(384 days)
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is indicated for the correction of refractive ametropia (myopia or hyperopia) in aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes. The lens may be worn by person who exhibit astigmatism of 2.00 diopters or less that does not interfere with visual acuity.
The eye care practitioners may prescribe the contact lens for single use daily disposable. The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily disposable single use and should be discard after removal.
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is hydrophilic available with aspheric design manufactured by using Cast Molding method. The soft contact lens material, Otufilcon A, which is a random copolymer of silicone-containing monomers and hydrophilic monomers, and has 44% water by weight.
These lenses contain UV blocker, a benzotriazole UV absorbing monomer to block UV radiation. Thus, the lens helps protect against the transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye. The transmittance characteristics are less than 5 % in the UVB range of 280 nm to 315 nm and less than 50 % in the UVA range of 315 nm to 380 nm. The lenses are tinted from edge to edge for visibility purposes with the color additive.
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear helps protect against transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye.
The lenses are available as aspheric lenses. Each finished lens is supplied in a plastic blister container with a sterile isotonic phosphate buffered saline solution containing wetting agent.
This document describes the premarket notification for the "Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear".
1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
The document doesn't provide a specific table of acceptance criteria with corresponding performance metrics in a format directly mapping to typical AI/ML device evaluations (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through physiochemical properties, non-clinical tests, and a clinical study. The acceptance criteria for the clinical study are primarily related to non-inferiority in effectiveness and safety.
| Acceptance Criteria (Effectiveness) | Reported Device Performance (Effectiveness) |
|---|---|
| Corrected visual acuity of both eyes ≥ 1.0 with contact lens at 3-month (non-inferiority to control group) | The efficacy endpoints showed that the test group was non-inferior to the control group. The lenses in both groups were effective in vision correction and did not cause unwanted diopter changes in spherical or cylindrical power and corneal astigmatism. |
| Acceptance Criteria (Safety) | Reported Device Performance (Safety) |
| Incidence of adverse events not higher than in the control group | The incidence of adverse events was not higher than in the control group. |
| Ocular conditions remained normal at the end of the study | Ocular conditions remained normal at the end of the study. No unpredictable side effects were observed during the trial. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Sample Size (Clinical Study):
- Screened: 151 subjects
- Randomized and Enrolled: 144 subjects (73 in test group, 71 in control group)
- Completed the study: 139 subjects (70 in test group, 69 in control group)
- Data Provenance: The clinical study was conducted in Taiwan. It was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled clinical study.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
This information is not provided in the document. The study involves visual acuity measurements and ocular examinations, which would typically be performed by trained medical professionals (e.g., ophthalmologists, optometrists), but the number and qualifications of these individuals are not specified as "experts establishing ground truth" in the context of an AI/ML device. For contact lenses, "ground truth" would relate to objective measurements of visual acuity and ocular health assessments, not typically expert consensus on interpretations.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
This information is not explicitly provided. Clinical studies for contact lenses often involve masked evaluators, but a formal adjudication method like "2+1" for discrepancies is not mentioned.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
This was not a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study. This study is for a contact lens, which is a medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that assists human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
This was not a standalone performance study. Again, this document refers to a contact lens, not an AI/ML algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
For the clinical study, the ground truth for effectiveness was based on objective measurements of corrected visual acuity (≥ 1.0) with the contact lens. For safety, it was based on the incidence of adverse events and ocular health assessments. These are clinical outcomes and objective measurements.
8. The sample size for the training set:
This information is not applicable as this is not an AI/ML device and therefore does not have a "training set" in that context. The document refers to the manufacturing process and material characteristics, which are developed and tested, but not in the framework of machine learning training data.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
This information is not applicable as this is not an AI/ML device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
December 20, 2023
Yung Sheng Optical Co., Ltd. Wen-Han Chen RA Manager No. 8, Keya 2nd Road, Daya District Taichung City, 42881 Taiwan
Re: K223585
Trade/Device Name: Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.5925 Regulation Name: Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LPL, MVN Dated: November 17, 2023 Received: November 17, 2023
Dear Wen-Han Chen:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketingsafety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-devicereporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
J Angelo Green -S
J. Angelo Green, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT1A: Division of Ophthalmic Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K223585
Device Name
Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is indicated for the correction of refractive ametropia (myopia or hyperopia) in aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes. The lens may be worn by person who exhibit astigmatism of 2.00 diopters or less that does not interfere with visual acuity.
