(176 days)
Not Found
No
The summary describes a multi-function diagnostic device based on established optical and measurement principles (Shack-Hartmann, Placido disk, Scheimpflug, air puff tonometer, fundus camera). It mentions automation of alignment, focusing, and image capture, but there is no mention of AI, ML, deep learning, or any related concepts in the device description, intended use, or performance studies. The focus is on the integration of different measurement modalities and automation of standard procedures.
No
The device is described as a "multi-function diagnostic device" intended for measuring and imaging various parts of the eye to aid in evaluation and diagnosis, not to provide therapy.
Yes
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states, "The VX650 is a multi-function diagnostic device..."
No
The device description clearly outlines multiple hardware components including a wavefront aberrometer, corneal topographer, retro-illuminator, tonometer, pachymeter, and fundus camera, all integrated into a single platform. The performance studies also include hardware-specific testing like electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility.
Based on the provided information, the VX650 is not an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) device.
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are devices intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body (such as blood, urine, tissue) to obtain information for diagnostic purposes.
- VX650 Function: The VX650 is a multi-function diagnostic device that performs measurements and imaging directly on the living eye. It uses various optical and physical principles (wavefront aberometry, topography, Scheimpflug imaging, tonometry, retro-illumination, fundus photography) to assess the structure and function of the eye.
- No Specimen Collection: The description does not mention the collection or analysis of any biological specimens from the patient. All measurements and imaging are performed non-invasively on the eye itself.
Therefore, the VX650 falls under the category of in vivo diagnostic devices rather than in vitro diagnostic devices.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The VX650 is a multi-function diagnostic device combining wavefront aberometer, corneal topographer, retro-illuminator, tonometer and pachymeter, indicated for:
- Measuring the refraction of the eye giving both lower and higher order aberrations
- Measuring the shape of the cornea
- Retro-illumination imaging of the eye
- Measuring the intraocular pressure without contacting the eye for glaucoma evaluation
- Photographing the eye and taking images of the eye to evaluate the thickness of the central cornea
- Full cornea thickness map
- Scheimpflug imaging
- Anterior chamber imaging
- Pupil Image
- Image of the cornea relative to the iris
- Automatic eye-fundus camera intended for taking digital images of a human retina without the use of a mydriatic agent
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
HKX, HKI, MXK
Device Description
The VX650 is based on the VX130 (already cleared 510(k), number K162067) which is a combined wavefront aberrometer, corneal topographer, Scheimpflug pachymeter, non-contact tonometer and cataract screening device in a single platform that contains five different measurement units. The VX650 also contains a non-mydriatic fundus camera for retinal photography. The wavefront aberrometer uses the Shack-Hartmann principle and is used as an advanced autorefractometer that measures both lower and higher order aberrations of the refraction of the eye.
The corneal topographer uses a Placido disk to measure keratometry and the detailed shape of the cornea. The Scheimpflug pachymeter measures the thickness of the central cornea by illuminating it with a slit of light and photographing it using the Scheimpflug technique, there is also a scanning mode that allows measurement of the whole corneal surface and can provide detailed tomography maps of both corneal surfaces and the corneal thickness.
An air puff non-contact tonometer is included for measurement of the intraocular pressure and retro illumination is present for cataract screening.
The fundus camera contains an infra-red LED for alignment and focusing and a white LED flash for the photography to give colour images. The fundus image covers an angle of 45° on the retina so a regular image will contain both the macula and the optic nerve. The fundus camera also has a seven-position fixation target to increase the field of view as the patient can fixate in different directions.
The device is fully automated and a number of different measurements can be performed by a single command including alignment and focusing. The fundus imaging function is also fully automatic including automatic alignment, focusing and image capture.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Wavefront aberrometer, corneal topographer, retro-illuminator, Scheimpflug, fundus camera (digital images).
Anatomical Site
Eye, cornea, retina
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Bench tests were conducted to support substantial equivalence.
The tests performed include:
- Ophthalmic Testing per ISO 15004-1, and ISO15004-2
- Ophthalmic Testing about Fundus Cameras per ISO 10940 Ophthalmic Instruments --Fundus Cameras
- Software Verification and Validation per AAMI/ANSI/IEC 62304. The software of this device was considered as a "Moderate" level of concern.
