(216 days)
Not Found
No
The device description and performance studies focus on the material properties and biocompatibility of a light-cured resin, with no mention of AI or ML capabilities.
Yes
The device is described as a "light-curved complex resin for aesthetic restoration for both anterior and posterior parts" used for "restoration that requires aesthetics through decay and damage," which directly addresses and treats a medical condition (dental decay/damage).
No
The device is described as a light-curved complex resin for aesthetic restoration, indicating it is used for treatment and repair rather than diagnosis.
No
The device description clearly states it is a "light-curved complex resin" in a "paste form" and is packaged with physical components like a syringe and disposable tip. This indicates it is a physical material, not software.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In vitro diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections. They are used to provide information for diagnosis, monitoring, or screening.
- Device Description and Intended Use: The description clearly states the device is a "light-curved complex resin for aesthetic restoration" used for "restoration that requires aesthetics through decay and damage." Its intended uses are for restoring dental cavities (Class III, V, smaller IV), repairing dental materials, and undercut blockout.
- Lack of Biological Sample Testing: There is no mention of the device being used to test or analyze any biological samples from a patient. It is a material applied directly to the tooth.
- Performance Studies: The performance studies listed focus on material properties, biocompatibility, and safety standards related to dental restorative materials, not diagnostic accuracy or performance on biological samples.
Therefore, this device falls under the category of a dental restorative material, not an in vitro diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
-Restoration of Class III, Class V, smaller Class IV
-Repair of resin, porcelain, and acrylic temporary materials
-Undercut blockout
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
EBF
Device Description
The subject device is a light-curved complex resin for aesthetic restoration for both anterior and posterior parts, which is used for restoration that requires aesthetics through decay and damage in a form of paste with unpolymerized dimethacrylate monomer, inorganic filler, and photoinitiators mixed. The subject device is packaged with the following: Syringe, Disposable Tip, Protective Cap, Shade Sheet
Model Name: There are 57 models, and they are divided 19 types. (A1, A2, A2O, A3, A3O, A3.5, A4, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C4, D1, D2, D3, D4) These 19 types have differences in the pigment type and content (%).
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
This device has demonstrated conformance with non-clinical performance requirements through evaluation and testing in accordance with the following harmonized standards:
•ISO 4049:2009, Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials
•ISO 7405:2008, Dentistry – Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry
•ISO 10993-1:2009, Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
•ISO 10993-2:2006, Animal welfare requirements
•ISO 10993-3:2014, Tests for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity
·ISO 10993-5:2009, Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
•ISO 10993-6:2016, Tests for local effects after implantation
•ISO 10993-10:2010, Tests for irritation and skin sensitization
· ISO 10993-11:2017, Tests for systemic toxicity
·ISO 10993-12:2012, Sample preparation and reference materials
Through this additional non-clinical bench testing, the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
No clinical data was collected or provided to support substantial equivalence between the subject and predicate devices.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 872.3690 Tooth shade resin material.
(a)
Identification. Tooth shade resin material is a device composed of materials such as bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) intended to restore carious lesions or structural defects in teeth.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue. Underneath the FDA logo is the word "ADMINISTRATION".
