit Board failure, which meet the section 201.13.2.101 Additional specific SINGLE FAULT CONDITIONS of ISO 80601-2-69.
So, the differences between the predicate device and subject device will not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device.
Note 4:
The "LCD display", "Accessories" and "Dimensions" of subject device is similar with predicate device, the differences between the predicate device and subject device will not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device.
Note 5:
The "Biocompatibility of materials contacting user" is slightly different from the predicate device, the device enclosure, LCD and button direct contact with intact surface skin the materials is ASB plastic, we have evaluated the ISO 10993-1:2018 standard, of which Article 5.2.2 talks about using conventional raw materials that can come into contact with a user's unqloved hands such as human interfaces for electronic equipment (e.g. computer keyboards, dials or buttons, touch screens, SD cards, ABS plastic has been widely used in medical equipment and other consumer products. The enclosure, LCD and buttons are transitory-contacting part as it's very short contact (maybe just 1 second pressing or several seconds unintentionally touching each time).
The ISO 10993-1:2018 shows that "Transitory-contacting medical devices with limited exposure (A) have very brief/transitory contact with the body (e.g. lancets, hypodermic needles, capillary tubes that are used for less than one minute). These generally would not require testing to address biocompatibility". So, I did think it is the materials in common use for other consumer products which no further biological evaluation is needed.
Note 6:
Although the intended patient population is described differently, the respiratory disease population of the predicate device covers the population of the subject device, the differences between the predicate device and subject device will not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device.
7. Test Summary
- 7.1 Non-Clinical Tests Performed
-
- Electrical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility Test
{8}------------------------------------------------
Electrical safety and EMC testing were conducted on the proposed device. The device was shown to comply with IEC 60601-1-2:2020 and IEC TR 60601-4-2:2016 for electromagnetic compatibility, IEC 60601-1:2020, IEC 60601-1-8:2012, IEC 60601-1-11:2020 and ISO 80601-2-69:2020 for electrical safety.
2) Biocompatibility Test
Biocompatibility testing was performed on the subject device components in accordance with FDA quidance document entitled "Use of international Standard ISO 18562-1. "Biocompatibility Evaluation of Breathing Gas Pathways in Healthcare Applications- Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process." The device was shown to comply with ISO 18562-2 and ISO 18562-3.
3) Software verification and validation
Software verification and validation testing were conducted, and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA'S Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices." The software for this device was considered as a "moderate" level concern, since a malfunction of, or a latent design flaw in, the Software Device leads to an erroneous diagnosis or a delay in delivery of appropriate medical care that would likely lead to Minor Injury.
4) Usability validation
Usability evaluation was conducted and documented according to the recognized consensus of IEC 62366-1 and IEC 60601-6. The result of the usability demonstrated all the users in testing did not show any critical errors and represented the performance of using can be smoother by extra practices without specific usability problems. The device has been found to be reasonably safe and effective for the intended users, uses and uses environments.
5) Cybersecurity
The subject device no external interfaces, according to FDA guidance "Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices", no need cybersecurity evaluation.
7.2 Summary of Clinical Performance
Clinical testing was not needed for this 510(k). The non-clinical performance testing described above is sufficient to support that the device can be used safely and effectively.
8. Date of the summary prepared: December 6. 2024
9. Final Conclusion
The subject device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the legally marketed predicated device K222920.
§ 868.5440 Portable oxygen generator.
(a)
Identification. A portable oxygen generator is a device that is intended to release oxygen for respiratory therapy by means of either a chemical reaction or physical means (e.g., a molecular sieve).(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).