- Electrical Safety Testing per IEC60601-1 and Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing per IEC60601-1-2.
The collective performance testing demonstrates that the VX650 device does not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness when compared to the predicate devices. The results of the performance testing demonstrate that the VX650 device performs as intended and does not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 886.1120 Ophthalmic camera.
(a)
Identification. An ophthalmic camera is an AC-powered device intended to take photographs of the eye and the surrounding area.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a photorefractor or a general-use ophthalmic camera, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" stacked on top of the word "ADMINISTRATION".
January 29, 2021
Luneau Technology Operations Yossi Constantinis Group Regulatory Affairs & Ouality Manager 2 rue Roger Bonnet Pont-de-l'Arche, Rouen 27340 France
Re: K202221
Trade/Device Name: VX650 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.1930 Regulation Name: Tonometer and Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HKX, HKI, MXK Dated: December 21, 2020 Received: December 28, 2020
Dear Yossi Constantinis:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
1
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Elvin Ng Assistant Director DHT1A: Division of Ophthalmic Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K202221
Device Name VX650
Indications for Use (Describe)
The VX650 is a multi-function diagnostic device combining wavefront aberometer, corneal topographer, retro-illuminator, tonometer and pachymeter, indicated for:
- · Measuring the refraction of the eye giving both lower and higher order aberrations
- · Measuring the shape of the cornea
- · Retro-illumination imaging of the eye
- Measuring the intraocular pressure without contacting the eye for glaucoma evaluation
- · Photographing the eye and taking images of the eye to evaluate the thickness of the central cornea
- Full cornea thickness map
- · Scheimpflug imaging
- · Anterior chamber imaging
- · Pupil Image
- · Image of the cornea relative to the iris
- · Automatic eye-fundus camera intended for taking digital images of a human retina without the use of a mydriatio agent
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
---|---|
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Company Name: | Luneau Technology Operations |
---|---|
Address | 2 rue Roger Bonnet, |
27340 Pont-de-l'Arche - France | |
Phone: | +33232989132 |
Primary contact | |
Person: | Yossi Constantinis |
Group Regulatory Affairs | |
Email y.constantinis@luneautech.com | |
Phone: +972 546 535 299 | |
Second contact | |
Person: | Haggai Herman |
General Manager | |
Email: h.herman@luneautech.com | |
Address: | 2 rue Roger Bonnet, |
27340 Pont-de-l'Arche | |
France | |
Date Prepared: | August 3rd, 2020 |
DEVICE IDENTIFICATION:
Trade Name: | VX650 |
---|---|
Generic Device Name: | Tonometer, Ac-Powered |
Review Panel: | Ophthalmic |
Classification: | Class II |
Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 886.1930 |
Product Code: | HKX |
4
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Luneau Technology. The logo consists of a gray circle with a blue and red stripe across it, followed by the text "Luneau Technology" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the text, there are three smaller logos: VISIOONIX, briot, and WECO.
Subsequent product codes, based on other device functions in Class II:
HKI Camera, Ophthalmic, Ac-Powered
MXK Device, Analysis, Anterior Segment
Device Description:
The VX650 is based on the VX130 (already cleared 510(k), number K162067) which is a combined wavefront aberrometer, corneal topographer, Scheimpflug pachymeter, non-contact tonometer and cataract screening device in a single platform that contains five different measurement units. The VX650 also contains a non-mydriatic fundus camera for retinal photography. The wavefront aberrometer uses the Shack-Hartmann principle and is used as an advanced autorefractometer that measures both lower and higher order aberrations of the refraction of the eye.
The corneal topographer uses a Placido disk to measure keratometry and the detailed shape of the cornea. The Scheimpflug pachymeter measures the thickness of the central cornea by illuminating it with a slit of light and photographing it using the Scheimpflug technique, there is also a scanning mode that allows measurement of the whole corneal surface and can provide detailed tomography maps of both corneal surfaces and the corneal thickness.
