(219 days)
Not Found
No
The description explicitly states that a manual segmentation needs to be performed, and the planning involves the surgeon manually positioning implants. There is no mention of automated analysis, pattern recognition, or learning algorithms typically associated with AI/ML.
No
The device is described as an "information tool" for "preoperative surgical planning and visualization" and explicitly states it is "not for intraoperative or patient-specific surgical guidance." It does not directly treat or diagnose a medical condition.
No
The device is described as an "information tool to assist in the preoperative surgical planning and visualization" and "a preoperative standalone web-based medical software used for the planning of primary shoulder replacement." It does not make a diagnosis but rather aids in surgical planning.
Yes
The device is described as a "preoperative standalone web-based medical software" and the description focuses entirely on the software's functionality, data management, and planning interface. The performance studies mentioned are software verification and validation, further supporting its software-only nature.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is "to assist in the preoperative surgical planning and visualization of a primary total shoulder replacement." This is a surgical planning tool, not a diagnostic test performed on biological samples.
- Device Description: The description details a software for processing CT images, creating 3D bone models, positioning implants virtually, and generating a planning report for surgery. This is focused on surgical preparation and visualization.
- Input: The input is CT-scan images, which are medical images, not biological specimens.
- Function: The software's function is to aid in surgical planning and visualization, not to diagnose a disease or condition based on in vitro analysis of biological samples.
IVD devices are specifically designed to examine specimens derived from the human body (like blood, urine, tissue) to provide information for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of a disease or condition. This device does not perform such analysis.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
FX SPS is intended to be used as an information tool to assist in the preoperative surgical planning and visualization of a primary total shoulder replacement.
Product codes
LLZ
Device Description
FX SPS is a preoperative standalone web-based medical software used for the planning of primary shoulder replacement from CT-images. It comprises a secure database which enables the patient's cases management and the access to the planning interface.
Preliminary to the planning, a manual segmentation needs to be performed from the patient's CTimages. The segmentation process consists in building 3D bone models of the patient's shoulder and positioning anatomic landmarks on it. Once these data are generated, their compliance is checked. They are then imported into the FX SPS's database making the planning available for the surgeon.
The planning step involves virtually positioning of the shoulder prosthesis on the 3D reconstruction of the patient's shoulder. On that purpose, the surgeon chooses implants from a library of implants. Afterwards, he selects the size of the implant more suitable to the joint and he can move prosthesis components in all directions. Once the positioning of the implant is satisfying, he validates the planning to generate a planning report.
During surgery, he will have at its disposal the planning report comprising preoperative and planned parameters.
Mentions image processing
Yes
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
CT-images
Anatomical Site
Shoulder
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Surgeon, preoperative surgical planning
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies
- Software verification and validation testing were conducted as required by IEC 62304 and documentation was provided as recommended by the FDA Guidance "Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices". The FX SPS software was considered as a software with a "moderate" level of concern. All performance testing demonstrated that FX SPS performs according to its specifications and functions as intended.
- Concerning the angle or gap measurements, software verification and validation testing were conducted. All performance testing demonstrated that FX SPS performs according to its specifications and functions as intended to ensure the required angle accuracy of 1 degree and gap measurement accuracy of 1 mm.
- User needs validation The software was validated with intended users through a human factor test series to ensure the user needs and intended use requirements were met, in accordance with IEC 62366-1. All requirements were met and no new issues of safety or effectiveness were raised.
Key Metrics
Required angle accuracy of 1 degree and gap measurement accuracy of 1 mm.
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 892.2050 Medical image management and processing system.
(a)
Identification. A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: on the left, there is a symbol representing the Department of Health & Human Services, and on the right, there is the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue. The text is arranged in two lines, with "FDA" being larger and bolder than the rest of the text.
Pixee Medical % Agathe Joet Quality & Regulatory Affairs Engineer 18 rue Alain Savary Besancon, 25000 FRANCE
Re: K213922
July 22, 2022
Trade/Device Name: FX SPS Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Medical image management and processing system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LLZ Dated: June 15, 2022 Received: June 21, 2022
Dear Agathe Joet:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR
1
- for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jessica Lamb. Ph.D. Assistant Director Imaging Software Team DHT8B: Division of Radiological Imaging Devices and Electronic Products OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
510(k) Number (if known)
K213922
Device Name
FX SPS
Indications for Use (Describe)
FX SPS is intended to be used as an information tool to assist in the preoperative surgical planning and visualization of a primary total shoulder replacement.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
図 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
□ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (7/17)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
3
510(k) SUMMARY
Pixee Medical's FX SPS
510(k) Submitter:
Name: Pixee Medical Address: 18 rue Alain Savary 25000 Besançon FRANCE
Phone: (+33) 4 58 10 13 65 Fax: (+33) 4 58 10 14 51
Contact Person: Agathe JOËT
Date Prepared: July 20, 2022
Device:
Trade name: FX SPS Common name: Planning software for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Classification name: System, Image Processing, Radiological (21 CFR §892.2050) Product code: LLZ Regulatory class: II Classification Panel: Radiology
Predicate Device:
FX SPS is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed e-ortho Shoulder Software.
Applicant Name | Device Name | Product code | 510(k) number |
---|---|---|---|
FH INDUSTRIE | e-Ortho Shoulder Software | LLZ | K201928 |
No reference devices were used in this submission.
