(117 days)
The EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is intended for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine (L2-S1) for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is designed for use with autogenous and/or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion and supplemental fixation system cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbosacral spine. The devices are to be used in patients who have had at least six months of non-operative treatment.
The EVOL® ha -D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is designed for use as a lumbar interbody fusion device and consists of various sizes to accommodate individual patient anatomy. The sizes vary by footprint (width and depth), height, and lordotic angle. All sizes have two central windows for bone graft. The inferior and superior faces have teeth to resist migration when placed in between the vertebral bodies. Each spacer has tantalum beads, per ASTM F560, imbedded in the device to aid visualization under fluoroscopy. The implants are manufactured from PEEK-OPTIMA® LT120 HA (Invibio) per ASTM F2026.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System. It describes the device, its intended use, and its comparison to predicate devices, including performance testing. However, it does not contain the specific information required to complete the detailed table about acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or clinical study specifics (like MRMC studies, expert qualifications, or adjudication methods).
This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence for regulatory approval, primarily through mechanical performance testing to established standards, rather than establishing clinical effectiveness or diagnostic accuracy.
Therefore, most of the requested information cannot be extracted from this document.
Here's a breakdown of what can be extracted and what cannot:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
- Acceptance Criteria: The document states that "Testing was performed for the EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System and demonstrated substantial equivalent performance to the identified predicate" and "In all, the biomechanical testing results demonstrate the EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device." It also mentions testing in accordance with ASTM F2077 and ASTM F2267 standards (static & dynamic tests for compression and compression shear, subsidence, and expulsion tests).
- However, the specific numerical acceptance criteria (e.g., "must withstand X N of compression for Y cycles") and the numerical reported device performance (e.g., "device withstood Z N for W cycles") are NOT provided in this summary. The summary only states that the device "demonstrated substantial equivalent performance" to the predicate.
| Acceptance Criteria (General) | Reported Device Performance (General) |
|---|---|
| Substantial equivalent performance to predicate | Demonstrated substantial equivalent performance to predicate |
| Adherence to ASTM F2077 & ASTM F2267 | Tests performed in accordance with ASTM F2077 & ASTM F2267 |
| Pass static & dynamic compression tests | Tests performed for static & dynamic compression |
| Pass compression shear tests | Tests performed for compression shear |
| Pass subsidence tests | Tests performed for subsidence |
| Pass expulsion tests | Tests performed for expulsion |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified. This refers to the number of physical devices or constructs tested, which is not detailed in this summary.
- Data Provenance (Country of Origin, Retrospective/Prospective): Not specified. This type of information is typically for clinical data, which is not the focus here.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience):
- Not Applicable. This device is an interbody fusion system (an implant), not a diagnostic algorithm. The "ground truth" for mechanical testing is based on the physical properties and performance of the device under stress, compared against established standards and predicate devices, not expert human interpretation of medical images or diagnostic outcomes.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not Applicable. As above, this is for diagnostic algorithms assessing human interpretation, not mechanical device testing.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No. This is a mechanical orthopedic implant, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool. Therefore, an MRMC study is not relevant and was not performed.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- No. This is a mechanical orthopedic implant, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- The "ground truth" for this type of submission is the mechanical performance standards (ASTM F2077, ASTM F2267) and the established performance of the predicate devices. The device is deemed "substantially equivalent" if it meets or exceeds these mechanical benchmarks.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not Applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an AI/ML model that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not Applicable. As above, this is for AI/ML models.
In summary, the provided document focuses on the mechanical equivalence for regulatory clearance of an orthopedic implant. It is not an evaluation of a diagnostic AI device, which would require the kinds of detailed clinical study information requested in your prompt.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
January 6, 2020
Cutting Edge Spine, LLC Mr. Kyle Kuntz Manager R&D 101 Waxhaw Professional Park. Suite A Waxhaw, North Carolina 28173
Re: K192497
Trade/Device Name: EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX Dated: December 10, 2019 Received: December 11, 2019
Dear Mr. Kuntz:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Brent L. Showalter Assistant Director (Acting) DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: January 31, 2017
See PRA Statement below.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K192497
Device Name
EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is intervertebral body fusion of the spine in sketally mature patients. EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine (L2-S1) for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is designed for use with autogenous and/ or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion and supplemental fixation system cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbosacral spine. The devices are to be used in patients who have had at least six months of non-operative treatment.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- | -- |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Cutting Edge Spine. The logo features three curved lines in orange, green, and blue above the letters "CES" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the letters, the words "CUTTING EDGE SPINE" are written in a smaller font.
