K Number
K231999
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2023-09-07

(64 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
880.6850
Panel
HO
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Steriking® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek® are intended to provide health care workers with an effective method to enclose devices intended for sterilization in the STERRAD® Sterilizer Systems. The device is intended to allow sterilization of enclosed devices and to maintain sterility of the enclosed devices until used up to 1 years post sterilization. The products are for single use only. The Steriking® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek are intended for use in the following STERRAD® Sterilization Cycles:
NX Standard
NX Advanced
100NX Duo
100NX Flex
100NX Standard

Max weights:
NX Standard Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, .094 lbs. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 1.194 pounds.

NX Advanced Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, .096 lbs. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 1.224 pounds.

100NX Duo Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, .116 lbs. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 1.222 pounds.

100NX Flex Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, .202 lbs. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 1.220 pounds.

100NX Standard Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, .202 lbs. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 4.478 pounds.

Max Count of lumens:
1 lumen max for All cycles

Max ID of lumens:
NX Standard Cycle:
1 mm ID for all pouch sizes

NX Advanced Cycle:
2 mm ID for all pouch sizes

100NX Cycle:
1 mm ID for all pouch sizes

100NX Flex Cycle:
1 mm ID for all pouch sizes

100NX Standard Cycle:
2 mm ID for all pouch sizes

Max lumen lengths:
NX Standard Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, 125 mm. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 250 mm.

NX Advanced Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, 125 mm. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 250 mm.

100NX Duo Cycle:
850 mm for all pouch sizes

100NX Flex Cycle:
850 mm for all pouch sizes

100NX Standard Cycle:
For pouch sizes 90 x 200 mm, 90 x 250 mm, 130 x 270 mm, 130 x 380 mm, 125 mm. For pouch sizes 190 x 330 mm, 250 x 400 mm, 300 x 450 mm, 250 mm.

Pouch Sizes:
300 x 450 mm
250 x 400 mm
190 x 330 mm
130 x 380 mm
130 x 270 mm
90 x 250 mm
90 x 200 mm

Device Description

Steriking® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek® are intended to be used to contain medical devices to be terminally sterilized in the STERRAD® Sterilization System. The medical devices are inserted into the Pouch, sealed, and then sterilized in the STERRAD ® Sterilization System. Sterilization Cycles are noted below. After completion of the sterilization process, the Pouch maintains sterility of the enclosed medical devices until the seal is opened. These pouches are made from a plastic film and Tyvek that is heat-sealed on three sides. The fourth side is left opened and will be self-sealed when used.

Steriking® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek® are intended to allow sterilization of enclosed devices and to maintain sterility of the enclosed devices until used up to 1 year post sterilization. The products are for single use only.

The pouches are constructed from Tyvek®/plastic films. The self-sealed pouches are self sealed prior to processing in the STERRAD® Sterilization Systems.

Sterilization Systems:

STERRAD® Cycles:
NX Standard
NX Advanced
100NX Duo
100NX Flex
100NX Standard

AI/ML Overview

The document provided describes the Steriking® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek®, which are intended to enclose devices for sterilization in STERRAD® Sterilizer Systems and maintain their sterility for up to one year. This device is a sterilization wrap, regulated as Class II.

The study presented is a non-clinical performance study to demonstrate that the proposed device, a self-seal pouch, is as safe and effective as its predicate device, a heat-seal pouch, with an added adhesive strip for sealing.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study results based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Test CategoryTestAcceptance CriteriaReported Device PerformanceConclusion
Package Integrity, Pre-Sterilization Shelf LifeDye MigrationNo leaks detected after dye migrationAll self-seal pouches passed the dye penetration at time zeroPass
Package Integrity, Pre-Sterilization Shelf LifeTensileAll samples are > 1.5N/15mm per ASTM F88All samples are > 1.5N/15mm per ASTM F88Pass
Package Integrity, Post-SterilizationTensileAll samples are > 1.5N/15mm per ASTM F88All samples are > 1.5N/15mm per ASTM F88Pass
BiocompatibilityCytotoxicityNot greater than Grade 2 reactivity (mildly reactive)No reduction of cell growth and cell lysisPass
Package Integrity, Post-SterilizationMicrobial Aerosol ChallengeA sample which demonstrates that all items remain sterile following exposureEach pouch met the sterility maintenance requirement as there was no growth in any of the culture tubes containing the stainless-steel coupons at the end if the incubation period.Pass
Sterilization PenetrationSterilization PenetrationDemonstrating that a minimum of $1.0\times10^6$ Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores were killed in a half-cycle (6-log reduction) using a worst-case, end of shelf-life injection volumeNegative for growth following the minimum incubation period (for all STERRAD cycles: 100NX Standard, NX Standard, NX Advanced, 100NX Flex, 100NX Duo)Pass
Post Sterilization Shelf LifeMaintenance of SterilityNo growth after exposurePass. No growth following exposure (for 100NX Standard cycle, aged 365 days)Pass
Package Integrity, Post-SterilizationAccelerated AgingSeal maintains integrityPass. No suspect seals were observed, and the test samples remained intact. (for 100NX Standard cycle, aged 3 years accelerated aging)Pass
Package Integrity, Post-SterilizationTensile (after accelerated aging)All samples are > $1.5N/15mm$ per ASTM F88All samples are > $1.5N/15mm$ per ASTM F88 (for 100NX Standard cycle, aged 3 years accelerated aging)Pass

2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not explicitly state the specific numerical sample sizes ("N") for each test. Instead, it refers to "All self-seal pouches," "All samples," and "Each pouch." This implies that the tests were conducted on a sufficient number of samples according to the referenced standards (e.g., ASTM, AAMI, ISO), which typically specify minimum sample sizes.

The data provenance is not specified regarding country of origin. The study appears to be prospective as it's a performance study for a new iteration of a device (the addition of a self-sealing adhesive strip) on the market. The phrase "Studies on the self-seal pouch were performed concurrently to the heat-seal pouch studies" suggests newly generated data for the proposed device.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

This information is not provided in the document. The tests performed are primarily laboratory-based physical, chemical, and microbiological evaluations against established standards, rather than expert-based assessments of images or patient data. Therefore, the concept of "ground truth" derived from human experts in the context of diagnostic interpretation is not applicable here.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This is not applicable as the tests are analytical and objective measurements against defined standards, not subjective assessments requiring adjudication.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done

No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The device is a sterilization pouch and not a diagnostic imaging or AI-driven decision support tool that would typically involve human readers.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done

No, a standalone study in the context of an algorithm or AI is not applicable. The device is a physical product (sterilization pouch), and the performance assessments are for the device's physical and functional properties.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used for these performance tests is based on established industry standards and scientific principles as outlined in various ASTM, AAMI, and ISO documents (e.g., ASTM F1929 for dye migration, ASTM F88 for tensile strength, ISO 10993-5 for cytotoxicity, AAMI TIR12 for microbial aerosol challenge and sterilization penetration). For biological tests like sterility, the "ground truth" is determined by the absence or presence of microbial growth under specified conditions (e.g., kill of $1.0\times10^6$ Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores, no growth after exposure).

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

This is not applicable as there is no "training set" in the context of an AI/ML algorithm. The device is a physical product.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

This is not applicable as there is no "training set" for this type of device.

§ 880.6850 Sterilization wrap.

(a)
Identification. A sterilization wrap (pack, sterilization wrapper, bag, or accessories, is a device intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a health care provider. It is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical device and also to maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).