March 25, 2020
Diadent Group International Kab Lee Quality Assurance Manager 16, Osongsaengmyeong 4-ro, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu Cheongji-si, 28161 Chungcheongbuk-do KOREA
Re: K192284
Trade/Device Name: DiaFil Flow Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3690 Regulation Name: Tooth shade resin material Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: EBF Dated: December 26, 2019 Received: December 26, 2019
Dear Kab Lee:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
1
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Srinivas "Nandu" Nandkumar, Ph.D. Director DHT1B: Division of Dental Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K192284
Device Name DiaFil Flow
Indications for Use (Describe)
-Restoration of Class III, Class V, smaller Class IV
-Repair of resin, porcelain, and acrylic temporary materials
-Undercut blockout
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) Summary
This 510(k) summary on the safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
1. Application Information
Date Prepared | Mar 25,2020 |
---|---|
Company Name and | |
Address | DiaDent Group International |
16, Osongsaengmyeong 4-ro, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu, | |
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28161, Republic of Korea | |
Contact Person | Kab Sun Lee |
Quality Assurance Manager | |
Phone: +82-43-266-2315 | |
FAX: +82-43-235-2315 | |
Email: diadent32@diadent.co.kr |
2. Device Information
Device Name | DiaFil Flow |
---|---|
510(k) Number | K192284 |
Classification Name | Tooth shade resin material |
Review Panel | Dental |
Regulation Number | 21 CFR 872.3690 |
Product Code | EBF |
Device Class | II |
3. Predicate Devices
The legally marketed devices to which substantial equivalence is being claimed are:
Primary Predicate Device | |
---|---|
510(k) Number: | K060637 |
Applicant: | VERICOM CO., LTD. |
Device Name: | DENFIL FLOW |
Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 872.3690 |
Product Code: | EBF |
Device Class: | II |
4. Device Description
The subject device is a light-curved complex resin for aesthetic restoration for both anterior and posterior parts, which is used for restoration that requires aesthetics through decay and damage in a form of paste with unpolymerized dimethacrylate monomer, inorganic filler, and photoinitiators mixed. The subject device is packaged with the following: Syringe, Disposable Tip, Protective Cap, Shade Sheet
Model Name: There are 57 models, and they are divided 19 types. (A1, A2, A2O, A3, A3O, A3.5, A4, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C4, D1, D2, D3, D4) These 19 types have differences in the pigment type and content (%).
4
Also, they (19 types) are packaged according to 3 forms: Economic, Refill, Intro Kit. The components of each package form are as follows.
Components | |||
---|---|---|---|
Syringe | Disposable tips | Shade Sheet | |
Economic Package | 2g x 4ea | 40ea | 1ea |
Refill Package | 2g x 1ea | 10ea | N/A |
Intro Kit | 0.5g x 1ea | 2ea | N/A |
5. Indications for Use
-Restoration of Class III. Class V. smaller Class IV
-Repair of resin, porcelain, and acrylic temporary materials
-Undercut blockout
6. Non-Clinical Performance Data
This device has demonstrated conformance with non-clinical performance requirements through evaluation and testing in accordance with the following harmonized standards:
•ISO 4049:2009, Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials
•ISO 7405:2008, Dentistry – Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry
•ISO 10993-1:2009, Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
•ISO 10993-2:2006, Animal welfare requirements
•ISO 10993-3:2014, Tests for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity
·ISO 10993-5:2009, Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
•ISO 10993-6:2016, Tests for local effects after implantation
•ISO 10993-10:2010, Tests for irritation and skin sensitization
· ISO 10993-11:2017, Tests for systemic toxicity
·ISO 10993-12:2012, Sample preparation and reference materials
Through this additional non-clinical bench testing, the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
7. Clinical Performance Data
No clinical data was collected or provided to support substantial equivalence between the subject and predicate devices.
8. Comparison with predicate Device
8.1 Comparison table
This device compares to the legally marketed devices as follows:
Subject Device | Primary Predicate Device | Discussion | |
---|---|---|---|
510(k) | |||
Number | - | K060637 | |
Applicant | DiaDent Group | ||
International | VERICOM CO., LTD. | ||
Device Name | DiaFil Flow | DENFIL FLOW | |
Indications | |||
