(195 days)
No
The summary explicitly states that the device "does not use artificial intelligence or machine learning."
No.
The device is for viewing and quantifying 3D image data for measuring abdominal aortic aneurysms, which falls under diagnostic imaging rather than therapy.
Yes
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" states that the device is "designed to view and quantify 3D image data acquired by Philips diagnostic ultrasound systems for use in measuring the anterior diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysms." The "Device Description" also notes that it is "designed for structural measurements of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurism (AAA), including volume measurement and diameter measurements" to "assist in monitoring a previously diagnosed Abdominal Aortic Aneurisms." These functions directly support the diagnosis and monitoring of medical conditions.
Yes
The device is explicitly described as a "software application" and "software only" within the document. While it processes data from a Philips ultrasound system, the device itself is the software component for viewing and quantifying that data.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are medical devices used to perform tests on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to provide information about a person's health.
- Device Function: The AAA Model software application processes image data acquired directly from a Philips diagnostic ultrasound system. It does not analyze biological samples taken from the patient.
- Intended Use: The intended use is to view and quantify 3D image data for measuring the anterior diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This is an imaging-based measurement, not a diagnostic test performed on a biological sample.
The device is a software tool that assists healthcare professionals in interpreting and quantifying medical images, which falls under the category of medical imaging software, not In Vitro Diagnostics.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The AAA Model is a software application designed to view and quantify 3D image data acquired by Philips diagnostic ultrasound systems for use in measuring the anterior-posterior diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Optionally, lateral diameter, maximum diameter, and partial volume of an abdominal aortic aneurysm can also be provided. It is intended to be used by trained and qualified healthcare professionals in clinics, hospitals, and clinical point-of-care facilities.
Product codes
LLZ
Device Description
AAA Model for QLAB Advanced Quantification Software is a software application designed for structural measurements of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurism (AAA), including volume measurement and diameter measurements. AAA Model is designed to assist in monitoring a previously diagnosed Abdominal Aortic Aneurisms in two ways:
-
- to follow the anteroposterior (AP) maximum diameter for a Native AAA, and
-
- to follow the anteroposterior (AP) maximum diameter for a post-surgical AAA.
AAA model is not a computer-assisted detection (CADe) device, and does not use artificial intelligence or machine learning.
Philips QLAB Advanced Quantification Software (QLAB) is designed to view and quantify image data acquired on Philips ultrasound systems. QLAB is available either as a stand-alone product that can function on a standard PC, a dedicated workstation, and on-board Philips' ultrasound systems. AAA Model is compatible with the Philips EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System.
Mentions image processing
Yes
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
No
Input Imaging Modality
3D image data acquired by Philips diagnostic ultrasound systems
Anatomical Site
abdominal aortic aneurysms
Indicated Patient Age Range
patients age > 18 years old
Intended User / Care Setting
trained and qualified healthcare professionals in clinics, hospitals, and clinical point-of-care facilities.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Native AAA clinical evaluation:
Sample: 129 Native AAA datasets were gathered from one hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. 91 of the exams met the inclusion criteria. All patients age> 18 years old.
Test Method: Native AAA ultrasound images were acquired during normal ultrasound examination in hospital. AP diameter from 2D ultrasound measurement, and from 3D ultrasound measurement with AAA model are compared.
Post -EVAR AAA clinical evaluation:
Sample: 77 Post-EVAR AAA datasets were gathered from one hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. 45 of the exams met the inclusion criteria. All patients age> 18 years old.
Test Method: Post-EVAR AAA ultrasound images were acquired during normal ultrasound examination in hospital. AP diameter from 2D ultrasound measurement, and from 3D ultrasound measurement with AAA model are compared.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Bench testing:
Study type: Measurement Accuracy Verification
Sample size: 7 samples were used for each measurement (AP/LAT/MAD diameter and partial volume).
Key results: All measurements met the acceptance criteria (± 9% accuracy for volume measurement and ± 5% for all diameter measurements, with 90% confidence interval).
Clinical testing:
Study type: Native AAA clinical evaluation
Sample size: 129 Native AAA datasets, 91 met inclusion criteria.
Key results: Result met the target successful rate (At least 80% of all cases in which Philips AAA Model provides maximum AP diameter results that match standard of care measurements to within ± 10%).
Study type: Post -EVAR AAA clinical evaluation
Sample size: 77 Post-EVAR AAA datasets, 45 met inclusion criteria.
Key results: Result met the target successful rate (At least 80% of all cases in which Philips AAA Model provides maximum AP diameter results that match standard of care measurements to within ± 10%).
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 892.2050 Medical image management and processing system.
(a)
Identification. A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
0
September 20, 2020
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size below that.
