(298 days)
No
The description focuses on light-based sensing and visual feedback based on color changes, not AI/ML algorithms for analysis or prediction. There is no mention of training data, test data, or AI/ML specific performance metrics.
No.
The device is indicated for use during an invasive procedure (pedicle screw pilot hole drilling) to provide visual feedback to the surgeon, assisting in the prevention of soft tissue contact and vertebral cortex perforation. It is a tool for procedural guidance and aims to prevent harm during a medical procedure, rather than directly treating a disease or condition.
Yes
The device aids surgeons by providing visual feedback on tissue changes at the tip of the probe, indicating potential contact with soft tissues or vertebral cortex perforation during pedicle screw pilot hole drilling. This real-time feedback helps in diagnosing the tissue type and preventing errors.
No
The device description explicitly states it is comprised of a "single use, disposable device" which is a hardware component containing electronics, an LED, and fiber optics, in addition to the software application. The performance studies also include testing of hardware aspects like insertion force, torque, and electrical safety.
No, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections. They are used to provide information for diagnosis, monitoring, or screening.
- Waypoint GPS™ Function: The Waypoint GPS™ is a surgical guidance device used during a procedure (pedicle screw placement). It provides real-time visual feedback based on the color of the tissue at the tip of the probe. This feedback is used to help the surgeon avoid soft tissues and potential vertebral cortex perforation.
- No Sample Analysis: The device does not analyze a sample taken from the patient's body. It directly interacts with the tissue during the surgical procedure.
The Waypoint GPS™ is a surgical instrument with a guidance function, not a diagnostic test performed on a biological sample.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Waypoint GPS™ is indicated for use during pedicle screw pilot hole drilling to provide visual feedback to the surgeon of changes in color to the tissue at the tip of the probe that may indicate contact with soft tissues and possible vertebral cortex perforation. The Waypoint GPS™ is indicated for use in both open and percutaneous (MIS) procedures.
Product codes
QWP
Device Description
The Waypoint GPS™ is comprised of a single use, disposable device and a software application that is downloaded onto the provided tablet. The system is intended to surgeons during pilot hole drilling for pedicle screw placement. Waypoint GPS™ probe is single use disposable and consists of a handle containing electronics and a stainless-steel shaft with distal LED and fiber optics for visualizing the tissues immediately in contact with the distal end of the probe. The device produces visual signals to indicate changes in color associated with possible verforation. It uses light to provide visual alerts to indicate a change in anatomical structure to prevent placement in soft tissues or vertebral cortex perforation.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Spine
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Within a sterile field in an operating room
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies
Biocompatibility Testing: Passed. Non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, non-irritating, non-toxic, non-pyrogenic. Relevant for substantial equivalence as material differences do not raise new safety questions.
Insertion Force: Passed. Each shaft completed 15 insertions into Sawbones without mechanical failure, demonstrating it can reliably create multiple pilot holes.
Torque on the shaft: Passed. Each shaft withstood 15 torque cycles without mechanical failure, demonstrating it can reliably create multiple pilot holes.
Torque to failure testing: Passed. Each shaft withstood the target torque, indicating reliability for creating multiple pilot holes.
Simulated Use Testing: Passed. Each device successfully completed pairing with tablet, color calibration, color testing, and battery monitoring after stress testing, demonstrating reliable performance and communication.
Visualization and color: Passed. Each device successfully displayed correct colors and RGB values, demonstrating reliable color output.
Electrical Safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC): Passed. Compliance with IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2. Relevant due to electrical components in both subject and predicate devices.
Software Verification and Validation Testing: Passed. Conducted as per FDA guidance for moderate level of concern software. Relevant due to software in both subject and predicate devices.
Sterilization Validation: Passed. In accordance with ISO 11135-1:2014 using the Overkill test method. Relevant for terminally sterilized products.
Distribution and Aging: Passed. Devices and package system passed climactic conditioning, accelerated aging, and package performance testing. Insertion force, torque, simulated use, visualization, and color testing were performed on unaged and aged devices, confirming sterile barrier and device reliability over time.
Cadaver study: Passed. Multiple users successfully performed device setup, calibration, pilot hole creation, and interpretation of tablet display results in modified sawbone and cadavers, demonstrating user proficiency.