The eye care practitioners may prescribe the contact lens for single use daily disposable. The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily disposable single use and should be discard after removal.
| Type of Use ( Select one or both, as applicable ) |
|---|
| ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|---|---|
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff @fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
-
- Type of Submission: Traditional 510(k)
| 2. | Submitter: | Yung Sheng Optical Co., Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Address: | No.8, Keya 2nd Rd., Daya District, Taichung City42881, Taiwan | |
| Phone: | +886-4-25658384 Ext.3514 | |
| Fax: | +886-4-25658387 | |
| Contact: | James Chang | |
| Date prepared: | November 30, 2022 | |
| Establishment Registration Number: | 3004021238 |
3. Identification of the Device
| Proprietary/Trade name: | Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) SiliconeSoft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear |
|---|---|
| Common Name: | Contact Lens |
| Classification Name: | Lenses, Soft Contact, Daily Wear |
| Device Classification: | II |
| Regulation Number: | 886.5925 |
| Panel: | Ophthalmic |
| Product Code: | LPL for Lenses, Soft Contact, Daily WearMVN for Lens, Contact, (Disposable) |
4. Identification of the Predicate Device
| Predicate DeviceName: | Bausch + Lomb Ultra® (Samfilcon A) Contact Lens |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer: | Bausch & Lomb, Inc. |
| Product Code: | LPL for Lenses, Soft Contact, Daily WearMVN for Lens, Contact, (Disposable) |
| 510(k) Number: | K131208 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
5. Intended Use and Indications for Use of the subject device
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is indicated for the correction of refractive ametropia (myopia or hyperopia) in aphakic and not-aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes. The lens may be worn by person who exhibit astigmatism of 2.00 diopters or less that does not interfere with visual acuity.
The eye care professionals may prescribe the lens for single use daily disposable. The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is daily disposable single use and should be discarded after removal.
6. Device Description
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is hydrophilic available with aspheric design manufactured by using Cast Molding method. The soft contact lens material, Otufilcon A, which is a random copolymer of silicone-containing monomers and hydrophilic monomers, and has 44% water by weight.
These lenses contain UV blocker, a benzotriazole UV absorbing monomer to block UV radiation. Thus, the lens helps protect against the transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye. The transmittance characteristics are less than 5 % in the UVB range of 280 nm to 315 nm and less than 50 % in the UVA range of 315 nm to 380 nm. The lenses are tinted from edge to edge for visibility purposes with the color additive.
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear helps protect against transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye.
The lenses are available as aspheric lenses. Each finished lens is supplied in a plastic blister container with a sterile isotonic phosphate buffered saline solution containing wetting agent.
7. Characteristics of Substantial Equivalence
- Material and Process Comparison Table
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Subject Device | Predicate device | |
|---|---|---|
| Device Name | Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) SiliconeSoft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear | Bausch + Lomb Ultra®(Samfilcon A) Contact Lens |
| Manufacturer | Yung Sheng Optical Co., Itd | Bausch & Lomb, Inc. |
| 510(k) Number | This submission | K131208 |
| FDA Category | Group V | Group V |
| Product Code | LPL and MVN | LPL and MVN |
| Intended Use | The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is indicated for the correction of refractive ametropia (myopia or hyperopia) in aphakic and not-aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes. The lens may be worn by person who exhibit astigmatism of 2.00 diopters or less that does not interfere with visual acuity.The eye care professionals may prescribe the lens for single use daily disposable. The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is daily disposable single use and should be discarded after removal. | Bausch + Lomb Ultra® (Samfilcon A) Contact Lens are designed for the intended use to be worn, directly against the cornea and adjacent limb and sclera areas of the eyes to correct vision conditions. |
| MaterialUSAN Name | Otufilcon A | Samfilcon A |
| ManufacturingMethod | Cast Molded | Cast Molded |
| Sterilization | Moist Heat (Steam) in Validated Autoclave | Moist Heat (Steam) in ValidatedAutoclave |
| Packaging | Blister pack | Blister pack |
| Water Content | 44 % | 46 % |
| Tint | Reactive Blue 246 | Reactive Blue 246 |
| Packagingsolution | Sterile isotonic phosphate buffered salinecontaining wetting agents | Sterile borate buffered salinewith poloxamine solution |
● Technological Characteristics Comparison Table
| Subject Device | Predicate device | |
|---|---|---|
| Device Name | Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) SiliconeSoft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear | Bausch + Lomb Ultra®(Samfilcon A) Contact Lens |
| Base Curve | 7.50 ~ 9.00 mm | 7.80 ~ 9.50 mm |
| Diameter | 12.0 ~ 15.0 mm | 13.5 ~ 15.0 mm |
| Center Thickness | 0.04 ~ 0.14 mm | 0.05 ~ 0.50 mm |
| Refractive Index | $1.417 \pm 0.005$ nd | 1.411 nd |
| OxygenPermeability (Dk) | 120 x 10-11(cm2/sec)(ml O2/ml x mmHg) | 114 x 10-11(cm2/sec)(ml O2/ml x mmHg) |
| LightTransmittance | 95 % | 97.3 % |
| UV-A | < 50 % | Not Stated |
| UV-B | < 5 % | Not Stated |
| Powers | -20.00 ~ +20.00 D | -20.00 ~ +20.00 D |
{6}------------------------------------------------
8. Non-Clinical Testing
A series of preclinical testing were performed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear.