6. 510(k) Summary
I. SUBMITTER
Date Prepared: 9/6/2019
| Applicant: | Cutting Edge Spine, LLC |
|---|---|
| 101 Waxhaw Professional Park Dr., Suite A | |
| Waxhaw, NC 28173 | |
| Contact Person: | Kyle Kuntz, Manager R&D |
| Tel: (704) 243-0892 | |
| e-mail: k.kuntz@cuttingedgespine.com |
Application Correspondents:
| Contact Person: | Kyle Kuntz, Manager R&D | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tel: (704) 243-0892 | |||
| e-mail: k.kuntz@cuttingedgespine.com | |||
| Alternate Contact: | Shyam Patel, R&D Biomedical Engineer | ||
| Tel: (704) 243-0892e-mail: s.patel@cuttingedgespine.com |
II. DEVICE
| Trade Name: | EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System |
|---|---|
| Common or Usual Name: | Intervertebral Body Fusion Device |
| Classification Name: | Per 21 CFR as follows:888.3080Intervertebral Fusion Device with Bone Graft, Lumba |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Codes: | MAX |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Cutting Edge Spine. The logo consists of the letters CES in a stylized font, with the words "CUTTING EDGE SPINE" written below. Above the letters is a graphic of three curved lines in orange, blue, and green. Below the logo are the words "PREDICATE DEVICES".
| 510(k) Number | Device | Manufacturer | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PrimaryPredicate | K153782 | Lumbar InterbodyImplants | NuVasive |
| AdditionalPredicate | K180674 | EVOL® ha – C CervicalInterbody Fusion System | Cutting Edge Spine |
| AdditionalPredicate | K102957 | Spinal Interbody Device(EVOL) | Cutting Edge Spine |
DEVICE DESCRIPTION IV.
The purpose of this submission to request approval for a new product. The EVOL® ha -D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is designed for use as a lumbar interbody fusion device and consists of various sizes to accommodate individual patient anatomy. The sizes vary by footprint (width and depth), height, and lordotic angle. All sizes have two central windows for bone graft. The inferior and superior faces have teeth to resist migration when placed in between the vertebral bodies. Each spacer has tantalum beads, per ASTM F560, imbedded in the device to aid visualization under fluoroscopy. The implants are manufactured from PEEK-OPTIMA® LT120 HA (Invibio) per ASTM F2026.
V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is intended for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine (L2-S1) for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The EVOL® ha - D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is designed for use with autogenous and/or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft to facilitate fusion and supplemental fixation system cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbosacral spine. The devices are to be used in patients who have had at least six months of non-operative treatment.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo for Cutting Edge Spine. The logo features a stylized, colorful swirl above the text "CES" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below "CES" is the text "CUTTING EDGE SPINE" in a smaller, thinner font. The swirl consists of three curved lines in orange, green, and blue.
COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH PREDICATE DEVICES
Documentation was submitted which demonstrated that the EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices based on a comparison of the following characteristics:
- FDA product codes
- Indications for Use
- Surgical Approach
- Anatomical Region
- Implant Materials ●
- Product Dimensions
- Device Features
- Mechancial Performance ●
- Available by prescription only
- Made for single use ●
NON-CLINICAL AND CLINICAL PERFORMANCE TESTING VII.
Testing was performed for the EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System and demonstrated substantial equivalent performance to the identified predicate. The mechanical tests were performed in accordance to these test methods:
- ASTM F2077 ● ASTM F2267
- Expulsion Testing
The tests performed include: static & dynamic tests for compression, and compression shear. Subsidence and expulsion tests were also performed.
In all, the biomechanical testing results demonstrate the EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
CONCLUSIONS VIII.
Based upon a comparison of technological characteristics, intended use, design features, and mechanical performance, the EVOL® ha – D Lateral Interbody Fusion System does not raise any new safety or efficacy concerns and has demonstrated substantial equivalence to the identified predicates.
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.