GLP Animal Study (In vivo performance testing): Users correctly identified GPS device tip location in all procedures (100%). Users successfully distinguished between cortical bone, cancellous bone, and a breach by the change in color and change in red, green, blue (RGB) values displayed on the table. Users correctly identified PediGuard tip location in most procedures (95%). Users were able to distinguish between cortical bone, cancellous bond, and breach by the change in cadence and pitch the predicate device emitted. The results demonstrated with statistical significance (0.050) that the subject device (WayPoint GPS System) is non-inferior to the predicate PediGuard device. The total number GPS procedures (including transverse processes) demonstrated the device performs as intended and users adequately interpret results with 95/95. This study provides in vivo objective evidence that the technical differences between the subject device and the predicate do not affect the intended use, and user interpretation of the subject device is equivalent to the predicate device.
Key Metrics
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 874.1820 Surgical nerve stimulator/locator.
(a)
Identification. A surgical nerve stimulator/locator is a device that is intended to provide electrical stimulation to the body to locate and identify nerves and to test their excitability.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, featuring a stylized depiction of human figures. To the right is the FDA logo, with the acronym "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in a larger, bolder font, and "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font below.
May 12, 2023
Waypoint Orthopedics, Inc. Tiffini Wittwer Regulatory Affairs 300 Applebrooke Drive Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
Re: K222106
Trade/Device Name: Waypoint Guided Pedicle System (GPS) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 874.1820 Regulation Name: Surgical Nerve Stimulator/Locator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QWP Dated: April 7, 2023 Received: April 12, 2023
Dear Tiffini Wittwer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
1
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely, Patrick Antkowiak -S Patrick Antkowiak
Acting Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K222106
Device Name Waypoint Guided Pedicle System (GPS)™
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Waypoint GPS™ is indicated for use during pedicle screw pilot hole drilling to provide visual feedback to the surgeon of changes in color to the tissue at the tip of the probe that may indicate contact with soft tissues and possible vertebral cortex perforation. The Waypoint GPS™ is indicated for use in both open and percutaneous (MIS) procedures.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
---|
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) Summary - K222106
SUBMITTER: I.
Company | Waypoint Orthopedics, Inc. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
300 Applebrooke Drive | ||||
Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||
Contact Person: | Tiffini Wittwer | |||
Regulatory Affairs Consultant | ||||
Phone: 707.799.6732 | ||||
E-mail: twittwer@mededge.io | ||||
Date Prepared: | April 7, 2023 | |||
II. DEVICE | ||||
Trade Name: | Waypoint Guided Pedicle System (GPS)™ | |||
Common Name: | Nerve Stimulator | |||
Classification Name: | Neurosurgical Nerve Stimulator / Locator (21 CFR 874.1820) | |||
Regulatory Class: | II | |||
Product Code: | OWP | |||
Item | Waypoint Guided | |||
Pedicle System™ | ||||
(Subject Device) | SpineGuard | |||
PediGuard With DSG | ||||
Connect Technology | ||||
(Predicate Device) | Comment | |||
510(k) | K222106 | K201454 | ||
Class | II | II | Same | |
Product Code | QWP | PDQ, ETN | Primary product code is the same | |
Indications | ||||
for Use (IFU) | The Waypoint GPS™ is | |||
indicated for use during | ||||
pedicle screw pilot hole | ||||
drilling to provide visual | ||||
feedback to the surgeon of | ||||
changes in color to the tissue | ||||
at the tip of the probe that may | ||||
indicate contact with soft | ||||
tissues and possible vertebral | ||||
cortex perforation. The | ||||
Waypoint GPS™ is indicated | ||||
for use in both open and | ||||
percutaneous (MIS) | ||||
procedures. | The PediGuard is indicated for | |||
use during pedicle screw pilot | ||||
hole drilling to provide | ||||
feedback to the surgeon via | ||||
visual and audible alerts that | ||||
indicate a change in impedance | ||||