for Use | •Restoration of Class | ||
III, Class V, smaller | |||
Class IV | •Class V restorations | ||
(Cervical caries, root | |||
erosion, wedge | |||
shaped defects) | See the below | ||
Repair of resin, porcelain, and acrylic temporary materials Undercut blockout | Anterior restorations (Class III, IV) Small posterior restorations Restorative therapy for mini-cavities of all types Extended fissures sealings in molars and premolars Repair of composite/ceramic veneers Blocking out of undercuts | ||
Description | DiaFil Flow belongs to Group 1 of Class 2 of Type 1 according to the standard classification of ISO 4049. It is a light-curved complex resin for aesthetic restoration for both anterior and posterior parts. It is used for aesthetic restoration which is caused by decay and damage, and it is a paste form consisting of a mixture of unpolymerized dimethacrylate monomer, inorganic filler, and photoinitiators. That means that it makes a hard restoration by polymerizing through dental visible-ray polymerizer after recovering with the unpolymerized product. | DenFil Flow is a light-cured radio-opaque flowable restorative resin. It is composed of Epoxyacrylate (Bis-GMA), Diurethane dimethacrylate, Triethylenglycol dimethacrylate, Barium aluminosilicate, and other materials. As Denfil flow has a lower viscosity than paste type composite resin-Flow; 0.16 mm/30sec, so it can restore narrow & deep cavity easily. DenFil Flow can be applied to fill cavities of all types exactly and efficiently by using a disposable tip. And DenFil Flow has various shades that correspond to the most common used shading system. | Equivalent |
Package Contents | Syringe Disposable Tip Protective Cap | Syringe Disposable Tip Protective Cap | Equivalent |
Image | Image: DIAFIL FLOW | Image: DenFil Flow | |
Composition | •UDMA | ||
•Bis-EMA | |||
•TMPTMA | |||
•BKY-405 | |||
•Barium-alumino- | |||
silicate | |||
•Silica | |||
•Ytterbium | |||
•Camphorquinone | |||
•Ethyl-4- | |||
(Dimethylamino)benzo | |||
ate(EDB) | |||
•BHT | |||
•2-Hydoxy-4- | |||
(octoxy)benzophenone | •UDMA | ||
•Bis-GMA | |||
•TEGDMA | |||
•Barium-alumino- | |||
silicate | |||
•Silica | See the below | ||
Light curing | |||
time | 20 seconds | ||
(If light curing unit | |||
output is below | |||
400mW/cm2, as | |||
measured by a curing | |||
radiometer, more time | |||
may be needed.) | 20 seconds | ||
(If light curing unit | |||
output is below | |||
400mW/cm2, as | |||
measured by a curing | |||
radiometer, more time | |||
may be needed.) | Equivalent | ||
Period of Use | Permanent | Permanent | Equivalent |
Shelf life | 3 years | 3 years | Equivalent |
Bio- | |||
compatibility | Biocompatible | Biocompatible | Equivalent |
Standards | ISO7405 | ISO7405 | Equivalent |
5
Product Name: DiaFil Flow
6
DiaDent Group International
Product Name: DiaFil Flow
9. Differences
Indication for use
Subject Device | Primary Predicate Device |
---|---|
DiaFil Flow | DENFIL FLOW |
Restoration of Class III, Class V, | |
smaller Class IV | Class V restorations (cervical caries, root erosion, |
wedge shaped defects) | |
Anterior restorations (Class III, IV) | |
Small posterior restorations | |
Repair of resin, porcelain, and | |
acrylic temporary materials | Restorative therapy for mini-cavities of all types |
Extended fissures sealings in molars and premolars | |
Repair of composite/ceramic veneers | |
Undercut blockout | Blocking out of undercuts |
7
The subject device has the same indications for use as the predicate device. The indications for use of the subject device is more simplified than the predicate device.
Material composition |
---|
Subject Device | Primary Predicate Device |
---|---|
DiaFil Flow | DENFIL FLOW |
•UDMA | •UDMA |
•Bis-EMA | •Bis-GMA |
•TMPTMA | •TEGDMA |
•BKY-405 | •Barium-alumino-silicate |
•Barium-alumino-silicate | •Silica |
•Silica | |
•Ytterbium | |
•Camphorquinone | |
•Ethyl-4- | |
(Dimethylamino)benzoate(EDB) | |
•BHT | |
•2-Hydoxy-4- | |
(octoxy)benzophenone |
The main compositions are similar, but the compositions of DiaFil Flow and the predicate device are not same completely. However, DiaFil Flow and the predicate device are substantially equivalent through Biological Safety Assessment Report. (#BSA-2018-14)
The subject device has the similar technological characteristics as the predicate device: indications for use, main raw materials, mechanical properties (curing time, photopolymerization type resin).
ConClusions
Based on the above information and all data provided in this submission, the comparison of indications for use, technological characteristics, and non-clinical performance testing demonstrates that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed devices identified in this submission.