(28 days)
The Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead is a single-use, sterile medical device accessory intended to be used with Checkpoint Stimulators to provide electrical stimulation of exposed motor nerves or muscle tissue to identify nerves and to test nerve and muscle excitability.
The Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Leads are single-patient disposable accessories for providing stimulus to a targeted nerve. The accessories are intended for use with any device from the Checkpoint Stimulator/Locator Family. The lead electrode is intended to wrap around nerves that have been surgically exposed, allowing the surgeons to provide hands free stimulus to a targeted nerve.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead, a medical device accessory. The submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving a specific performance level of the new device itself through a diagnostic study with acceptance criteria.
Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets these criteria in the context of diagnostic performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) is not available from this document. The document primarily details nonclinical testing to ensure the device's safety and functionality are equivalent to the predicate.
Here's an analysis based on the information provided, recognizing that it doesn't fit the typical diagnostic device evaluation framework:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not present acceptance criteria in terms of diagnostic performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy) for the Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead. Instead, testing focused on engineering, safety, and compatibility standards. The "performance" is reported as meeting these standards.
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Criteria (Implied from standards/testing) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Functional/Electrical | Meet Checkpoint's mechanical & electrical specifications | All requirements met |
| Maintain electrical stimulation parameters/waveform (IEC 60601-2-10:2012+A1:2016 compliant) | Compliant | |
| Electrical Safety/EMC | Meet IEC 60601-1:2005 +A12013, IEC 60601-1-2:2014 standards | Meets system electrical design specifications and statutory regulations when used in conjunction with associated accessories |
| Biocompatibility | Conform to limits of BS EN ISO 10993-1:2018 (limited exposure) | All endpoints conforming to limits of BS EN ISO 10993-1:2018 and 2016 FDA guidance, and relevant biocompatibility endpoints met for wire/connector |
| Robustness/Design | Correct implementation of design intent and device robustness | Design Analysis and Evaluation Testing evaluated, ensuring correct implementation and robustness |
| Sterilization/Shelf Life | Maintain sterility via validated ETO cycle, achieve 2-year shelf life | Supplied Sterile via SAME validated and monitored ETO cycle; 2 Years Shelf Life |
| Packaging | Maintain integrity and functionality (same as stimulator) | Adopted into the same sterilization cycle as the stimulator; same sterile barrier system, sales, and shipping packaging used |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The document refers to "a battery of bench and user tests" and "Design Verification Testing (DVT)" but does not specify the sample size (e.g., number of leads tested) for these tests. Data provenance, such as country of origin or whether it was retrospective/prospective, is not mentioned. It is implied these were internal, prospective engineering tests.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This is not applicable as the study was not a diagnostic study requiring expert ground truth for interpretation. The "ground truth" here would be established by validated engineering specifications and international standards, and results would be interpreted by qualified engineers and compliance personnel.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable, as this was not a diagnostic study involving human interpretation needing adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is an accessory for intraoperative nerve stimulation, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is a physical medical device accessory, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The "ground truth" for the nonclinical testing described was adherence to established industry standards (e.g., IEC 60601 series for electrical safety, ISO 10993 series for biocompatibility), internal design specifications, and functional performance requirements.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model, so there is no training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" stacked on top of the word "ADMINISTRATION".
August 26, 2021
Checkpoint Surgical Ben Cottrill Product Development Manager 6050 Oak Tree Blvd., Suite 360 Independence. Ohio 44131
Re: K212355
Trade/Device Name: Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead, Medium, Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead, Large Regulation Number: 21 CFR 874.1820 Regulation Name: Surgical Nerve Stimulator/Locator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PDQ, ETN Dated: July 28, 2021 Received: July 29, 2021
Dear Ben Cottrill:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpm/pmn.cfm identifies.combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (0S) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE(@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shu-Chen Peng, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT1C: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K212355
Device Name Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead is a single-use, sterile medical device accessory intended to be used with Checkpoint Stimulators to provide electrical stimulation of exposed motor nerves or muscle tissue to identify nerves and to test nerve and muscle excitability.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Special 510(k) Summary
Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead
In accordance with Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 807, and in particular 21 CFR §807.92, the following summary of information is provided:
1 Applicant Checkpoint Surgical 6050 Oak Tree Blvd., Suite 360 Independence, OH 44131 Contact Person: Ben Cottrill New Product Development Manager 2 Date Prepared 28/JUL/2021 చి Name of Device
| Device Trade Name: | Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead |
|---|---|
| Device Common Name: | Intraoperative Lead |
| Class:Regulation Description: | Class IISurgical nerve stimulator/locator (874.1820) |
| Classification Name: | Neurosurgical Nerve LocatorStimulator, Nerve |
| Product Code: | PDQETN |
| Classification Panel: | NeurologyEar Nose & Throat |
| Predicate Device |
| Manufacturer | Trade Name | Product Code | Submission # |
|---|---|---|---|
| Checkpoint Surgical | Checkpoint | ETN | K092292 |
5 Description of Device
4
The Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Leads are single-patient disposable accessories for providing stimulus to a targeted nerve. The accessories are intended for use with any device from the Checkpoint Stimulator/Locator Family. The lead electrode is intended to wrap around nerves that have been surgically exposed, allowing the surgeons to provide hands free stimulus to a targeted nerve.