An air puff non-contact tonometer is included for measurement of the intraocular pressure and retro illumination is present for cataract screening.
The fundus camera contains an infra-red LED for alignment and focusing and a white LED flash for the photography to give colour images. The fundus image covers an angle of 45° on the retina so a regular image will contain both the macula and the optic nerve. The fundus camera also has a seven-position fixation target to increase the field of view as the patient can fixate in different directions.
The device is fully automated and a number of different measurements can be performed by a sinqle command including alignment and focusing. The fundus imaging function is also fully automatic including automatic alignment, focusing and image capture.
5
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Luneau Technology. The logo consists of a gray circle with a blue, white, and red stripe across it, followed by the words "Luneau Technology" in bold, black font. Below that, in a smaller font, are the words "VISIXONIX briot WECO".
Indications For Use:
The VX650 is a multi-function diagnostic device combining wavefront aberometer, corneal topographer, retro-illuminator, tonometer and pachymeter, indicated for:
- Measuring the refraction of the eye giving both lower and higher order aberrations
- Measuring the shape of the cornea
- Retro-illumination imaging of the eye
- Measuring the intraocular pressure without contacting the eye for glaucoma evaluation
- Photographing the eye and taking images of the eye to evaluate the thickness of the central cornea
- · Full cornea thickness map
- · Scheimpflug imaging
- · Anterior chamber imaging
- · Pupil Image
- Image of the cornea relative to the iris
• Automatic eye-fundus camera intended for taking digital images of a human retina without the use of a mydriatic agent
6
Identification of predicate devices:
The subject device is substantially equivalent to the following:
| Primary
predicate
Device | 510(k)
Holder | 510(k) no. | Date
cleared |
|--------------------------------|------------------|------------|-----------------|
| VX130 | Luneau | K162067 | 24 April 2017 |
The primary predicate refers to the one with indications for use and technological characteristics most similar to the subject device.
| Additional
predicate
devices related
to fundus
camera module | 510(k)
Holder | 510(k) no. | Date
cleared |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--------------------|
| Nexy | Next Sight | K180306 | 8 June 2018 |
| CenterVue Digital
Retinography
System DRS | CenterVue | K101935 | 27 October
2010 |
7
Bench tests
As the predicate device VX130 (K162067), VX650 device complies with the following standards:
- ISO 14971 Third Edtion 2019-12 ●
- AAMI ANSI ES60601- 1:2005/(R)2012 And A1:2012 ●
- IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.0 2014-02 ●
- ISO 15004-1 First edition 2006-06-01 ●
- ISO 10940 Second edition 2009-08-01 ●
- IEC 62471 First edition 2006-07 ●
- IEC 60825-1 Edition 2.0 2007-03
- ISO 10993-1 Fourth edition 2009-10-15
- IEC 62366-1 Edition 1.0 2015-02 ●
- IEC 60601-1-6 Edition 3.1 2013-10 .
- IEC 62304 Edition 1.1 2015-06
- ANSI Z80.36-2016 American National Standard for Ophthalmics Light Hazard ● Protection for Ophthalmic Instruments
VX650 device complies also with the following standards:
- ISO 8612:2009 Ophthalmic instruments Tonometers .
- ISO 10342:2010 Ophthalmic instruments Eye refractometers ●
- ISO 10343:2014 Ophthalmic instruments Ophthalmometers ●
- ISO 19980:2012 Ophthalmic instruments Corneal topographers ●
- ISO 24157:2008Ophthalmic optics and instruments - Reporting aberrations of the human eye
8
Predicate Device comparison
Table 1 provides a comparison between the subject device and the primary predicate device.
