(268 days)
Not Found
No
The device description focuses on the material properties and mechanical function of the implant, with no mention of AI or ML.
No.
The device is an implantable orthopedic device designed to provide continuous compression for bone reconstruction and fusion, not a device that applies therapy or treatment to a disease or condition.
No
The device is a continuous compression implant designed for small bone reconstruction and fusion of phalanges in the toes. It is an implantable surgical device, not a diagnostic tool.
No
The device description clearly details a physical implant made of Nitinol and associated surgical tools (insertion stick, drill pin, etc.), indicating it is a hardware medical device, not software-only.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is "small bone reconstruction and fusion of the phalanges in the toes." This describes a surgical procedure performed directly on the patient's body.
- Device Description: The description details a physical implant made of Nitinol, designed to be inserted into bone to provide compression. This is a surgical implant, not a device used to test samples outside the body.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.), performing tests in a laboratory setting, or providing diagnostic information based on in vitro analysis.
IVD devices are used to examine specimens derived from the human body to provide information for the diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment, or alleviation of disease. This device is a surgical implant used for structural support and fusion within the body.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant is indicated for small bone reconstruction and fusion of the phalanges in the toes.
Product codes
JDR
Device Description
The implants of the DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant System are made of biocompatible Nitinol and are designed to exhibit pseudoelastic (superelastic) properties at room temperature. Each implant is supplied pre-loaded on an insertion stick assembly in a constrained state, with the legs parallel. It is inserted into pre-drilled holes and released utilizing the insertion slider and if necessary, impaction on the proximal end of the insertion stick. Upon release, the implants attempt to return to their original unconstrained shape and thus provide compression to the bones across the osteotomy or arthrodesis site. The implants do not require any external heating; they are completely transformed at ambient temperature. In good bone quality, this deflection may not be visible as the legs are constrained by the surrounding tissue.
The implant is offered in two (2) sizes to address varying patient anatomy of the foot.
The implant is delivered to the operating room in a disposable, sterile kit, preloaded onto a handheld insertion stick assembly along with a drill pin, drill guide, locator pins and K-wires.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
phalanges in the toes
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Operating room
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The following analysis were conducted:
Static Bend according to ASTM F564 Pullout testing was performed according to ASTM F564 Corrosion testing was performed according to ASTM F2129 Dynamic Bend Testing Endotoxin Testing was performed according to AAMI ST72 Other Additional Testing: MRI Conditional analysis has been performed to establish MR Conditional parameters for the subject DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
BioMedical Enterprises, Inc. OSStaple (K993714), BioMedical Enterprises, Inc. Hammerlock 2(K133520)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 888.3030 Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories.
(a)
Identification. Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
February 26, 2020
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Synthes (USA) Products, LLC Keith Knapp RA Specialist 1301 Goshen Parkway West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380
Re: K191463
Trade/Device Name: DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/Multiple Component Metallic Bone Fixation Appliances And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JDR Dated: January 24, 2020 Received: January 27, 2020
Dear Keith Knapp:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmp/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see
1
https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
FOR Vesa Vuniqi Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191463
Device Name
DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant
Indications for Use (Describe)
The DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant is indicated for small bone reconstruction and fusion of the phalanges in the toes.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
X | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------510(k) Summary
| Sponsor | DePuy Synthes
Keith Knapp
1301 Goshen Parkway
West Chester, PA 19380
Phone: +1-610-719-5942 |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date Prepared | February 2020 |
| Proprietary Name | DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant |
| Device Common
Name | Staple, Fixation, Bone |
| Classification Name | Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and
accessories. |
| Classification | Class II
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030
Product Code: JDR |
| Predicate Devices | Primary Predicate Device:
BioMedical Enterprises, Inc. OSStaple (K993714)
Secondary Predicate Device:
BioMedical Enterprises, Inc. Hammerlock 2(K133520) |
| Device Description | The implants of the DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression
Implant System are made of biocompatible Nitinol and are designed to
exhibit pseudoelastic (superelastic) properties at room temperature. Each
implant is supplied pre-loaded on an insertion stick assembly in a
constrained state, with the legs parallel. It is inserted into pre-drilled holes
and released utilizing the insertion slider and if necessary, impaction on the
proximal end of the insertion stick. Upon release, the implants attempt to
return to their original unconstrained shape and thus provide compression
to the bones across the osteotomy or arthrodesis site. The implants do not
require any external heating; they are completely transformed at ambient
temperature. In good bone quality, this deflection may not be visible as the
legs are constrained by the surrounding tissue.
The implant is offered in two (2) sizes to address varying patient anatomy of
the foot. |
| | The implant is delivered to the operating room in a disposable, sterile kit, preloaded onto a handheld insertion stick assembly along with a drill pin, drill guide, locator pins and K-wires. |
| Indications for use | The DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implant is indicated for small bone reconstruction and fusion of the phalanges in the toes. |
| Comparison to
Predicate | The design, features, and specifications of the subject and primary predicate systems compared below. The shared technological characteristics are as follows:
Range of staple legs of the subject device are within range of those offered in the predicate device. The material of both the subject device and predicate device is Nitinol. |
| | Technical characteristics found in the subject implants that are not found in the primary predicate are listed below: The predicate requires the application of an electrical current to the staple after implant placement to heat and transform the nitinol material, the subject device requires no additional steps after implant placement. The principles of operation - compression across the operative site are the same in both devices. The predicate has smooth legs while the subject device features three (3) barbs. This increases the pullout strength of the subject device compared to the predicate. |
| | The design, features, and specifications of the subject and secondary predicate systems compared below. The shared technological characteristics are as follows: The material of both the subject device and predicate device is Nitinol. Both devices include barbed legs for increased pullout strength Both devices require no external energy source to achieve compression |
| | Technical characteristics found in the subject implants that are not found in the secondary predicate are listed below: The predicate is inserted in an intramedullary fashion while the subject device in inserted extra-medullary, but both are intended to bridge the fusion site and provide compression. The predicate includes a greater number of legs. |
| Non-clinical
Performance Data | The following analysis were conducted:
Static Bend according to ASTM F564 Pullout testing was performed according to ASTM F564 Corrosion testing was performed according to ASTM F2129 Dynamic Bend Testing Endotoxin Testing was performed according to AAMI ST72 Other Additional Testing: MRI Conditional analysis has been performed to establish MR
Conditional parameters for the subject DePuy Synthes Hammertoe
Continuous Compression Implant |
| Clinical
Performance Data | Clinical testing was not necessary for the determination of substantial
equivalence. |
| Substantial
Equivalence | The DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implants possess
the equivalent technological characteristics as that of the primary predicate
device. These include: principles of operation basic design material sizes (dimensions are comparable to those offered by the predicate
systems) The DePuy Synthes Hammertoe Continuous Compression Implants possess
the equivalent technological characteristics as that of the secondary
predicate device. These include: material method of compression design features The proposed device has indications for use that are fully encompassed by
the indications for use of the primary and secondary predicate device and
both the subject and predicate devices are manufactured from the same
nitinol material.
The mechanical testing and analytical evaluation included in this submission
demonstrate that any differences in technological characteristics of the
subject devices do not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness.
The proposed devices are at least as safe and effective as the primary and
secondary predicate devices.
It is concluded that the information provided in this submission supports
substantial equivalence. |
4
5