Philips Ultrasound, Inc. % Hebe Sun Regulatory Affairs Manager 22100 Bothell Everett Highway BOTHELL WA 98021
Re: K200603
Trade/Device Name: AAA Model Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Picture archiving and communications system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LLZ Dated: August 12, 2020 Received: August 17, 2020
Dear Hebe Sun:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see
1
https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For
Thalia T. Mills, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K200603
Device Name AAA Model
Indications for Use (Describe)
The AAA Model is a software application designed to view and quantify 3D image data acquired by Philips diagnostic ultrasound systems for use in measuring the anterior diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Optionally, lateral diameter, maximum diameter, and partial volume of an abdominal aortic aneurysm can also be provided. It is intended to be used by trained and qualified healthcare professionals in clinical point-of-care facilities.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
---|---|
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) Summary
4
THIS SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS INFORMATION
IS SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 21CFR § 807.92
1. Submitter's name, address, telephone number, contact person.
Philips Ultrasound, Inc. 22100 Bothell Everett Hwy Bothell, WA 98021-8431
Contact: | Hebe Sun |
---|---|
Title: | Sr. Regulatory Affairs Manager |
Email: | hebe.sun@philips.com |
Tel: | 425-219-1223 |
Fax: | 425-487-8666 |
Date prepared: | Aug 11, 2020 |
-
- Name of the device, including the trade or proprietary name if applicable, the common or usual name, and the classification name, if known.
Common name: Picture archiving and communications system
- Name of the device, including the trade or proprietary name if applicable, the common or usual name, and the classification name, if known.
Proprietary name: AAA Model
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050
Classification name: System, Image Processing, Radiological
Product code: LLZ,
Class II Classification:
3. Indications for Use
The AAA Model is a software application designed to view and quantify 3D image data acquired by Philips diagnostic ultrasound systems for use in measuring the anterior-posterior diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Optionally, lateral diameter, maximum diameter, and partial volume of an abdominal aortic aneurysm can also be provided. It is intended to be used by trained and qualified healthcare professionals in clinics, hospitals, and clinical point-of-care facilities.
Device Description 4.
5
AAA Model for QLAB Advanced Quantification Software is a software application designed for structural measurements of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurism (AAA), including volume measurement and diameter measurements. AAA Model is designed to assist in monitoring a previously diagnosed Abdominal Aortic Aneurisms in two ways:
-
- to follow the anteroposterior (AP) maximum diameter for a Native AAA, and
-
- to follow the anteroposterior (AP) maximum diameter for a post-surgical AAA.
AAA model is not a computer-assisted detection (CADe) device, and does not use artificial intelligence or machine learning.
Philips QLAB Advanced Quantification Software (QLAB) is designed to view and quantify image data acquired on Philips ultrasound systems. QLAB is available either as a stand-alone product that can function on a standard PC, a dedicated workstation, and on-board Philips' ultrasound systems. AAA Model is compatible with the Philips EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System.
5. Substantially Equivalent Devices
Primary Predicate Device | |
---|---|
GI-3DQ in QLAB Advanced Quantification Software | K200974 |
Reference Device | |
VPO in QLAB Advanced Quantification Software | K121223 |
A comparison of technical characteristics for subject device and the currently marketed predicate device is provided on the following table.
6
Traditional 510(k)
AAA Model K200603
Comparison of Technical Characteristics
Primary Predicate | Reference Device | Subject Device | Explanation of Differences | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trade Name | QLAB System | QLAB System | QLAB System | N/A | ||
Feature | GI-3DQ | VPQ | AAA Model | N/A | ||
510(k) number | K200974 | K121223 | K200603 | N/A | ||
Product Code | QIH | LLZ | LLZ | Identical | ||
Regulation | ||||||
Number and | ||||||
Regulation | ||||||
Name | 21 CFR 892.2050; | |||||
System, Image processing, | ||||||
Radiological | ||||||
Picture Archiving and | ||||||
Communications System | ||||||
(PACS) | 21 CFR 892.2050; | |||||
System, Image | ||||||
processing, Radiological | ||||||
Picture Archiving and | ||||||
Communications System | ||||||
(PACS) | 21 CFR 892.2050; | |||||
System, Image | ||||||
processing, Radiological | ||||||
Picture Archiving and | ||||||
Communications System | ||||||
(PACS) | Identical | |||||
Indication for | ||||||
Use | Philips QLAB | |||||
