K Number
K203375
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2021-06-24

(220 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3660
Panel
OR
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The OVOMotion Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty System is intended for primary total shoulder replacement in a reverse shoulder configuration. The device is indicated for a patient with painful, disabling joint disease of the shoulder resulting from degenerative arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. The humeral head and glenoid vault should be of sufficient bone stock to support loading. The patient's joint must have gross rotator cuff deficiency, a functional deltoid muscle and be anatomically suited to receive the selected implants.

Glenoid Baseplate components are intended for cementless use with the addition of screw fixation. The Humeral Stem components are intended for both cemented and cementless use.

Device Description

The OVOMotion Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty System (RSA) is a system of components intended for total shoulder replacement in a reverse shoulder configuration. The humeral side of the system is comprised of a humeral cup and humeral insert which are attached to the Arthrosurface TSA Humeral Stem using an adapter ring. The glenosphere is implanted with the GlenoidBaseplate onto the glenoid side of the joint fixated with locking Center and Peripheral Screws.

AI/ML Overview

This document describes the OVOMotion Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty System and its equivalence to a predicate device. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets said criteria in the format requested. The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence through mechanical and wear testing against established ASTM standards and comparing technological characteristics with a predicate device.

Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria, reported device performance, sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, number or qualifications of experts, adjudication methods, details of MRMC studies, standalone performance details, type of ground truth used, or training set information.

The document states:

  • "No animal or clinical tests were conducted to establish equivalence."
  • The performance data provided are primarily mechanical and wear tests against ASTM standards. These tests establish equivalence to a predicate device rather than meeting specific performance acceptance criteria for a novel device.

§ 888.3660 Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.

(a)
Identification. A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”