at the tip of the probe and may | ||||
indicate contact of the tip with | ||||
soft tissues and possible | ||||
vertebral cortex perforation. | ||||
The PediGuard system is | ||||
indicated for use in both open | ||||
and percutaneous (MIS) | ||||
surgical approaches to the | ||||
spine. PediGuard is also | ||||
indicated for use with | ||||
fluoroscopic guidance in | ||||
percutaneous (MIS) surgical | ||||
approaches to the spine. | ||||
The PediGuard also is | ||||
specifically indicated for use in | ||||
intraoperative | ||||
electromyographic ("EMG") | ||||
surveillance to assist in the | ||||
location and evaluation of | ||||
spinal nerves during surgery of | ||||
the spine, by administration of | ||||
low voltage electrical energy to | ||||
tissues and nerves during | ||||
surgery of the spine, and EMG | ||||
monitoring of muscle groups | ||||
associated with those nerves. | Subject device has a narrower | |||
indication for use that the | ||||
predicate (does not include | ||||
fluoroscopic guidance or EMG | ||||
surveillance). Description of | ||||
output (color versus | ||||
impedance) does not change | ||||
the indication for use. User | ||||
validation testing demonstrates | ||||
this difference does not raise | ||||
new questions of safety of | ||||
effectiveness. | ||||
Item | Waypoint Guided | |||
Pedicle System™ | ||||
(Subject Device) | SpineGuard | |||
PediGuard With DSG | ||||
Connect Technology | ||||
(Predicate Device) | Comment | |||
Output | Visual | Visual and Auditory | User validation testing of the | |
subject device and side-by-side | ||||
animal testing of the subject | ||||
device and predicate device | ||||
demonstrates this difference | ||||
does not raise new questions of | ||||
safety of effectiveness. | ||||
Connection | Software application on tablet | |||
allows for visualization | Software application on tablet | |||
allows for visualization | Same | |||
Principles of | ||||
operation | Shaft serves as bone awl and | |||
provides visual feedback | ||||
indicating if device has | ||||
perforated vertebral cortex | Shaft serves as bone awl and | |||
nerve locator by providing | ||||
visual and auditory feedback | ||||
indicating if device has | ||||
perforated vertebral cortex | Pre-clinical performance testing of | |||
the subject device, and side-by-side | ||||
animal testing of the subject device | ||||
and predicate device demonstrates | ||||
that this difference does not raise | ||||
new questions of safety or | ||||
effectiveness. | ||||
Technical | ||||
Principles of | ||||
Operation | Spectral reflectance: the electro- | |||
optical property of a material to | ||||
reflect light. Photons of a specific | ||||
wavelength are reflected back to a | ||||
sensor. These wavelengths appear | ||||
on the display tablet as the color | ||||
information for the respective | ||||
tissue type. | ||||
● Cortical bone has lowest | ||||
absorbance => more | ||||
photons reflect back to | ||||
sensor => lighter color | ||||
● Cancellous bone has higher | ||||
absorbance of green / blue | ||||
& reflects red => red to | ||||
dark displayed | ||||
● Cortical breach (void) => | ||||
highest absorbance => lack | ||||
of light reflected back to | ||||
sensor => dark or black | ||||
color | Electrical conductivity: the | |||
property of a material to allow | ||||
current flow. Electrical | ||||
conductance between two | ||||
electrodes is measured as | ||||
current. Current is monitored | ||||
in feedback circuitry that | ||||
generates an output frequency | ||||
in an audible range. | ||||
● Cortical bone has low | ||||
conductivity => lower | ||||
current => low, slow signal | ||||
● Cancellous bone has | ||||
comparatively medium | ||||
conductivity => medium | ||||
signal | ||||
● Periosteum and blood have | ||||
high conductivity | ||||
(indicates cortical breach) | ||||
=> larger measurement to | ||||
convert => higher pitched, | ||||
faster sound | Pre-clinical animal testing, | |||
including side-by-side testing of the | ||||
subject device and the predicate | ||||
device demonstrate that the | ||||
technical difference does not raise | ||||
new questions of safety or | ||||
effectiveness. | ||||
Handle Shape | Gearshift Knob-Handle | Gearshift T-Handle | Same | |
Components | Single piece, Stainless Steel Shaft, | |||
plastic handle | Single piece, Stainless Steel Shaft, | |||
plastic handle, ceramic insulator | ||||
or modular with removable handle | Same external components. | |||
Performance bench testing | ||||
demonstrates differences in | ||||