Quantification software | ||||||
application package is | ||||||
designed to view and | ||||||
quantify image data | ||||||
acquired on Philips | ||||||
ultrasound products | Philips QLAB | |||||
Quantification | ||||||
software | ||||||
application package is | ||||||
designed to view and | ||||||
quantify image data | ||||||
acquired on Philips | ||||||
ultrasound products. | ||||||
The Vascular Plaque | ||||||
Quantification (VPQ) | ||||||
plug-in provides | ||||||
protocol driven tools | Philips QLAB | |||||
Quantification | ||||||
software | ||||||
application package is | ||||||
designed to view and | ||||||
quantify image data | ||||||
acquired on Philips | ||||||
ultrasound products. | ||||||
The AAA Model is a | ||||||
software application | ||||||
designed to view and | ||||||
quantify 3D image data | The primary predicate GI- | |||||
3DQ in QLAB is intended to | ||||||
be used for computing 3D | ||||||
measurements for any | ||||||
regions of interest, which can | ||||||
be used in the situation of | ||||||
abdominal aortic aneurysm. | ||||||
The subject device, AAA | ||||||
model application in QLAB, | ||||||
is designed to measure | ||||||
diameter of a previously | ||||||
detected abdominal aortic | ||||||
aneurysm. | ||||||
Primary Predicate | Reference Device | Subject Device | Explanation of Differences | |||
Trade Name | QLAB System | QLAB System | QLAB System | N/A | ||
Feature | GI-3DQ | VPQ | AAA Model | N/A | ||
510(k) number | K200974 | K121223 | K200603 | N/A | ||
for performing a semi- | ||||||
automated analysis of | ||||||
plaques in the carotid | ||||||
artery. | acquired by Philips EPIQ | |||||
Diagnostic ultrasound | ||||||
systems for use in | ||||||
measuring Anterio- | ||||||
posterior diameter. | ||||||
Optionally, Lateral | ||||||
diameter, Maximum | ||||||
diameter, and partial | ||||||
volume of the | ||||||
Abdominal Aorta | ||||||
Aneurysm can also be | ||||||
provided. It is intended | ||||||
to be used by trained and | ||||||
qualified healthcare | ||||||
professionals in clinics, | ||||||
hospitals, and clinical | ||||||
point-of-care facilities. | ||||||
Primary Predicate | Reference Device | Subject Device | Explanation of Differences | |||
Trade Name | QLAB System | QLAB System | QLAB System | N/A | ||
Feature | GI-3DQ | VPQ | AAA Model | N/A | ||
510(k) number | K200974 | K121223 | K200603 | N/A | ||
Application | ||||||
description | GI-3DQ computes linear | |||||
measurements, area | ||||||
measurements, stacked | ||||||
contour volume | ||||||
measurements, and | ||||||
ellipsoid volume | ||||||
measurements, of any | ||||||
regions of interest that | ||||||
users select. | VPQ provides semi- | |||||
automatic analysis of | ||||||
plaque in the carotid | ||||||
artery. it calculates | ||||||
plaque and lumen areas, | ||||||
and also the percent | ||||||
reduction for each | ||||||
tracked frame. | AAA generates semi- | |||||
automatic structural | ||||||
measurements of | ||||||
abdominal aortic | ||||||
aneurysm, including | ||||||
volume and diameter | ||||||
measurements. | Predicate GI-3DQ is for | |||||
general imaging analysis of | ||||||
any regions of interest, while | ||||||
subject device AAA is | ||||||
specifically designed for | ||||||
abdominal aortic aneurysm | ||||||
analysis. The impact of the | ||||||
difference in clinical | ||||||
application on device safety | ||||||
and effectiveness is | ||||||
addressed by the clinical | ||||||
performance study. | ||||||
Contour | ||||||
Generation | Borders are created | |||||
manually to create a 3D | ||||||
model. | Preliminary borders and | |||||
3D model are created | ||||||
automatically without | ||||||
user interaction. | ||||||
User is required to edit, | ||||||
accept or reject the | ||||||
contours. | Preliminary borders and | |||||
3D model are created | ||||||
automatically without | ||||||
user interaction. | ||||||
User is required to edit, | ||||||
accept or reject the | ||||||
contours prior to 3D | ||||||
volume and diameter | ||||||
measurements. | Subject device AAA semi- | |||||
automated border detection | ||||||
function is equivalent to | ||||||
VPQ. User is required to | ||||||
accept border prior to | ||||||
calculation for all apps. | ||||||
Primary Predicate | Reference Device | Subject Device | Explanation of Differences | |||
Trade Name | QLAB System | QLAB System | QLAB System | N/A | ||
Feature | GI-3DQ | VPQ | AAA Model | N/A | ||
510(k) number | K200974 | K121223 | K200603 | N/A | ||
Quantification | ||||||
Technology | Manual border tracing | |||||
over multiple slices; | ||||||
Creates 3D mesh to derive | ||||||
volume measurement; | ||||||
diameter measurement | ||||||
done via manual distance | ||||||
measurement tool | Automated preliminary | |||||
border detection; | ||||||
Creates 3D mesh to | ||||||
derive volume | ||||||
measurement; diameter | ||||||
measurement done via | ||||||
manual distance | ||||||
measurement tool | Automated preliminary | |||||
border detection; creates | ||||||
3D mesh and | ||||||
auto-segmentation of | ||||||
AAA to derive volume | ||||||
and diameter | ||||||