Table 1 - Predicate device comparison table with primary predicate device | ||
---|---|---|
ATTRIBUTE / | ||
CHARACTERISTICS | VX650 | |
Subject Device | VX130 | |
PD1 | ||
Device Name | VX650 | VX130 |
Comparison: Not Applicable | ||
Device Manufacturer | Luneau | Luneau |
Comparison: The device manufacturer is the same. | ||
FDA Product Code | HKX | |
(main and primary code) | HKX | |
Comparison: Predicate device PD1 has the same FDA product code as subject device. | ||
510k reference | K202221 | K162067 |
Comparison: Not Applicable | ||
FDA Classification Name | Tonometer, Ac-Powered | |
(for the main and primary code) | Tonometer, Ac-Powered | |
Comparison: Predicate device PD1 has the same FDA Classification name of submitted product. | ||
Classification | II | II |
Comparison: Predicate device PD1 has the same FDA Classification as subject device. | ||
FDA Regulation | ||
Number | 886.1930 | |
(according to main code) | 886.1930 | |
Comparison: Predicate device PD1 has the same regulation number of subject device. |
9
10
=
Table 1 - Predicate device comparison table with primary predicate device | ||
---|---|---|
ATTRIBUTE / | ||
CHARACTERISTICS | VX650 | |
Subject Device | VX130 | |
PD1 | ||
including fundus non-mydriatic camera | ||
Comparison: Predicate device PD1 is a combination instrument including multi-function. | ||
The subject device is a combination instrument including also (as an addition of predicate device PD1) a non-mydriatic fundus camera. | ||
Treatable areas | Eyes | Eyes |
Comparison: Predicate device PD1 has the same treatable areas as subject device. | ||
Alignment and | ||
examination | Automatic - the device | |
automatically aligns to the | ||
center of the pupil prior to | ||
autofocusing and capture. | Automatic - the device | |
automatically aligns to the | ||
center of the pupil prior to | ||
autofocusing and capture. | ||
Comparison: Predicate device PD1 has the same alignment and examination procedure as the subject device. | ||
General Functionalities | The general functionalities of VX650 are: | |
Wavefront Keratometry Retro illumination Corneal topography Tonometry Pachymetry (single slit) Pachymetry (multi slit) Fundus photography | The general functionalities of VX130 are: | |
Wavefront Keratometry Retro illumination Corneal topography Tonometry Pachymetry (single slit) Pachymetry (multi slit) | ||
Comparison: | ||
The subjected device has in addition the fundus photography, all the other functions are the same of predicate device PD1. | ||
Performance Standard | ||
Compliance | Complies with the following standards: | |
IEC 60601-1:2005 IEC 60601-1-2:2014 ISO 10940-2:2009 ISO 60825-1:2014 ISO 62471-1:2006 ISO 8612:2010 ISO 10342:2010 ISO 24157:2008 ISO 19980:2012 ISO 10343-1:2014 ISO 15004-2 2007 ISO15004-1:2006 ISO 14971: 2012 ISO 62366:2007 ISO 62304: 2006 | Complies with the following standards: | |
IEC 60601-1:2005 IEC 60601-1-2:2014 ISO 60825-1:2014 ISO 62471-1:2006 ISO 8612:2010 ISO 10342:2010 ISO 24157:2008 ISO 19980:2012 ISO 10343-1:2014 ISO 15004-2 2007 ISO15004-1:2006 ISO 14971: 2012 ISO 62366:2007 ISO 62304: 2006 |
11
Image /page/11/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Luneau Technology. The logo consists of a gray sphere with a blue and red stripe across it, followed by the text "Luneau Technology" in a sans-serif font. Below the text is the text "VISIONIX briot WECO" in a smaller font.
Table 1 - Predicate device comparison table with primary predicate device | ||
---|---|---|
ATTRIBUTE / | ||
CHARACTERISTICS | VX650 | |
Subject Device | VX130 | |
PD1 | ||
Comparison: | ||
Subject device and predicate device PD1 comply with relevant standards, except for | ||
ISO 10940-2:2009 that is applied specifically to VX650 since it includes fundus | ||
camera module. |
Table 2 provides a comparison between the subject device additional predicate devices related to fundus camera module.