Model Numbers include:
{4}------------------------------------------------
- REF 9525 Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead, Medium (7mm nominal diameter) .
- REF 9526 Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead, Large (10mm nominal diameter) .
6 Indications for Use
The Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Lead is a single-use, sterile medical device accessory intended for use in conjunction with a Checkpoint Stimulator to provide electrical stimulation of exposed motor nerves or muscle tissue to locate and identify nerves and to test nerve and muscle excitability.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Predicate Devices (K092292) | Guardian Intraoperative Lead | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indicationsfor Use | The Checkpoint® is a single-usedevice intended to provide electricalstimulation of exposed motor nervesor muscle tissue to locate andidentify nerves and to test nerve andmuscle excitability. | The Checkpoint GuardianIntraoperative Lead is a single-use,sterile medical device accessoryintended to be used withCheckpoint Stimulators to provideelectrical stimulation of exposedmotor nerves or muscle tissue tolocate and identify nerves and totest nerve and muscle excitability. | Same |
| StimulationElectricalParametersandWaveform | Charge balanced cathodic-firstbiphasic current-controlled waveformcompliant with IEC 60601 2-10:2012+A1:2016. | Charge balanced cathodic-firstbiphasic current-controlledwaveform compliant with IEC 606012-10:2012+A1:2016. | Same |
| StimulationElectrodeMaterial | 304 Stainless Steel | 304 Stainless Steel | Same |
| StimulationElectrode | Probe | Button contact | SE |
| ChargeDensity(µC/cm² ) | Maximum of 12.7 µC/cm² throughminimum contact surface area. | Maximum of 10.5 µC/cm² throughminimum contact surface area. | SE |
| InsulatingMaterialat/aroundelectrodecontact | Medical grade polyolefin, MT2000 | Pellethane 2363-80A TPU (athermoplastic polyurethaneelastomer), used extensively forboth cardiac and deep brainstimulation leads. | SE |
| Sterilization | Supplied Sterile via validated andmonitored ETO cycle | Supplied Sterile via SAME validatedand monitored ETO cycle | Same |
| Shelf Life | 2 Years | 2 Years | Same |
| PackagingConfig. &Materials | Stimulator with protective probesleeve in sterile single use Tyvekpouch and paperboard shelf carton. | Lead on HDPE backer card, insame packaging parts with sameprocesses as stimulator. | SE |
Summary Comparison of Technological Characteristics to Predicate 7
{6}------------------------------------------------
8 Nonclinical Testing
The Guardian Leads underwent a battery of bench and user tests in accordance with in-house procedures. Design Verification Testing (DVT) conducted on the lead to support this submission demonstrated that all requirements were met including Checkpoint's mechanical and electrical specifications, as well as functionality / performance requirements.
Electrical Safety, general functional testing, and Electromagnetic Immunity / Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI / EMC) testing for the Checkpoint Stimulator-Locator family was configured and executed in a worst-case configuration to ensure that the stimulation system meets system electrical design specifications and statutory requlations when used in conjunction with associated accessories, including the proposed lead.
Biocompatibility testing was performed on the lead, with all endpoints conforming to limits of BS EN ISO 10993-1:2018 and 2016 FDA guidance titled 'Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" for its intended use as a limited exposure (<24 hours) externally communicating tissue contacting device Incremental testing on the wire and connector of the subject device was also provided by its manufacturer and certified to have met all relevant biocompatibility endpoints.
Design Analysis and Evaluation Testing evaluated device robustness and correct implementation of the design intent.
A Packaging Assessment was performed to support a determination of substantial equivalence. The same sterile barrier system, sales, and shipping packaging as well as the same labeling stock and inks as the Checkpoint Stimulator Family are used for the proposed lead. The lead was adopted into the same sterilization cycle as the stimulator as per
Electrical Safety Standards applicable to the proposed lead:
- IEC 60601-1:2005 +A12013, Medical electrical equipment Part 1: General requirements for ● basic safety and essential performance
- IEC 60601-1-2:2014, Medical electrical equipment Part 1-2: General requirements for . safety - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - requirements and tests
- . IEC 60601-2-10:2012+A1:2016, Medical Electrical Equipment- Part 2.10: Particular Requirements for Safety and Essential Performance of Nerve & Muscle Stimulators
Standards used to perform Biocompatibility Testing:
- . EN ISO 10993-1:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
- EN ISO 10993-5:2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: Tests for in vitro . cvtotoxicity
- . BS EN ISO 10993-7:2008, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals
- . EN ISO 10993-10:2013, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization
- BS EN ISO 10993-11:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices Tests for systemic . toxicitv
Results of this testing provide reasonable assurance that the proposed device design meets the
{7}------------------------------------------------
performance requirements and performs as intended.
9 Conclusions
The Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Leads have the same indication for use and share similar technological characteristics with their predicate devices, for which they are accessories. Any technological differences between the predicate device (K092292) and the Checkpoint Guardian Intraoperative Leads have been analyzed in terms of risks and addressed through performance testing which demonstrates that the Intraoperative Lead meets its intended use. There are no new concerns around safety or effectiveness. Thus, the leads have been shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
§ 874.1820 Surgical nerve stimulator/locator.
(a)
Identification. A surgical nerve stimulator/locator is a device that is intended to provide electrical stimulation to the body to locate and identify nerves and to test their excitability.(b)
Classification. Class II.