internal components do not raise | ||||
new questions of safety of | ||||
effectiveness. | ||||
Item | Waypoint Guided | |||
Pedicle System™ | ||||
(Subject Device) | SpineGuard | |||
PediGuard With DSG | ||||
Connect Technology | Comment | |||
(Predicate Device) | ||||
Shaft / bone | ||||
awl material | 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Inner electrode: 316L Stainless | ||
Steel (ASTM F138) Outer | ||||
electrode and/or shaft: 304 | ||||
Stainless Steel (ASTM F899), | ||||
316L Stainless Steel and/or 17- | ||||
4PH (ASTM F899) | Biocompatibility testing and | |||
performance testing of the subject | ||||
device demonstrates material | ||||
differences do not raise | ||||
new questions of safety of | ||||
effectiveness. | ||||
Safety | ||||
Features | Device cannot be turned off until | |||
battery exhausted. Prevents reuse | ||||
of device. | Device cannot be turned off until | |||
battery exhausted. Prevents reuse | ||||
of device. | Same | |||
Internally | ||||
Powered | Lithium-Ion Battery | |||
Chemistry: Li/MnO2 | ||||
Max output current: 3.0mA | Lithium-Ion Battery | |||
Chemistry: Li/MnO2 | ||||
Max output current: 5.5mA | Same battery type; run time of | |||
subject device is lower than | ||||
predicate. Electrical safety and | ||||
performance testing demonstrates | ||||
difference does not | ||||
raise new questions of safety of | ||||
effectiveness. | ||||
Sterility | Sterile | Sterile | Same | |
Single Use or | ||||
Reusable | Single use | Single use | Same | |
Distal Shaft | ||||
Shape | Straight, cannulated | Curved or straight; or straight | ||
(cannulated) with removable inner | ||||
starter stylet (optional) and | ||||
sensory needle | Same as 1 predicate model | |||
Dimensions | Shaft Length: 200mm | |||
Diameter of cutting edge: 4.0mm | Shaft Lengths: 120mm & 160mm | |||
Outer Diameters: 4.0mm - 5.5mm | OD is within predicate range. | |||
Performance and cadaver testing of | ||||
the subject device demonstrates | ||||
difference does not raise new | ||||
questions of safety of effectiveness. | ||||
Circuit Board | Capacitors, Resistors and Diodes |
- Firmware (programmable chip)
on circuit board | Capacitors, Resistors and Diodes - Firmware (programmable chip)
on circuit board | Same | |
| Anatomical
Site | Spine | Spine | Same | |
| Where used | Within a sterile field in an
operating room | Within a sterile field in an
operating room | Same | |
III. PREDICATE DEVICE(S)
The subject device is equivalent to the following devices:
- K201454 DSG Connect Technology
IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
The Waypoint GPS™ is comprised of a single use, disposable device and a software application that is downloaded onto the provided tablet. The system is intended to surgeons during pilot hole drilling for pedicle screw placement. Waypoint GPS™ probe is single use disposable and consists of a handle containing electronics and a stainless-steel shaft with distal LED and fiber optics for visualizing the tissues immediately in contact with the distal end of the probe. The device produces visual signals to indicate changes in color associated with possible verforation. It uses light to provide visual alerts to indicate a change in anatomical structure to prevent placement in soft tissues or vertebral cortex perforation.
v. INDICATION FOR USE
The Waypoint GPS™ is indicated for use during pedicle screw pilot hole drilling to provide visual feedback to the surgeon of changes in color to the tissue at the tip of the probe that may indicate contact with soft tissues and possible vertebral cortex perforation. The Waypoint GPS™ is indicated for use in both open and percutaneous (MIS) procedures.
VI. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The subject Waypoint GPS™ system is similar to the predicate in several ways. Both devices provide real- time feedback to the surgeon during the preparation of the pedicle screw pilot holes, alerting the tip of the sensor senses a change in the surrounding tissues. The subject and predicate devices have the same
4
intended use and use environment with similar indication for use and user interface. Both the subject device and predicate are provided as sterile, battery operated, hand-held probes comprised of similar materials. Performance testing has demonstrated that the primary technical difference (use of electrical impedance verses spectral reflectance) raises no new issues of safety and effectiveness. Thus, the subject Waypoint GPS is substantially equivalent to the predicate PediGuard.
Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Review
5
6
VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
Table 2 below lists all of the testing that has been performed on the Waypoint GPS System.
Table 2: Performance Test Summary
7
Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
---|---|---|
Biocompatibility | ||
Testing | ||
Cytotoxicity Sensitization Intracutaneous | ||
Reactivity Acute Systemic | ||
Toxicity Material Mediated | ||
Pyrogenicity | FDA Guidance “Use of International Standard | |
ISO 10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical | ||
Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing and | ||
ISO 10993-1, Biological Evaluation of medical | ||
Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a | ||
risk management process. | ||
(ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10, 10993-11) | Passed. Non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, non- | |
irritating, non-toxic, non-pyrogenic. | ||
This test is relevant in determining | ||
substantial equivalence because it | ||
demonstrates any material differences | ||
between the subject device and the predicate | ||
do not raise new questions of safety. | ||
Insertion Force | Device shafts and finished devices were tested | |
to demonstrate that it can complete a minimum | ||
of 15 insertions into Sawbones at a specified | ||
depth without mechanical failure similar to a | ||
standard bone awl. | Passed. Each shaft was able to successfully | |
complete 15x insertions without mechanical | ||
failure. This test is relevant in determining | ||
substantial equivalence because it | ||
demonstrates the subject device can create | ||
multiple pilot holes during one clinical | ||
procedure and perform as a bone awl. | ||
Torque on the shaft | Device shafts and finished devices were | |
subjected to 15x torque on the shaft cycles. | ||
This was done to demonstrate that the device | ||
can ultimately function as a standard bone awl. | ||
Testing was performed with the tip of the shaft | ||
being at a specified depth in Sawbones and a | ||
torsion machine was used to apply force. Each | ||
device was tested repeatedly 15 times. | Passed. Each shaft was able to successfully | |
withstand 15x torque on a shaft cycle without | ||
mechanical failure. This test is relevant in | ||
determining substantial equivalence because | ||
it demonstrates the subject device can | ||
reliably create multiple pilot holes during | ||
one clinical procedure and perform as a bone | ||
awl. | ||
Torque on the shaft | Torque to failure testing was performed on | |
device shafts. This testing was performed by | ||
holding both ends of the device using vices and | ||
then rotating the proximal end using a torsion | ||
machine. | Passed. Each shaft was able to successfully | |
withstand the target torque. This test is | ||
relevant in determining substantial | ||
equivalence because it demonstrates the | ||
subject device shaft can reliably be used in | ||
creating multiple pilot holes during one | ||
clinical procedure as a bone awl. | ||
Simulated Use Testing | Complete devices were tested for pairing of | |
device with tablet, color calibration, color | ||
testing, and battery monitoring. Each device | ||
was tested 2 times before and after being | ||
subjected to Insertion Force and Torque on the | ||
shaft. | Passed. Each device was able to successfully | |
complete each of the procedure steps | ||
required for intended use. This test is | ||
relevant to determining substantial | ||
equivalence because it demonstrates that the | ||
WayPoint GPS System (device and tablet) | ||
reliably performs as intended under worst | ||
case conditions. The reliability of the device | ||
communication and pairing to the tablet | ||
supports substantial equivalence of the | ||
proposed device to the predicate device with | ||
tablet communication feature. | ||
Visualization and color | Complete devices were tested for visualization | |
and color. This testing included monitoring the | ||
tablet screen to see if RGB value and the color | ||
changed as probe contacts with different colors | ||
and recording RGB values for each color card | ||
used. | Passed. Each device was able to successfully | |
complete the test cycle and display correct | ||
colors and RGB values. This test is relevant | ||
in determining substantial equivalence | ||
because it demonstrates the device output | ||
(change in color) is reliably achieved, similar | ||
to the change in sound of the predicate | ||
device | ||
Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
Electrical Safety and | ||
electromagnetic | ||
compatibility (EMC) | Testing was conducted in compliance with the | |
IEC 60601-1 standard for safety and IEC | ||
60601-1-2 standard for EMC. | Passed. This test is relevant in determining | |
substantial equivalence because the subject | ||
device and predicate device both contain | ||