-
Physiochemical Studies
The physiochemical studies were conducted according to ISO 18369-4:2017 Ophthalmic Optics-Contact Lenses-Part 4: Physiochemical properties of contact lens materials and ISO 18369-3:2017 Ophthalmic Optic-Contact Lenses-Part 3: Measurement methods. The physical, optical and chemical properties of the lens are within established specifications for the lenses. The following tests were conducted as recommended by the FDA Premarket Notification 510(k) Guidance Document for Daily Wear Contact Lenses, 1994: -
1 Finished Lens Parameters
-
. Refractive Index
-
Light Transmittance
-
Water Content
-
. Extractables (Leachability)
-
. Oxygen Permeability
-
. Mechanical Properties Testing
-
Physical Compatibility Test with Packaging Solution
-
1 Shelf-life
-
Toxicology Studies
Toxicology studies reports show that the lenses are non-toxic and biocompatible with the ocular environment.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear
- Cytotoxicity Test (ISO 10993-5)
- Ocular Irritation Test (ISO 10993-10, ISO 9394)
- Acute Systemic Toxicity Test (ISO 10993-11)
- Skin Sensitization Test (ISO 10993-10)
Packaging Solution
- Cytotoxicity Test (ISO 10993-5) ●
- Ocular Irritation Test (ISO 10993-10)
- Acute Systemic Toxicity Test (ISO 10993-11)
PP blister and aluminum foil
- Cytotoxicity Test (ISO 10993-5)
- Ocular Irritation Test (ISO 10993-10)
- Acute Systemic Toxicity Test (ISO 10993-11)
The results of the non-clinical testing, including physiochemical studies and toxicology studies, demonstrated that Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear which met all the specifications and is concluded substantially equivalent to the safety and effectiveness of predicate device.
{8}------------------------------------------------
9. Summary of Clinical Study
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled clinical study with 3 months treatment follow-up was completed. The location of Clinical Study is in Taiwan, where is outside of United States only. The study screened 151 subjects and 7 subjects failed to be included. A total of 144 subjects were randomized and enrolled in this study (73 subjects wore the test lenses [test group] and 71 subjects wore control lenses "Bausch Lomb Ultra Contact Lens" [control group]. Of the 144 randomized subjects, 5 subjects (3 subjects in the test group and 2 subjects in the control group) were withdrawn and 139 subjects (70 subjects in the test group and 69 subjects in the control group) completed the study.
Regarding the primary efficacy endpoint, the effectiveness of corrected visual acuity is at 3-month. Effectiveness is defined as visual acuities of both eyes correctable to ≥ 1.0 with contact lens. Effectiveness formula (%) is total number of subjects with vision correction of ≥ 1.0 at a given timepoint / total number of subjects enrolled at a given time x 100%. Definition of total number of subjects enrolled at a given time is the total number of subjects conforming to the PPS criteria and having worn lenses for 3 months. Based on the test results, the efficacy endpoints showed that the test group was non-inferior to the control group. Moreover, the lenses in both groups were effective in vision correction and did not cause unwanted diopter changes in spherical or cylindrical power and corneal astigmatism.
In safety endpoints, the incidence of adverse events was not higher than in the control group and the ocular conditions remained normal at the end of the study. No unpredictable side effects were observed during the trial.
Therefore, this clinical investigation supports the claim of substantial equivalence between the two lens types with regard to clinical safety and effectiveness.
10. Conclusion
The Pure Plus UV Aspheric (Otufilcon A) Silicone Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lens for Daily Wear is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices,
{9}------------------------------------------------
Bausch + Lomb Ultra® (Samfilcon A) Contact Lens (510K number K131208) in term of optical property, physiochemical and pre-clinical toxicology. They are produced from the same material (Silicone marcomer), have the same functional and scientific technology, lens characteristics as well as the intended uses are identical. It is concluded that the lenses are as safe, as effective and perform as well as the both predicate devices.
§ 886.5925 Soft (hydrophilic) contact lens.
(a)
Identification. A soft (hydrophilic) contact lens is a device intended to be worn directly against the cornea and adjacent limbal and scleral areas of the eye to correct vision conditions or act as a therapeutic bandage. The device is made of various polymer materials the main polymer molecules of which absorb or attract a certain volume (percentage) of water.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II if the device is intended for daily wear only.(2) Class III if the device is intended for extended wear.
(c)
Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required. As of May 28, 1976, an approval under section 515 of the act is required before a device described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section may be commercially distributed. See § 886.3.