Table 2 - Additional predicate devices related to fundus camera module | |||
---|---|---|---|
ATTRIBUTE / | |||
CHARACTERISTICS | VX650 | ||
Subject Device | Nexy | ||
Predicate Device PD2 | Digital Retinography | ||
System DRS | |||
Predicate Device PD3 | |||
Device Name | VX650 | Nexy | Digital Retinography |
System DRS | |||
Comparison: Not Applicable | |||
Device | |||
Manufacturer | Luneau | Next Sight srl | CenterVue |
Comparison: Not Applicable | |||
FDA Product Code | HKX (main code); | ||
subsequent codes for | |||
class II functions are | |||
HKI and MXK | HKI | HKI | |
Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have product code identical to one of subsequent | |||
code of subject device. | |||
510k reference | K202221 | K180306 | K101935 |
Comparison: Not Applicable | |||
FDA Classification | |||
Name | Tonometer, Ac-Powered | ||
(for the main code); |
for the subsequent
codes:
HKI Camera,
Ophthalmic, Ac-Powered
MXK Device, Analysis,
Anterior Segment | Camera, Ophthalmic,
Ac-Powered | Camera, Ophthalmic,
Ac-Powered |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have the same FDA Classification name, that is the
same of one of the subsequent codes of the subject device (VX650). | | | |
| Classification | II | II | II |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have the same FDA Classification as subject
device. | | | |
| Type of device | Combination instument | Fundus non-mydriatic | Fundus non-mydriatic |
| ATTRIBUTE / CHARACTERISTICS | VX650 Subject Device | Nexy Predicate Device PD2 | Digital Retinography System DRS Predicate Device PD3 |
| | including fundus non-mydriatic camera | camera | camera |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 are non-mydriatic fundus cameras. The subject device is a combination instrument including a non-mydriatic fundus camera module. | | | |
| Treatable areas | Eyes | Eyes | Eyes |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have the same treatable areas as subject device | | | |
| Alignment and examination | Automatic - the device automatically aligns to the center of the pupil prior to autofocusing and capture. | Automatic - the device automatically aligns to the center of the pupil prior to autofocusing and capture. | Automatic - the DRS device automatically aligns to the center of the pupil prior to autofocusing and capture. |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have the same alignment and examination procedure as the subject device. | | | |
| Field of horizontal vision | 45° | 45° | 45° |
| Field of vertical vision | 45° | 45° | 40° |
| Comparison:
Field of view represents the portion of the field of vision of the retina that can be framed with the device. The predicate device PD2 has the same field of view as the subject device. The field of horizontal vision of the predicate device PD3 is the same as the subject device but the vertical field is 5° smaller.
Regarding the field of vertical vision, a difference of 5º degrees does not bring a point of non-substantial equivalence between the VX650 device and a predicate device, as it does not influence the intended use, the performance, the safety and effectiveness of the system. | | | |
| Minimum pupil size | 3.5mm | 3.8mm | 4mm |
| Comparison:
The minimum pupil size parameter represents the size of the smallest pupil that can be measured. Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have slightly larger minimum pupil sizes than the subject device. It does not bring a point of non-substantial equivalence between the submitted device and the predicate devices, as it does not influence the intended use, the performance, the safety and effectiveness of the system. | | | |
| Image sensor | CMOS | CMOS | CMOS |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have the same image sensor type as the subject device. | | | |
| Sensor size | 6 M pixel | 2.1 M pixel | 5 M pixel |
| Comparison:
Predicate device PD3 has a similar sensor resolution as the subject device. The sensor resolution of the predicate device PD2 is smaller than the subject device, the subject device therefore is slightly better. | | | |
| Table 2 - Additional predicate devices related to fundus camera module | | | |
| ATTRIBUTE /
CHARACTERISTICS | VX650
Subject Device | Nexy
Predicate Device PD2 | Digital Retinography
System DRS
Predicate Device PD3 |
| retina | | | |
| Comparison: The subject device has better fundus resolution than the predicate devices. | | | |
| Light source | LEDs | LEDs | LEDs |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD12 and PD3 have the same light source as subject device. | | | |
| Type of fixation
light | Blue and continuous
(during the exam time) | Green and continuous
(during the exam time) | Green and continuous
(during the exam time) |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have the same type of fixation light as the subject