electrical components in their the device | ||
design. | ||
Software Verification | ||
and Validation Testing | Testing was conducted as recommended by | |
FDA's "Guidance for the Content of Premarket | ||
Submissions for Software Contained in | ||
Medical Devices." For moderate level of | ||
concern software | Passed. This test is relevant in determining | |
substantial equivalence because the subject | ||
device and predicate device both contain | ||
software in the device design. | ||
Sterilization Validation | Testing was conducted in accordance with ISO | |
11135-1:2014 - Sterilization of Healthcare | ||
Products – Ethylene Oxide: Requirements for | ||
development, validation, and routine control of | ||
a sterilization process for medical devices. The | ||
Overkill test method was used. | Passed. This test is relevant in determining | |
substantial equivalence because the subject | ||
device and predicate device are both | ||
terminally sterilized products. | ||
Distribution and Aging | Devices and the package system were subjected | |
to climactic conditioning, accelerated aging, | ||
and package performance testing as outlined in | ||
ASTM D4169-22 using Distribution Cycle 13. | ||
Individual pouches were then subjected to | ||
gross leak detection (bubble) per ASTM | ||
F2096-11, and seal strength (peel) testing per | ||
ASTM F88/F88M-21. | Passed. Insertion force, torque, simulated | |
use, visualization, and color testing were all | ||
performed on unaged and aged devices | ||
demonstrating sterile barrier packaging and | ||
device performance reliability over time. | ||
This test is relevant in determining | ||
substantial equivalence because both devices | ||
are terminally sterilized and required to | ||
reliably perform as intended through stated | ||
expiration date. | ||
Cadaver study | Multiple users performed device set up, | |
calibration, pilot hole creation, and | ||
interpretation of tablet display results per the | ||
Instructions for use. Each user performed the | ||
procedure in a modified sawbone that included | ||
different colors, and a cadaver. | Passed. This test is relevant to determining | |
substantial equivalence because it | ||
demonstrates users can perform the device | ||
procedure and correctly interpret the device | ||
output in the same procedure and intended | ||
use and the predicate. | ||
GLP Animal Study | In vivo performance testing. Multiple users | |
performed pilot hole procedures in ovine | ||
lumbar vertebrae using the GPS device and the | ||
predicate PediGuard device. Each pilot hole | ||
was planned for a specific depth (cortical bone, | ||
cancellous bone, or breach of cortical bone). | ||
Fluoroscopic CT was used to verify pilot hole | ||
depth, GPS, and PediGuard results. Additional | ||
procedures were performed in the transverse | ||
processes using GPS with direct visualization | ||
confirmation. Users reported the device tip | ||
location for both the subject device (color | ||
description) and predicate device (auditory | ||
description) locations. Data output was also | ||
recorded for each device procedure. The side- | ||
by-side comparison data was powered to |
90%. | Passed. Users correctly identified GPS
device tip location in all procedures (100%).
Users successfully distinguished between
cortical bone, cancellous bone, and a breach
by the change in color and change in red,
green, blue (RGB) values displayed on the
table.
Users correctly identified PediGuard tip
location in most procedures (95%). Users
were able to distinguish between cortical
bone, cancellous bond, and breach by the
change in cadence and pitch the predicate
device emitted.
The results demonstrated with statistical
significance (0.050) that the subject device
(WayPoint GPS System) is non-inferior to
the predicate PediGuard device.
The total number GPS procedures (including
transverse processes) demonstrated the
device performs as intended and users
adequately interpret results with 95/95. |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
| GLP Animal Study
(continued) | | This study is relevant in determining the
substantial equivalence of the subject device
because it provides in vivo objective
evidence that the technical differences
between the subject device and the predicate
do not affect the intended use. Further the
side-by-side in vivo testing demonstrates that
user interpretation of the subject device is
equivalent to the predicate device. |
8
9
CONCLUSIONS VIII.
Waypoint Orthopedics considers the Guided Pedicle System™ (GPS) to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device listed above. This conclusion is based upon the devices' similarities in intended use, indication for use, anatomical sites, principles of operation, and materials. As confirmed through bench testing the Waypoint GPS™ is as safe and effective for its intended purpose as the predicate device.