Device Description:
FX SPS is a preoperative standalone web-based medical software used for the planning of primary shoulder replacement from CT-images. It comprises a secure database which enables the patient's cases management and the access to the planning interface.
Preliminary to the planning, a manual segmentation needs to be performed from the patient's CTimages. The segmentation process consists in building 3D bone models of the patient's shoulder and positioning anatomic landmarks on it. Once these data are generated, their compliance is checked. They are then imported into the FX SPS's database making the planning available for the surgeon.
The planning step involves virtually positioning of the shoulder prosthesis on the 3D reconstruction of the patient's shoulder. On that purpose, the surgeon chooses implants from a library of implants.
4
Afterwards, he selects the size of the implant more suitable to the joint and he can move prosthesis components in all directions. Once the positioning of the implant is satisfying, he validates the planning to generate a planning report.
During surgery, he will have at its disposal the planning report comprising preoperative and planned parameters.
Intended use / Indications for Use:
FX SPS is intended to be used as an information tool to assist in the preoperative surgical planning and visualization of a primary total shoulder replacement.
Substantial equivalence:
Comparison of Intended Use / Indications for Use: .
FX SPS and the e-Ortho Shoulder Software are both web-based software indicated for primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Both devices are intended to be used as an information tool to assist in the preoperative surgical planning and visualization of a primary Total Shoulder Replacement. Thus, there is no difference between the subject device and the predicate device with respect to indications and intended use.
. Comparison of Operating principle
They both use CT-images of patients to reconstruct 3D models of the shoulder joint and to position anatomical landmarks through a manual segmentation process. In addition, they both allow the surgeons to perform a preoperative planning by enabling reverse and anatomical implant visualization and positioning within the specific patient's bone models. Furthermore, both devices compute and display pre-operative parameters. Both devices generate a downloadable planning report. Thus, FX SPS and E-ortho have the same principle of operation.
Comparison of technological characteristics with the predicate device: .
At a high level, the subject and predicate devices are based on the following same technological elements:
- . Both are web-based software used pre-operatively;
- . Both use CT-scan images;
- Both inteqrate anatomic and reverse shoulder implants; .
- Both rely on manual segmentation for 3D models reconstruction; .
- . Both function with user profiles determining the possible user's actions;
- Both manage the cases from a list of patients; .
- Both provide to the user a milling tool; .
5
-
Both integrate 3D and 2D representation of the humerus and the scapula. .
The following technological difference exists between the subject and predicate devices: -
E-ortho provides software prediction of optimal implant sizing while FX SPS does not. .
Discussion regarding the technological characteristics:
| Technological
characteristics | FX SPS (Device
subject of this
application) | E-Ortho Shoulder
Software K201928
(Predicate device) | Discussion |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Type of software | Web-based software | Web-based software | Identical |
| Use time | Pre-operatively | Pre-operatively | Identical |
| Imaging used | CT-scan images | CT-scan images | Identical |
| Type of implants
planned | Anatomical and
reverse shoulder
implants | Anatomical and
reverse shoulder
implants | Identical |
| Manual/automatic
segmentation | Manual
segmentation
performed. | Manual
segmentation
performed | Identical |
| User profiles | User profiles define
the authorized
actions for the user. | User profiles define
the authorized
actions for the user. | Identical |
| Case
management | List of cases | List of cases | Identical |
| Tools | Milling tool | Milling tool | Identical |
| Anatomy
representation | 3D and 2D
representation of the
humerus and the
scapula. | 3D and 2D
representation of the
humerus and the
scapula. | Identical |
| Recommandations | Does not include any
predictions and
recommendations. | Include software
prediction of optimal
implant sizing. | While the E-ortho software
includes prediction of optimal
implant sizing, FX SPS does
not. Yes, it makes FX SPS
less critical regarding to the
safety, as the surgeon's
planning is not influenced |
6
The minor difference in technological characteristics between the subject device and the predicate does not alter the intended use of the device and does not raise new questions of safety nor effectiveness.
Non-Clinical Performance Data:
The following testing was conducted to evaluate the device:
- . Software verification and validation testing were conducted as required by IEC 62304 and documentation was provided as recommended by the FDA Guidance "Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices". The FX SPS software was considered as a software with a "moderate" level of concern. All performance testing demonstrated that FX SPS performs according to its specifications and functions as intended.
- Concerning the angle or gap measurements, software verification and validation testing . were conducted. All performance testing demonstrated that FX SPS performs according to its specifications and functions as intended to ensure the required angle accuracy of 1 degree and gap measurement accuracy of 1 mm.
- User needs validation The software was validated with intended users through a human . factor test series to ensure the user needs and intended use requirements were met, in accordance with IEC 62366-1. All requirements were met and no new issues of safety or effectiveness were raised.
Therefore, the nonclinical tests demonstrate that the device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the predicate device.
Conclusion:
FX SPS has the same intended use, indications and principle of operation as its predicate device, as well as similar technological characteristics. The minor differences in technological characteristics do not alter the intended use of the device and do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness, and performance data demonstrated that FX SPS is as safe and effective as the E-ortho shoulder software. Thus, the FX SPS software is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device.