device. The colour does not make any significant difference. | | | |
| Focus on the
retina - type of
light | IR (infrared) LEDs and
continuous source
(during the focusing
time) | IR (infrared) LEDs and
continuous source
(during the focusing
time) | IR (infrared) LEDs and
continuous source
(during the focusing
time) |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 use infrared LEDs to perform the focus on the
retina, similar to the subject device. | | | |
| Type of flash | White LEDs in the visible
range and pulsed
(duration less than
50ms) with annular
shape on the cornea. | White LEDs in the
visible range and
pulsed (duration less
than 50ms) with
annular shape on the
cornea. | White LEDs in the visible
range and pulsed
(duration less than
50ms) with annular
shape on the cornea. |
| Comparison: Both predicate devices PD2 and PD3 have a similar flash to the subject device (color,
technology, shape on the cornea type of light to illuminate the retina). | | | |
| Performance
Standard
Compliance | Complies with the
following standards:
• IEC 60601-1:2005
• IEC 60601-1-2:2014
• ISO 10940-2:2009
• ISO 60825-1:2014
• ISO 62471-1:2006
• ISO 8612:2010
• ISO 10342:2010
• ISO 24157:2008
• ISO 19980:2012
• ISO 10343-1:2014
• ISO 15004-2 2007
• ISO15004-1:2006
• ISO 14971: 2012
• ISO 62366:2007
• ISO 62304: 2006 | Complies with the
following standards:
• IEC 60601-
1:2005
• IEC 60601-1-
2:2007
• ISO 10940-
2:2009
• ISO 15004-2
2007
• ISO 15004-
1:2006
• ISO 14971:
2012
• ISO
62366:2007
• ISO 62304:
2006 | Complies with the
following standards:
• IEC 60601-
1:2005
• IEC 60601-1-
2:2007
• ISO 10940-
2:2009
• ISO 15004-2
2007 |
| Comparison: | | | |
| Table 2 - Additional predicate devices related to fundus camera module | | | |
| ATTRIBUTE /
CHARACTERISTICS | VX650
Subject Device | Nexy
Predicate Device PD2 | Digital Retinography
System DRS
Predicate Device PD3 |
| Subject device and predicate devices PD2 and PD3 comply with relevant standards; the subject
device includes also the applicability of additional standards for the other functions, as described
above on Table 1. | | | |
12
Image /page/12/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Luneau Technology. The logo consists of a gray sphere with blue, white, and red stripes, followed by the text "Luneau Technology" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the text, there are three smaller words: "VISIONIX", "briot", and "WECO".
13
Image /page/13/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Luneau Technology. The logo consists of a gray sphere with blue, white, and red stripes, followed by the text "Luneau Technology" in black. Below the text, there are three smaller logos: VISIONIX, briot, and WECO.
14
Image /page/14/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo for Luneau Technology. The logo consists of a gray circle with a blue and red stripe across it. To the right of the circle is the text "Luneau Technology" in a sans-serif font. Below that is the text "VISIONIX briot WECO" in a smaller font.
TESTING IN SUPPORT OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
All necessary bench testing was conducted on VX650 to support a determination of substantial equivalence to the primary predicate device and to additional predicate device for fundus camera module. The tests performed include also:
- Ophthalmic Testing per ISO 15004-1, and ISO15004-2 ●
- Ophthalmic Testing about Fundus Cameras per ISO 10940 Ophthalmic Instruments --Fundus Cameras
- Software Verification and Validation per AAMI/ANSI/IEC 62304 The software of this . device was considered as a "Moderate" level of concern based on the FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" issued on: May 11, 2005
- Electrical Safety Testing per IEC60601-1 and Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing per . IEC60601-1-2.
The collective performance testing demonstrates that the VX650 device does not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness when compared to the predicate devices. The results of the performance testing demonstrate that the VX650 device performs as intended and does not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness.
Conclusion
None of the differences highlighted in the Table 1 and 2 introduce new issues of safety and effectiveness compared to predicate devices.
The remaining technical aspects (fundus camera module) of the VX650 compared with the additional predicate devices are considered very similar.
Based on the information contained in this submission, it is concluded that the VX650 device is substantially equivalent to the identified primary predicate device already in commerce within the USA and that any differences that do exist have no effect on the safety and effectiveness of the device.