measurements once | ||||||
preliminary borders are | ||||||
confirmed by user | Both subject device and | |||||
predicate create 3D mesh to | ||||||
derive volume measurement. | ||||||
The difference is predicate | ||||||
GI-3DQ use manual distance | ||||||
measurement tool for | ||||||
diameter measurement, while | ||||||
the subject device AAA can | ||||||
derive the diameter | ||||||
measurements from the 3D | ||||||
mesh and auto-segmentation | ||||||
of the 3D model. The impact | ||||||
of the difference on safety | ||||||
and effectiveness is | ||||||
addressed by the | ||||||
measurement accuracy test | ||||||
from bench performance | ||||||
testing | ||||||
Measurement | ||||||
Parameters | This app computes | |||||
linear measurements, area | ||||||
measurements, stacked | ||||||
contour volume | ||||||
measurements, and | This app calculates | |||||
plaque and lumen areas, | ||||||
and also the percent | ||||||
reduction for each | ||||||
tracked frame. | AAA model provides | |||||
Max Anteroposterior | ||||||
(AP) diameter, Max | ||||||
Lateral Diameter (LAT), | ||||||
Max any direction | The measurements function | |||||
of AAA model, including the | ||||||
diameter measurement and | ||||||
volume measurement, is | ||||||
similar to GI3DQ. | ||||||
Primary Predicate | Reference Device | Subject Device | Explanation of Differences | |||
Trade Name | QLAB System | QLAB System | QLAB System | N/A | ||
Feature | GI-3DQ | VPQ | AAA Model | N/A | ||
510(k) number | K200974 | K121223 | K200603 | N/A | ||
ellipsoid volume | ||||||
measurements. | (MAD) diameter, and | |||||
partial volume | ||||||
measurement. |
7
8
9
10
Traditional 510(k)
AAA Model K200603
11
6. Nonclinical Performance Data
AAA Model was tested in accordance with Philips internal processes. Non-Clinical verification testing has been performed addressing system level requirements according to system and design specifications, and risk control measures. Software verification and clinical performance accuracy data were used to support substantial equivalence of the AAA Model application to the predicate QLAB Advanced Quantification Software applications.
| Bench
Testing | Test Method | Sample | Acceptance
Criteria | Result |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Measurement
Accuracy
Verification | EPIQ diagnostic
ultrasound
system was used
to take 3D
ultrasound
images of 3
phantoms with
various diameter.
AAA model was
used to measure
the
AP/LAT/MAD
diameter and
partial volume. | 7 samples were
used for each
measurement. | ± 9% accuracy
for volume
measurement and
± 5% for all
diameter
measurements,
with 90%
confidence
interval. | All
measurements
met the
acceptance
criteria. |
7. Clinical testing
Clinical performance evaluation study showed that the aneurysm AP diameter measurement from AAA model is in agreement with the measurement from 2D ultrasound as the current standard of care, which supports that the performance of AAA model is appropriate for its intended use of AP diameter measurement for the evaluation of abdominal aorta aneurysm.
Clinical testing | Test Method | Sample | Acceptance Criteria | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Native AAA clinical evaluation | Native AAA ultrasound images were acquired during normal ultrasound examination in hospital. AP diameter from | 129 Native AAA datasets were gathered from one hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. 91 of the exams met the inclusion criteria. All | At least 80% of all cases in which Philips AAA Model provides maximum AP diameter results that match standard of care | Result met the target successful rate. |
12
Traditional 510(k) AAA Model K200603
| Clinical testing | Test Method | Sample | Acceptance
Criteria | Result |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| | 2D ultrasound
measurement,
and from 3D
ultrasound
measurement
with AAA
model are
compared. | patients age> 18
years old. | measurements to
within ± 10% | |
| Post -EVAR
AAA clinical
evaluation | Post-EVAR
AAA ultrasound
images were
acquired during
normal
ultrasound
examination in
hospital. AP
diameter from
2D ultrasound
measurement,
and from 3D
ultrasound
measurement
with AAA
model are
compared. | 77 Post-EVAR
AAA datasets
were gathered
from one
hospital in
Copenhagen,
Denmark. 45 of
the exams met
the inclusion
criteria. All
patients age> 18
years old. | At least 80% of
all cases in
which Philips
AAA Model
provides
maximum AP
diameter results
that match
standard of care
measurements to
within ± 10% | Result met the
target
successful rate. |
8. Sterilization
Not applicable. This is a software only device.
9. Conclusion
For testing, all pre-determined acceptance criteria were met. Results of these tests show that the proposed AAA Model meets the intended use. The differences between the subject device and predicate device do not raise new questions of safety and/or effectiveness. Therefore, the proposed AAA Model is substantially equivalent to the predicate QLAB Advanced Quantification Software applications in terms of intended use, technological characteristics, safety and effectiveness.